Nea Salamis vs APEA: match statistics
Nea Salamis is displaying dominant form as league leaders, boasting an impressive record of 12 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses this season. The hosts are exceptionally effective at home, winning 67% of their matches while keeping clean sheets in 67% of games and conceding an average of just 0.33 goals per match. Their dominance in possession (60%) and superior xG (2.16) compared to xGA (0.82) confirm both attacking potency and defensive stability. APEA sits in 10th place with mediocre away form (50% wins but 33% losses), significantly lower possession stats (47%), and an inferior xG balance (1.38 vs 1.27). The gap in quality, form, and statistics clearly points to a confident victory for the hosts, who have averaged 2.6 points per game in their last five outings compared to just 1.4 for the visitors.
Nea Salamis vs APEA: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nea Salamis played against APEA in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on January 10, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Nea Salamis has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. APEA has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Nea Salamis scores 1.79 goals per game and allows 0.36. APEA scores 1.36 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of Nea Salamis's games and 50% of APEA's. The Over 2.5 rates are 36% and 71%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nea Salamis has the higher season xG average, 2.07 to 1.41 per game. Nea Salamis takes 13.5 shots per game, while APEA takes 8.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Nea Salamis leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. APEA leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.79 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nea Salamis's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For APEA, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nea Salamis is displaying dominant form as league leaders, boasting an impressive record of 12 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses this season. The hosts are exceptionally effective at home, winning 67% of their matches while keeping clean sheets in 67% of games and conceding an average of just 0.33 goals per match. Their dominance in possession (60%) and superior xG (2.16) compared to xGA (0.82) confirm both attacking potency and defensive stability. APEA sits in 10th place with mediocre away form (50% wins but 33% losses), significantly lower possession stats (47%), and an inferior xG balance (1.38 vs 1.27). The gap in quality, form, and statistics clearly points to a confident victory for the hosts, who have averaged 2.6 points per game in their last five outings compared to just 1.4 for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nea Salamis | APEA | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nea Salamis is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Nea Salamis · 1.4 pts / game - APEA
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nea Salamis is 32% better for: goals scored per game.
1.79 goals / game - Nea Salamis · 1.36 goals / game - APEA
Nea Salamis is 317% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.36 goals / game - Nea Salamis · 1.5 goals / game - APEA
Nea Salamis scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 meczów), while APEA keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 meczów).
APEA scores in 71% of games (10 of 14 meczów), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 71% (10 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nea Salamis
Over / Under - APEA
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nea Salamis is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Nea Salamis · 1.29 pts / game - APEA
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nea Salamis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 86%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
APEA - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nea Salamis
APEA
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Nea Salamis | Liga | APEA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.14 | 2.49 | ▲ 2.86 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 46% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 36% | 45% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 71% | 32% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 67% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 76% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Nea SalamisGoalJosé Manuel Artiles Romero
- Nea SalamisGoalPanagiotis Louka
FAQ
What was the result of Nea Salamis vs APEA?
The Second Division match finished Nea Salamis 2:0 APEA. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nea Salamis vs APEA?
Nea Salamis score 1.79 goals per game on average and APEA 1.36. The Second Division average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Nea Salamis's matches and 50% of APEA's.
What form are Nea Salamis and APEA in?
Over the last 5 games Nea Salamis have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and APEA 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nea Salamis vs APEA?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.