Nea Salamis vs Ayia Napa: match statistics
Nea Salamis vs Ayia Napa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nea Salamis played against Ayia Napa in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 3:0.
Recent form
Nea Salamis has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Ayia Napa has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Nea Salamis scores 1.88 goals per game and allows 0.52. Ayia Napa scores 1.32 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Nea Salamis's games and 44% of Ayia Napa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 40%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nea Salamis has the higher season xG average, 1.87 to 1.22 per game. Nea Salamis takes 11.4 shots per game, while Ayia Napa takes 4.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Nea Salamis leads at halftime in 60% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Ayia Napa leads at halftime in 12% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nea Salamis's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Ayia Napa, it is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nea Salamis holds a clear statistical advantage: this season 21 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses with a 47-13 goal difference, and at home they average 1.67 goals scored and 0.42 conceded per match. Home xG is 1.97 versus away xG 1.36 for the visitors, and Nea averages 16.4 shots (6.4 on target) against Ayia Napa’s 9.38 shots (4.75 on target), reflecting superior quantity and quality of chances. In the last 5 matches Nea has scored 10 and conceded 6, recording 3 wins and 2 draws (PPG 2.2), while Ayia Napa has 6 goals and as many as 14 conceded, with no wins in those five games (PPG 0.2). Additionally, Nea Salamis has 58% clean sheets at home compared to 15% clean sheets for the visitors away and a lower rate of matches without scoring (17% vs 23%), therefore I assess a high probability of a home win (around 78%), draw 12% and away win 10%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonally Nea Salamis has a low BTTS 17% and keeps a clean sheet in 42% of matches, which on the surface argues against Goal/Goal, while Ayia Napa has a seasonal BTTS of 69% and only 15% clean sheets, giving the opposite signal. In the last 5 matches Nea Salamis recorded BTTS in 80%, scored on average 2.0 goals and conceded 1.2, and Ayia Napa in that period conceded a total of 14 goals (2.8 per match). Over the season Ayia Napa scores 1.69 goals per game, averages 4.75 shots on target and has 20% conversion, so they have a real potential to get on the scoresheet. Additionally recent xG shows 1.23 xG for the home side versus 0.75 xG for the visitors, and the visitors have conceded 1.43 xG in the last 5 matches, which together increases the chance of an exchange of goals. Considering the home side’s 80% BTTS in the short term, Ayia Napa’s seasonal 69% BTTS and the visitors’ 14 goals conceded in 5 matches, I pick BTTS = Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have a high percentage of matches over 1.5 goals: Nea Salamis 67% and Ayia Napa 92%, which provides a strong signal for Over 1.5. An xG-based model suggests 1.16 xG for the home side (home attacking xG 1.05 vs Ayia Napa’s average xG conceded 1.26) and 1.34 xG for the visitors (Ayia Napa attacking xG 1.36 vs Nea Salamis’s average xG conceded 1.33), totaling around 2.50 expected goals. Ayia Napa averages 4.75 shots on target versus Nea Salamis’s 2.57 and has a higher shot conversion rate of 20% versus 12%, supporting their goal-scoring potential. Seasonal indicators for Over 2.5 are divergent (Nea Salamis 17% vs Ayia Napa 62%), but the home side’s last 5 matches show 80% Over 2.5 with a goals balance of 10-6, so the 2.5 market is effectively even. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (probability ~82%), while the 2.5 line appears a 50/50 split and Over 3.5 is unlikely (~22% Over).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonally Ayia Napa performs better — averaging 1.69 goals per game versus Nea Salamis’ 0.92, higher xG 1.36 vs 1.05 and 4.75 shots on target compared to 2.57 — suggesting greater scoring potential from the visitors. However, the last 5 matches clearly favor the hosts: Nea Salamis led at the break in 60% of cases (3 of 5) and averaged 1.2 goals by half-time versus Ayia Napa’s 0.4. Additionally, the hosts averaged 2.0 goals per game and 2.2 points per game over the last 5, while Ayia Napa managed 1.2 goals and only 0.2 points per game while conceding an average of 2.8 goals, indicating weak away defensive form. Considering the hosts’ advantage in the most recent 5 matches and their more frequent leads at the break (half-time goal difference +4 vs -7 for the visitors), the most likely scenario is the home side leading at the break and winning after the final whistle (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nea Salamis | Ayia Napa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.27 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.72 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nea Salamis is 1000% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Nea Salamis · 0.2 pts / game - Ayia Napa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nea Salamis is 42% better for: goals scored per game.
1.88 goals / game - Nea Salamis · 1.32 goals / game - Ayia Napa
Nea Salamis is 169% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.52 goals / game - Nea Salamis · 1.4 goals / game - Ayia Napa
Nea Salamis scores in 88% of games (22 of 25 meczów), while Ayia Napa keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 meczów).
Ayia Napa scores in 60% of games (15 of 25 meczów), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 60% (15 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nea Salamis
Over / Under - Ayia Napa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nea Salamis is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.2 pts / game - Nea Salamis · 0.88 pts / game - Ayia Napa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nea Salamis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 84%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Ayia Napa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +12 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +10 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nea Salamis
Ayia Napa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Nea Salamis | Liga | Ayia Napa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.40 | 2.65 | • 2.72 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 49% | ▼ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 48% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 30% | ▼ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 72% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 76% | ▼ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Nea SalamisGoalGeorgios Christodoulou
- Nea SalamisGoalAldair Adulai Djaló Baldé
- Nea SalamisGoalAldair Adulai Djaló Baldé
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Nea Salamis's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Ayia Napa. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Nea Salamis vs Ayia Napa?
The Second Division match finished Nea Salamis 3:0 Ayia Napa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nea Salamis vs Ayia Napa?
Nea Salamis score 1.88 goals per game on average and Ayia Napa 1.32. The Second Division average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Nea Salamis's matches and 44% of Ayia Napa's.
What form are Nea Salamis and Ayia Napa in?
Over the last 5 games Nea Salamis have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Ayia Napa 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nea Salamis vs Ayia Napa?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


