Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 23 July 2026

Nea Salamis vs Doxa: match statistics

Nea Salamis crest
Nea Salamis
2 : 1half-time 2:0
Doxa crest
Doxa
165%(1.30)
X22%(4.70)
213%(8.40)

Nea Salamis is displaying impressive form, sitting top of the table with a remarkable record of 20 wins, 3 draws, and no defeats this season. The hosts are particularly strong at home, winning 82% of their home matches while conceding only 0.36 goals per game on average and keeping 64% clean sheets. Doxa, despite a decent away record (64% wins), trails the hosts in all key metrics – a lower conversion rate (17% vs 10%), an inferior average xG (1.57 vs 1.97), and a clearly weaker defense on the road (1.09 goals conceded). The recent form over the last five matches also favors the hosts: Nea Salamis averages 2.6 points per game, while Doxa manages only 1.4. The quality gap, especially considering the home advantage and the hosts' unbeaten run, makes a Nea Salamis victory the most likely outcome of this match.

Nea Salamis vs Doxa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nea Salamis play Doxa in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 18 March 2026 at 14:30. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Nea Salamis: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Doxa: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nea Salamis scores 1.93 and concedes 0.54 goals per match. Doxa scores 1.17 and concedes 1.21. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nea Salamis 39%, Doxa 45%. Over 2.5: Nea Salamis 46%, Doxa 41%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Nea Salamis has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.44. Nea Salamis: 10.2 shots per match, Doxa: 5.9.

Match halves

Nea Salamis: half-time lead 61%, second-half goals 0.79. Doxa: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.72.

Goals by minute

Nea Salamis: 16-30 (13 goals). Doxa: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Nea Salamis is displaying impressive form, sitting top of the table with a remarkable record of 20 wins, 3 draws, and no defeats this season. The hosts are particularly strong at home, winning 82% of their home matches while conceding only 0.36 goals per game on average and keeping 64% clean sheets. Doxa, despite a decent away record (64% wins), trails the hosts in all key metrics – a lower conversion rate (17% vs 10%), an inferior average xG (1.57 vs 1.97), and a clearly weaker defense on the road (1.09 goals conceded). The recent form over the last five matches also favors the hosts: Nea Salamis averages 2.6 points per game, while Doxa manages only 1.4. The quality gap, especially considering the home advantage and the hosts' unbeaten run, makes a Nea Salamis victory the most likely outcome of this match.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Nea SalamisDoxa
-1Shots-1
Nea SalamisDoxa
-1Shots on target-1
Nea SalamisDoxa
0xG0
Nea SalamisDoxa
6Corners4
Nea SalamisDoxa
54Dangerous attacks51
Nea SalamisDoxa
-1Fouls-1
Nea SalamisDoxa
-1Cards-1
Nea SalamisDoxa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.93Goals scored / match1.17
Nea SalamisDoxa
0.54Goals conceded / match1.21
Nea SalamisDoxa
40%Average possession31%
Nea SalamisDoxa
3.93Shots on target / match1.97
Nea SalamisDoxa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.18Shots per match5.86
Nea SalamisDoxa
3.93Shots on target1.97
Nea SalamisDoxa
18.9%Shot conversion20%
Nea SalamisDoxa
40%Possession31%
Nea SalamisDoxa
1.81xG for1.44
Nea SalamisDoxa
0.94xG against1.41
Nea SalamisDoxa

Shooting quality

Nea Salamis: Counter-attackingDoxa: Counter-attacking
Nea SalamisDoxa
Accuracy (shots on target)39%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.25
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.490.59

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nea Salamis is 150% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Nea Salamis · 0.8 pts / match - Doxa

Nea Salamis
WDWLW
Season result split
82% W14% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
23-4-1
2.61 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-2-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.73Opponent xG: 0.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Doxa
LDWLL
Season result split
41% W21% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-6-11
1.45 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WDLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.15Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nea Salamis is 65% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - Nea Salamis · 1.17 goals / match - Doxa

Nea Salamis is 124% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.54 goals / match - Nea Salamis · 1.21 goals / match - Doxa

Nea Salamis scoring profile: very strong

Nea Salamis scores in 86% of matches (24 of 28 matches), while Doxa keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

Doxa scoring profile: mixed

Doxa scores in 69% of matches (20 of 29 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 57% (16 of 28 matches).

54Goals scored (season)34
Nea SalamisDoxa
15Goals conceded (season)35
Nea SalamisDoxa
2.46Average goals in match2.38
Nea SalamisDoxa
11Goals scored (last 5)4
Nea SalamisDoxa
5Goals conceded (last 5)10
Nea SalamisDoxa

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal69%
Nea SalamisDoxa
68%2 goals41%
Nea SalamisDoxa
25%3 goals3%
Nea SalamisDoxa
14%4 goals3%
Nea SalamisDoxa

How often they concede at least...

43%1 goal69%
Nea SalamisDoxa
11%2 goals34%
Nea SalamisDoxa
0%3 goals10%
Nea SalamisDoxa
0%4 goals3%
Nea SalamisDoxa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time17%
Nea SalamisDoxa
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Nea SalamisDoxa
46%Scored in both halves17%
Nea SalamisDoxa

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS34%
Nea SalamisDoxa
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Nea SalamisDoxa
60%BTTS - last 540%
Nea SalamisDoxa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Nea SalamisDoxa
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
Nea SalamisDoxa
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Nea SalamisDoxa

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Nea SalamisDoxa
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
Nea SalamisDoxa
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Nea SalamisDoxa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nea Salamis is 107% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.21 pts / match - Nea Salamis · 1.07 pts / match - Doxa

Nea Salamis - half-time state
61% leading39% draw0% trailing
Doxa - half-time state
21% leading45% draw34% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.21Points per match (1st half)1.07
Nea SalamisDoxa
1.14Goals scored (1st half)0.45
Nea SalamisDoxa
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
Nea SalamisDoxa
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.1
Nea SalamisDoxa
79%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Nea SalamisDoxa
29%No goal before half-time62%
Nea SalamisDoxa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.89Points per match (2nd half)1.59
Nea SalamisDoxa
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
Nea SalamisDoxa
0.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
Nea SalamisDoxa
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.28
Nea SalamisDoxa
71%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Nea SalamisDoxa
39%No goal after half-time52%
Nea SalamisDoxa

Nea Salamis - second-half results

50% W39% R11% P
62
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+26
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 61% of matches and wins 82%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Doxa - second-half results

45% W24% R31% P
31
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding195%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nea Salamis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+7-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8
Doxa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nea Salamis
ScoredConceded
10
1
0-15
13
3
16-30
9
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
5
4
61-75
13
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (13 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

Doxa
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
5
7
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
4
46-60
5
6
61-75
13
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nea Salamis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
41%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Doxa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Nea SalamisLigaDoxa
Average goals in match 2.462.72 2.38
Both teams scored 39%49% 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%49% 41%
Clean sheets 57%30% 31%
Goal before half-time 71%72% 66%
Goal after half-time 71%77% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Nea Salamis 2 - 0 - 0 Doxa. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Doxa
0 : 2
Nea Salamis
Doxa
0 : 1
Nea Salamis

FAQ

What was the result of Nea Salamis vs Doxa?

The Second Division match finished Nea Salamis 2:1 Doxa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nea Salamis and Doxa?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nea Salamis won 2, Doxa won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nea Salamis vs Doxa?

Nea Salamis score 1.93 goals per game on average and Doxa 1.17. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Nea Salamis's matches and 45% of Doxa's.

What form are Nea Salamis and Doxa in?

Over the last 5 games Nea Salamis have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Doxa 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nea Salamis vs Doxa?

The statistical background for Nea Salamis vs Doxa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.