Nea Salamis vs Doxa: match statistics
Nea Salamis is displaying impressive form, sitting top of the table with a remarkable record of 20 wins, 3 draws, and no defeats this season. The hosts are particularly strong at home, winning 82% of their home matches while conceding only 0.36 goals per game on average and keeping 64% clean sheets. Doxa, despite a decent away record (64% wins), trails the hosts in all key metrics – a lower conversion rate (17% vs 10%), an inferior average xG (1.57 vs 1.97), and a clearly weaker defense on the road (1.09 goals conceded). The recent form over the last five matches also favors the hosts: Nea Salamis averages 2.6 points per game, while Doxa manages only 1.4. The quality gap, especially considering the home advantage and the hosts' unbeaten run, makes a Nea Salamis victory the most likely outcome of this match.
Nea Salamis vs Doxa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nea Salamis played against Doxa in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on March 18, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Nea Salamis has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Doxa has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Nea Salamis scores 1.87 goals per game and allows 0.43. Doxa scores 1.25 and allows 1.04. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 35% of Nea Salamis's games and 46% of Doxa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 38%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nea Salamis has the higher season xG average, 1.93 to 1.45 per game. Nea Salamis takes 12.1 shots per game, while Doxa takes 6.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Nea Salamis leads at halftime in 61% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Doxa leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.79 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nea Salamis's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Doxa, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nea Salamis is displaying impressive form, sitting top of the table with a remarkable record of 20 wins, 3 draws, and no defeats this season. The hosts are particularly strong at home, winning 82% of their home matches while conceding only 0.36 goals per game on average and keeping 64% clean sheets. Doxa, despite a decent away record (64% wins), trails the hosts in all key metrics – a lower conversion rate (17% vs 10%), an inferior average xG (1.57 vs 1.97), and a clearly weaker defense on the road (1.09 goals conceded). The recent form over the last five matches also favors the hosts: Nea Salamis averages 2.6 points per game, while Doxa manages only 1.4. The quality gap, especially considering the home advantage and the hosts' unbeaten run, makes a Nea Salamis victory the most likely outcome of this match.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nea Salamis | Doxa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.21 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.52 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nea Salamis is 86% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Nea Salamis · 1.4 pts / game - Doxa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nea Salamis is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.87 goals / game - Nea Salamis · 1.25 goals / game - Doxa
Nea Salamis is 142% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.43 goals / game - Nea Salamis · 1.04 goals / game - Doxa
Nea Salamis scores in 87% of games (20 of 23 meczów), while Doxa keeps a clean sheet in 29% (7 of 24 meczów).
Doxa scores in 71% of games (17 of 24 meczów), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 65% (15 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nea Salamis
Over / Under - Doxa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nea Salamis is 106% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.22 pts / game - Nea Salamis · 1.08 pts / game - Doxa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nea Salamis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 61% of games and wins 87%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Doxa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +13 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nea Salamis
Doxa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Nea Salamis | Liga | Doxa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.30 | 2.59 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 35% | 48% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 39% | 47% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 65% | 30% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 76% | ▲ 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Nea SalamisGoalDaniel Alejandro Pérez Córdova
- DoxaGoalNicolae Milinceanu
Head-to-head
Record from Nea Salamis's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against Doxa. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Nea Salamis vs Doxa?
The Second Division match finished Nea Salamis 2:1 Doxa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nea Salamis and Doxa?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nea Salamis won 2, Doxa won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nea Salamis vs Doxa?
Nea Salamis score 1.87 goals per game on average and Doxa 1.25. The Second Division average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Nea Salamis's matches and 46% of Doxa's.
What form are Nea Salamis and Doxa in?
Over the last 5 games Nea Salamis have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Doxa 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nea Salamis vs Doxa?
The statistical background for Nea Salamis vs Doxa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.