Nea Salamis vs Karmiotissa: match statistics
Nea Salamis vs Karmiotissa: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nea Salamis played against Karmiotissa in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on December 12, 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Nea Salamis has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 3.00 points per game. Karmiotissa has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Nea Salamis scores 1.91 goals per game and allows 0.45. Karmiotissa scores 2.10 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.60 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 36% of Nea Salamis's games and 60% of Karmiotissa's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 80%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nea Salamis has the higher season xG average, 2.05 to 1.78 per game. Nea Salamis takes 13.7 shots per game, while Karmiotissa takes 11.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Nea Salamis leads at halftime in 45% of its games and scores 1.09 goals per game after halftime. Karmiotissa leads at halftime in 70% and scores 0.80 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nea Salamis's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Karmiotissa, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.60 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nea Salamis | Karmiotissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 46% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Nea Salamis is 88% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / game - Nea Salamis · 1.6 pts / game - Karmiotissa
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Karmiotissa is 10% better for: goals scored per game.
1.91 goals / game - Nea Salamis · 2.1 goals / game - Karmiotissa
Nea Salamis is 167% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.45 goals / game - Nea Salamis · 1.2 goals / game - Karmiotissa
Nea Salamis scores in 91% of games (10 of 11 meczów), while Karmiotissa keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 meczów).
Karmiotissa scores in 90% of games (9 of 10 meczów), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 64% (7 of 11 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nea Salamis
Over / Under - Karmiotissa
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Karmiotissa is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.91 pts / game - Nea Salamis · 2.3 pts / game - Karmiotissa
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nea Salamis - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 91%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Karmiotissa - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 70% of games and wins 60%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nea Salamis
Karmiotissa
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Nea Salamis | Liga | Karmiotissa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.36 | 2.60 | ▲ 3.30 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 36% | 52% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 45% | 46% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 64% | 28% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 69% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 79% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Nea Salamis vs Karmiotissa?
The Second Division match finished Nea Salamis 0:0 Karmiotissa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nea Salamis vs Karmiotissa?
Nea Salamis score 1.91 goals per game on average and Karmiotissa 2.10. The Second Division average is 2.60 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 36% of Nea Salamis's matches and 60% of Karmiotissa's.
What form are Nea Salamis and Karmiotissa in?
Over the last 5 games Nea Salamis have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Karmiotissa 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nea Salamis vs Karmiotissa?
The statistical background for Nea Salamis vs Karmiotissa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.