Nea Salamis vs PAEEK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Nea Salamis play PAEEK in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 28 November 2025 at 18:00. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Nea Salamis: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. PAEEK: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Nea Salamis scores 1.93 and concedes 0.54 goals per match. PAEEK scores 1.45 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Nea Salamis 39%, PAEEK 48%. Over 2.5: Nea Salamis 46%, PAEEK 48%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

Nea Salamis has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.40. Nea Salamis: 10.2 shots per match, PAEEK: 6.7.

Match halves

Nea Salamis: half-time lead 61%, second-half goals 0.79. PAEEK: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Nea Salamis: 16-30 (13 goals). PAEEK: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

46Possession (%)54
Nea SalamisPAEEK
12Shots4
Nea SalamisPAEEK
4Shots on target1
Nea SalamisPAEEK
1.38xG0.59
Nea SalamisPAEEK
4Corners5
Nea SalamisPAEEK
47Dangerous attacks36
Nea SalamisPAEEK
13Fouls11
Nea SalamisPAEEK
0Cards0
Nea SalamisPAEEK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.93Goals scored / match1.45
Nea SalamisPAEEK
0.54Goals conceded / match1.07
Nea SalamisPAEEK
40%Average possession39%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
3.93Shots on target / match3.17
Nea SalamisPAEEK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.18Shots per match6.72
Nea SalamisPAEEK
3.93Shots on target3.17
Nea SalamisPAEEK
18.9%Shot conversion21.5%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
40%Possession39%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
1.81xG for1.4
Nea SalamisPAEEK
0.94xG against1.25
Nea SalamisPAEEK

Shooting quality

Nea Salamis: Counter-attackingPAEEK: Counter-attacking
Nea SalamisPAEEK
Accuracy (shots on target)39%47%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.180.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.490.46

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Nea Salamis is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Nea Salamis · 1.2 pts / match - PAEEK

Nea Salamis
WDWLW
Season result split
82% W14% R4% P
Season (W-D-L)
23-4-1
2.61 pts / match · goal difference +39
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
12-2-0
Last 5 at home
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.73Opponent xG: 0.82BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
PAEEK
WDDLD
Season result split
41% W34% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-7
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nea Salamis is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.93 goals / match - Nea Salamis · 1.45 goals / match - PAEEK

Nea Salamis is 98% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.54 goals / match - Nea Salamis · 1.07 goals / match - PAEEK

Nea Salamis scoring profile: strong

Nea Salamis scores in 86% of matches (24 of 28 matches), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 48% (14 of 29 matches).

PAEEK scoring profile: mixed

PAEEK scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Nea Salamis keeps a clean sheet in 57% (16 of 28 matches).

54Goals scored (season)42
Nea SalamisPAEEK
15Goals conceded (season)31
Nea SalamisPAEEK
2.46Average goals in match2.52
Nea SalamisPAEEK
11Goals scored (last 5)8
Nea SalamisPAEEK
5Goals conceded (last 5)10
Nea SalamisPAEEK

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal72%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
68%2 goals45%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
25%3 goals24%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
14%4 goals3%
Nea SalamisPAEEK

How often they concede at least...

43%1 goal52%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
11%2 goals31%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
0%3 goals10%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
0%4 goals7%
Nea SalamisPAEEK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time28%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
7%BTTS in both halves0%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
46%Scored in both halves21%
Nea SalamisPAEEK

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
60%BTTS - last 560%
Nea SalamisPAEEK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
39%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
Nea SalamisPAEEK

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time62%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
Nea SalamisPAEEK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Nea Salamis is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.21 pts / match - Nea Salamis · 1.38 pts / match - PAEEK

Nea Salamis - half-time state
61% leading39% draw0% trailing
PAEEK - half-time state
28% leading55% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.21Points per match (1st half)1.38
Nea SalamisPAEEK
1.14Goals scored (1st half)0.86
Nea SalamisPAEEK
0.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
Nea SalamisPAEEK
1.36Average goals (1st half)1.48
Nea SalamisPAEEK
79%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
29%No goal before half-time48%
Nea SalamisPAEEK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.89Points per match (2nd half)1.31
Nea SalamisPAEEK
0.79Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
Nea SalamisPAEEK
0.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
Nea SalamisPAEEK
1.11Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Nea SalamisPAEEK
71%Clean sheet after half-time66%
Nea SalamisPAEEK
39%No goal after half-time59%
Nea SalamisPAEEK

Nea Salamis - second-half results

50% W39% R11% P
62
Half-time points
32
Half-time goals
+26
Goal difference (1st half)
53
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 61% of matches and wins 82%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PAEEK - second-half results

28% W48% R24% P
40
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nea Salamis - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match1.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+7-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 8
PAEEK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match1.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Nea Salamis
ScoredConceded
10
1
0-15
13
3
16-30
9
2
31-45
4
3
46-60
5
4
61-75
13
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (13 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +11 - wins late phases.

PAEEK
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
9
4
16-30
10
4
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Nea Salamis

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.40
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
41%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

PAEEK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
109%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Nea SalamisLigaPAEEK
Average goals in match 2.462.72 2.52
Both teams scored 39%49% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%49% 48%
Clean sheets 57%30% 48%
Goal before half-time 71%72% 66%
Goal after half-time 71%77% 62%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Nea Salamis 1 - 1 - 0 PAEEK. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Nea Salamis vs PAEEK?

The Second Division match finished Nea Salamis 2:1 PAEEK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nea Salamis and PAEEK?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Nea Salamis won 1, PAEEK won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nea Salamis vs PAEEK?

Nea Salamis score 1.93 goals per game on average and PAEEK 1.45. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 39% of Nea Salamis's matches and 48% of PAEEK's.

What form are Nea Salamis and PAEEK in?

Over the last 5 games Nea Salamis have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and PAEEK 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nea Salamis vs PAEEK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nea Salamis vs PAEEK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.