Neom SC vs Al Fateh: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates a tightly contested matchup between two teams from the lower part of the table. Neom SC sits 8th with poor home form, registering a win rate of just 33% and a negative goal difference (-4). Despite sitting 10th, Al Fateh displays superior recent form with three victories in their last five outings and a higher PPG (1.8 vs 1.4). Both teams share identical shot conversion rates (9%) and similar xG averages, suggesting comparable attacking potential. A defining factor is the defensive frailty of both squads—Neom concedes an average of 1.83 goals per home game, while Al Fateh allows 2.0 on the road. Considering the balanced quality, the hosts' struggles at home, and the visitors' recent resurgence, a draw appears the most likely outcome, though a marginal advantage is retained for the hosts due to home advantage.
Neom SC vs Al Fateh: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Neom SC played against Al Fateh in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The game was played on January 10, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Neom SC has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Al Fateh has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Neom SC scores 1.50 goals per game and allows 1.58. Al Fateh scores 1.25 and allows 1.83. Games in this league average 3.09 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 83% of Neom SC's games and 67% of Al Fateh's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 58%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Al Fateh has the higher season xG average, 1.44 to 1.33 per game. Neom SC takes 12.5 shots per game, while Al Fateh takes 12.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Neom SC leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Al Fateh leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Neom SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Al Fateh, it is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Professional League games average 3.09 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates a tightly contested matchup between two teams from the lower part of the table. Neom SC sits 8th with poor home form, registering a win rate of just 33% and a negative goal difference (-4). Despite sitting 10th, Al Fateh displays superior recent form with three victories in their last five outings and a higher PPG (1.8 vs 1.4). Both teams share identical shot conversion rates (9%) and similar xG averages, suggesting comparable attacking potential. A defining factor is the defensive frailty of both squads—Neom concedes an average of 1.83 goals per home game, while Al Fateh allows 2.0 on the road. Considering the balanced quality, the hosts' struggles at home, and the visitors' recent resurgence, a draw appears the most likely outcome, though a marginal advantage is retained for the hosts due to home advantage.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Neom SC | Al Fateh | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Al Fateh is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Neom SC · 1.8 pts / game - Al Fateh
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Neom SC is 20% better for: goals scored per game.
1.5 goals / game - Neom SC · 1.25 goals / game - Al Fateh
Neom SC is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.58 goals / game - Neom SC · 1.83 goals / game - Al Fateh
Neom SC scores in 92% of games (11 of 12 meczów), while Al Fateh keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 meczów).
Al Fateh scores in 83% of games (10 of 12 meczów), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Neom SC
Over / Under - Al Fateh
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Neom SC is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - Neom SC · 1.17 pts / game - Al Fateh
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Neom SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Al Fateh - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Neom SC
Al Fateh
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).
Teams vs league
| Neom SC | Liga | Al Fateh | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.08 | 3.09 | • 3.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 83% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 58% | • 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 23% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 74% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 80% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Neom SC vs Al Fateh?
The Professional League match finished Neom SC 0:1 Al Fateh. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Neom SC vs Al Fateh?
Neom SC score 1.50 goals per game on average and Al Fateh 1.25. The Professional League average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Neom SC's matches and 67% of Al Fateh's.
What form are Neom SC and Al Fateh in?
Over the last 5 games Neom SC have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Al Fateh 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Neom SC vs Al Fateh?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Neom SC vs Al Fateh: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.