Saudi Arabia - Professional LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Neom SC vs Al Taawon: match statistics

Neom SC crest
Neom SC
2 : 2half-time 1:0
Al Taawon crest
Al Taawon
130%(2.09)
X25%(3.22)
245%(2.93)

Al Taawon present clearly better form and stats than Neom SC. The visitors sit 5th in the table with a 50% away win rate, while the hosts are in 8th position with a mere 33% home win rate and a high 58% home loss rate. Al Taawon have a positive away goal difference (+5), whereas Neom SC have a negative goal difference in home matches (-6). The visitors' shot conversion rate (17%) is nearly twice as high as the hosts' (9%), indicating greater attacking efficiency. Form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (1.0 PPG) compared to the hosts' poor disposition (0.8 PPG and an LWDLL streak). Taking all these factors into account, Al Taawon have a tangible advantage and should claim three points in this clash.

Neom SC vs Al Taawon: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Neom SC play Al Taawon in Professional League (Saudi Arabia). The match date is 12 March 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Neom SC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Al Taawon: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Neom SC scores 1.26 and concedes 1.41 goals per match. Al Taawon scores 1.74 and concedes 1.35. League average: 3.01 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Neom SC 65%, Al Taawon 65%. Over 2.5: Neom SC 53%, Al Taawon 53%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Neom SC has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.32. Neom SC: 13.0 shots per match, Al Taawon: 11.8.

Match halves

Neom SC: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.65. Al Taawon: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Neom SC: 76-90+ (11 goals). Al Taawon: 61-75 (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Professional League: 3.01 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Al Taawon present clearly better form and stats than Neom SC. The visitors sit 5th in the table with a 50% away win rate, while the hosts are in 8th position with a mere 33% home win rate and a high 58% home loss rate. Al Taawon have a positive away goal difference (+5), whereas Neom SC have a negative goal difference in home matches (-6). The visitors' shot conversion rate (17%) is nearly twice as high as the hosts' (9%), indicating greater attacking efficiency. Form over the last 5 matches also favors the visitors (1.0 PPG) compared to the hosts' poor disposition (0.8 PPG and an LWDLL streak). Taking all these factors into account, Al Taawon have a tangible advantage and should claim three points in this clash.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

45Possession (%)55
Neom SCAl Taawon
17Shots14
Neom SCAl Taawon
7Shots on target6
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.89xG1.81
Neom SCAl Taawon
5Corners2
Neom SCAl Taawon
46Dangerous attacks70
Neom SCAl Taawon
11Fouls10
Neom SCAl Taawon
3Cards4
Neom SCAl Taawon

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.26Goals scored / match1.74
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.41Goals conceded / match1.35
Neom SCAl Taawon
53%Average possession52%
Neom SCAl Taawon
4.71Shots on target / match4.12
Neom SCAl Taawon

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13Shots per match11.79
Neom SCAl Taawon
4.71Shots on target4.12
Neom SCAl Taawon
9.7%Shot conversion14.7%
Neom SCAl Taawon
53%Possession52%
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.43xG for1.32
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.34xG against1.47
Neom SCAl Taawon

Shooting quality

Neom SC: BalancedAl Taawon: Efficient finishing
Neom SCAl Taawon
Accuracy (shots on target)36%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Neom SC is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Neom SC · 0.8 pts / match - Al Taawon

Neom SC
DDWLD
Season result split
35% W26% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-13
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-4-7
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DWDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Al Taawon
LWLDL
Season result split
44% W24% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-8-11
1.56 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
8-3-6
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Al Taawon is 38% better for: goals scored per match.

1.26 goals / match - Neom SC · 1.74 goals / match - Al Taawon

Neom SC scoring profile: very strong

Neom SC scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Al Taawon keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

Al Taawon scoring profile: very strong

Al Taawon scores in 82% of matches (28 of 34 matches), while Neom SC keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 matches).

43Goals scored (season)59
Neom SCAl Taawon
48Goals conceded (season)46
Neom SCAl Taawon
2.68Average goals in match3.09
Neom SCAl Taawon
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Neom SCAl Taawon
7Goals conceded (last 5)8
Neom SCAl Taawon

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal82%
Neom SCAl Taawon
32%2 goals47%
Neom SCAl Taawon
12%3 goals21%
Neom SCAl Taawon
3%4 goals12%
Neom SCAl Taawon

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal82%
Neom SCAl Taawon
41%2 goals41%
Neom SCAl Taawon
18%3 goals6%
Neom SCAl Taawon
0%4 goals3%
Neom SCAl Taawon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time21%
Neom SCAl Taawon
12%BTTS in both halves3%
Neom SCAl Taawon
24%Scored in both halves29%
Neom SCAl Taawon

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Neom SCAl Taawon
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Neom SCAl Taawon
80%BTTS - last 560%
Neom SCAl Taawon

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Neom SCAl Taawon
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Neom SCAl Taawon
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Neom SCAl Taawon

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Neom SCAl Taawon
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Neom SCAl Taawon
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Neom SCAl Taawon

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Al Taawon is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - Neom SC · 1.5 pts / match - Al Taawon

Neom SC - half-time state
32% leading44% draw24% trailing
Al Taawon - half-time state
38% leading35% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.5
Neom SCAl Taawon
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.74
Neom SCAl Taawon
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.21
Neom SCAl Taawon
59%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Neom SCAl Taawon
53%No goal before half-time50%
Neom SCAl Taawon

After half-time (2nd half)

1.15Points per match (2nd half)1.38
Neom SCAl Taawon
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)1
Neom SCAl Taawon
0.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Neom SCAl Taawon
1.56Average goals (2nd half)1.88
Neom SCAl Taawon
35%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Neom SCAl Taawon
44%No goal after half-time38%
Neom SCAl Taawon

Neom SC - second-half results

26% W35% R38% P
48
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding109%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Al Taawon - second-half results

32% W41% R26% P
51
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding116%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Neom SC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Al Taawon - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Neom SC
ScoredConceded
8
8
0-15
8
3
16-30
5
6
31-45
8
10
46-60
3
8
61-75
11
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Al Taawon
ScoredConceded
9
2
0-15
6
6
16-30
10
8
31-45
11
9
46-60
15
6
61-75
8
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (15 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-31%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
65%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Neom SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Al Taawon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.76
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Professional League).

Teams vs league

Neom SCLigaAl Taawon
Average goals in match 2.683.01 3.09
Both teams scored 65%58% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 53%
Clean sheets 18%23% 18%
Goal before half-time 68%75% 74%
Goal after half-time 82%80% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.01
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.59
Home goals / match
1.42
Away goals / match
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Neom SC 0 - 1 - 0 Al Taawon. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Neom SC vs Al Taawon?

The Professional League match finished Neom SC 2:2 Al Taawon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Neom SC vs Al Taawon?

Neom SC score 1.26 goals per game on average and Al Taawon 1.74. The Professional League average is 3.01 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Neom SC's matches and 65% of Al Taawon's.

What form are Neom SC and Al Taawon in?

Over the last 5 games Neom SC have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Al Taawon 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Neom SC vs Al Taawon?

The statistical background for Neom SC vs Al Taawon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.