United States - MLS Next ProData current as of September 07, 2026

New England II vs Chicago Fire II: match statistics

New England II vs Chicago Fire II: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

New England II played against Chicago Fire II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The game was played on June 21, 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

New England II has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Chicago Fire II has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

New England II scores 1.31 goals per game and allows 0.85. Chicago Fire II scores 1.31 and allows 1.54. Games in this league average 3.25 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 54% of New England II's games and 62% of Chicago Fire II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 77%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

New England II has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.53 per game. New England II takes 13.8 shots per game, while Chicago Fire II takes 12.9.

First-half and second-half trends

New England II leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. Chicago Fire II leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.54 after halftime.

When the teams score

New England II's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Chicago Fire II, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS Next Pro games average 3.25 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

New England II has a clear advantage at home: they win 63% of home matches, score an average of 1.5 goals and concede only 0.88 per game, while Chicago Fire II have yet to win away (0% wins), average 0.67 goals scored and concede 1.67. The hosts generate 1.68 xG per home match with 5 shots on target and 11% conversion, whereas the visitors have 1.43 xG away, 4 shots on target and only 5% conversion, indicating higher quality chances created by New England. In the last 5 matches New England are 4–1 with 7 goals for and 3 against (PPG 2.6), while Chicago have scored 11 goals over a 3–2 run, but that offensive output does not translate to away effectiveness (avg. 0.67 goals per away match). Additionally, the hosts record 38% clean sheets at home versus 17% for the visitors on the road, and the difference in average goals conceded (0.88 vs 1.67) plus superior successful goal situations favors New England’s defense; therefore I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes because league and seasonal indicators support both teams scoring: New England II has BTTS in 57% of home matches, Chicago Fire II in 67% of away matches, and the league average is 62%. Both sides produce comparable expected chances: xG 1.63 for New England vs 1.43 for Chicago, with xG against 1.41 and 1.34 respectively, and average shots 13.14 vs 12.67 with shots on target 3.29 vs 4.0. Additionally, the high share of matches over 2.5 goals (86% for the home side, 67% for the away) and instances of simultaneous over 2.5 & BTTS (56% home, 50% away) point to a strong likelihood of a multi-goal game. The counterargument is New England’s recent form over the last 5 games: 7 goals scored (1.4 avg) and only 3 conceded (0.6 avg), with BTTS at 40% in that period, which reduces the chance of the home side conceding. Nevertheless, given the seasonal 57%/67%, the league 62% and Chicago’s offensive tempo (11 goals in last 5, 2.2 avg), I assess BTTS at 70% vs 30% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

New England II averages 1.86 goals per match with xG 1.63, while Chicago Fire II has 0.67 goals per match with xG 1.43. Combining each offense with the opponent's defense (xG against: Chicago 1.34, New England 1.41) yields expected goals of 1.67 for New England and 1.05 for Chicago, totaling 2.72 goals. Both teams frequently score — BTTS rate is 57% for New England and 67% for Chicago, and the percentage of matches over 1.5 goals is 86% and 83%, respectively, which further supports the likelihood of Over. A Poisson model with lambda=2.72 gives probabilities of approximately 76% for Over 1.5, 51% for Over 2.5 and 29% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, the home side has higher shot efficiency (conversion rate 14% vs 5%) and form of 4 wins and 1 draw in the last 5, therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Hosts led at the break in 4 of 7 matches (57%) and score an average of 1.14 goals by half-time versus 0.33 for Chicago Fire II — a cumulative 12 home goals at the break vs 4 for the visitors — indicating New England II’s advantage in the first 45 minutes. Over full matches New England II win 57% of home games while Chicago Fire II have 0% wins; the hosts average 1.86 goals per game with a 14% shot conversion compared to 0.67 goals and 5% for the visitors, so a home victory is the most likely outcome. xG confirms a slight home edge (1.63 vs 1.43), and both teams score during matches more often (57% vs 67%) than they do before the break (29% vs 17%), suggesting first halves most often finish with one side leading. Additionally, in 86% of matches hosts scored after the break and visitors did so in 83% of matches, so the scenario draw at half-time and home turnaround to win (X/1) is a reasonable alternative. On that basis I select 1/1 as the primary pick: New England II leading at half-time and the hosts winning the match.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

37Possession (%)63
New England IIChicago Fire II
14Shots11
New England IIChicago Fire II
6Shots on target6
New England IIChicago Fire II
1.82xG1.5
New England IIChicago Fire II
8Corners5
New England IIChicago Fire II
72Dangerous attacks53
New England IIChicago Fire II
14Fouls9
New England IIChicago Fire II
0Cards1
New England IIChicago Fire II

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

New England IIChicago Fire II
1.31Goals scored / game1.31
New England IIChicago Fire II
0.85Goals allowed / game1.54
New England IIChicago Fire II
53%Average possession50%
New England IIChicago Fire II
4.92Shots on target / game3.62
New England IIChicago Fire II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.77Shots per game12.92
New England IIChicago Fire II
4.92Shots on target3.62
New England IIChicago Fire II
9.5%Shot conversion10.1%
New England IIChicago Fire II
53%Possession50%
New England IIChicago Fire II
1.7xG for1.53
New England IIChicago Fire II
1.19xG against1.38
New England IIChicago Fire II

Shooting quality

New England II: BalancedChicago Fire II: Balanced
New England IIChicago Fire II
Accuracy (shots on target)36%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

New England II is 44% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - New England II · 1.8 pts / game - Chicago Fire II

New England II
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
54% W31% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-2
1.92 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-1
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.06BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Chicago Fire II
WLWLW
Season result split
31% W23% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-6
1.15 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.36BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

New England II is 81% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.85 goals / game - New England II · 1.54 goals / game - Chicago Fire II

New England II scoring profile: very strong

New England II scores in 85% of games (11 of 13 meczów), while Chicago Fire II keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).

Chicago Fire II scoring profile: mixed

Chicago Fire II scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while New England II keeps a clean sheet in 46% (6 of 13 meczów).

17Goals scored (season)17
New England IIChicago Fire II
11Goals conceded (season)20
New England IIChicago Fire II
2.15Average goals per game2.85
New England IIChicago Fire II
7Goals scored (last 5)11
New England IIChicago Fire II
3Goals conceded (last 5)8
New England IIChicago Fire II

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal69%
New England IIChicago Fire II
38%2 goals31%
New England IIChicago Fire II
8%3 goals23%
New England IIChicago Fire II
0%4 goals8%
New England IIChicago Fire II

How often they concede at least...

54%1 goal77%
New England IIChicago Fire II
31%2 goals54%
New England IIChicago Fire II
0%3 goals23%
New England IIChicago Fire II
0%4 goals0%
New England IIChicago Fire II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time23%
New England IIChicago Fire II
0%BTTS in both halves8%
New England IIChicago Fire II
15%Scored in both halves31%
New England IIChicago Fire II

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS54%
New England IIChicago Fire II
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS23%
New England IIChicago Fire II
40%BTTS - last 560%
New England IIChicago Fire II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
New England IIChicago Fire II
15%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
New England IIChicago Fire II
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
New England IIChicago Fire II

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
New England IIChicago Fire II
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time62%
New England IIChicago Fire II
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
New England IIChicago Fire II

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire II is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / game - New England II · 1.62 pts / game - Chicago Fire II

New England II - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing
Chicago Fire II - half-time state
38% leading46% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per game (1st half)1.62
New England IIChicago Fire II
0.46Goals scored (1st half)0.77
New England IIChicago Fire II
0.38Goals conceded (1st half)0.46
New England IIChicago Fire II
0.85Average goals (1st half)1.23
New England IIChicago Fire II
62%Clean sheet before half-time62%
New England IIChicago Fire II
69%No goal before half-time46%
New England IIChicago Fire II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.77Points per game (2nd half)0.92
New England IIChicago Fire II
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)0.54
New England IIChicago Fire II
0.46Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
New England IIChicago Fire II
1.31Average goals (2nd half)1.62
New England IIChicago Fire II
54%Clean sheet after half-time23%
New England IIChicago Fire II
31%No goal after half-time54%
New England IIChicago Fire II

New England II - second-half results

46% W38% R15% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Chicago Fire II - second-half results

15% W46% R38% P
21
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 31%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

New England II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.80
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+3+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Chicago Fire II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.601.40
Goals scored / game1.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.21.4
Average goals per game1.62.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+6-3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

New England II
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Chicago Fire II
ScoredConceded
2
4
0-15
2
0
16-30
6
2
31-45
3
7
46-60
2
2
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
77%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+60%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

New England II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.51
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Chicago Fire II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.65
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
12% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
12%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).

Teams vs league

New England IILigaChicago Fire II
Average goals per game 2.153.25 2.85
Both teams scored 54%62% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%65% 77%
Clean sheets 46%21% 23%
Goal before half-time 62%75% 69%
Goal after half-time 85%83% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.25
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.80
Home goals / game
1.44
Away goals / game
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chicago Fire IIYellow cardChristopher Cupps
  2. Chicago Fire IIGoalDean BoltzAssist: Richard Fleming
  3. Chicago Fire IIGoalVitaliy HlyutAssist: Damyan Villanueva
  4. New England IIGoalCarlos Zambrano Zarzalejo
  5. New England IISubstitutionOn: Josh MacedoOff: Aarin Prajapati

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from New England II's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss against Chicago Fire II. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

New England Revolution II
0 : 1
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
New England Revolution II
2 : 2
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
Chicago Fire Premier FC II
3 : 4
New England Revolution II

FAQ

What was the result of New England II vs Chicago Fire II?

The MLS Next Pro match finished New England II 1:2 Chicago Fire II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between New England II and Chicago Fire II?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches New England II won 1, Chicago Fire II won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before New England II vs Chicago Fire II?

New England II score 1.31 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire II 1.31. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 54% of New England II's matches and 62% of Chicago Fire II's.

What form are New England II and Chicago Fire II in?

Over the last 5 games New England II have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Chicago Fire II 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New England II vs Chicago Fire II?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for New England II vs Chicago Fire II: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.