New England Revolution vs Chicago Fire: match statistics
Full analysis and pick in the app
Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.
New England Revolution vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
New England Revolution plays Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The game is scheduled for October 17, 2026. Venue: Gillette Stadium.
Recent form
New England Revolution has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Chicago Fire has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
New England Revolution scores 1.61 goals per game and allows 1.39. Chicago Fire scores 1.82 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 3.26 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 61% of New England Revolution's games and 71% of Chicago Fire's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 75%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chicago Fire has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.51 per game. New England Revolution takes 12.5 shots per game, while Chicago Fire takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
New England Revolution leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. Chicago Fire leads at halftime in 39% and scores 1.04 after halftime.
When the teams score
New England Revolution's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (14 goals). For Chicago Fire, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.26 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Before kickoff
1X2 odds
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| New England Revolution | Chicago Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.61 goals / game - New England Revolution · 1.82 goals / game - Chicago Fire
New England Revolution scores in 75% of games (21 of 28 games), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 games).
Chicago Fire scores in 93% of games (26 of 28 games), while New England Revolution keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - New England Revolution
Over / Under - Chicago Fire
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / game - New England Revolution · 1.54 pts / game - Chicago Fire
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
New England Revolution - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Chicago Fire - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
New England Revolution
Chicago Fire
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| New England Revolution | Liga | Chicago Fire | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.26 | • 3.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 61% | 64% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 71% | 64% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 20% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 86% | 78% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 82% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from New England Revolution's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Chicago Fire. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
When do New England Revolution and Chicago Fire play?
New England Revolution face Chicago Fire on October 17, 2026 in MLS at Gillette Stadium. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.
What do the goal statistics show before New England Revolution vs Chicago Fire?
New England Revolution score 1.61 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.82. The MLS average is 3.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 61% of New England Revolution's matches and 71% of Chicago Fire's.
What form are New England Revolution and Chicago Fire in?
Over the last 5 games New England Revolution have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Chicago Fire 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New England Revolution vs Chicago Fire?
The statistical background for New England Revolution vs Chicago Fire — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.