New England Revolution vs FC Cincinnati: match statistics
FC Cincinnati presents a decidedly better form over their last five matches, securing 1.8 PPG compared to just 0.8 PPG for New England Revolution. The visitors have scored as many as 14 goals in their last five fixtures, whereas the hosts have netted only 6 while conceding 11. Although Cincinnati has a 100% loss rate in away matches this season, their overall form (wwllw) and advantage in offensive statistics suggest the potential to break this streak. New England Revolution has not won a single home match this season and holds a negative goal difference, which further weakens their position. Considering the hosts' poor defense and the visitors' offensive potential, I predict an FC Cincinnati victory, although the away side's road form leaves a certain margin of uncertainty.
New England Revolution vs FC Cincinnati: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
New England Revolution played against FC Cincinnati in MLS (United States). The game was played on March 15, 2026. Final score: 6:1.
Recent form
New England Revolution has 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. FC Cincinnati has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
New England Revolution scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 2.50. FC Cincinnati scores 0.67 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.80 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of New England Revolution's games and 0% of FC Cincinnati's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 0%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
FC Cincinnati has the higher season xG average, 1.32 to 0.70 per game. New England Revolution takes 4.5 shots per game, while FC Cincinnati takes 12.7.
First-half and second-half trends
New England Revolution leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. FC Cincinnati leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
New England Revolution's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). For FC Cincinnati, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 2.80 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
FC Cincinnati presents a decidedly better form over their last five matches, securing 1.8 PPG compared to just 0.8 PPG for New England Revolution. The visitors have scored as many as 14 goals in their last five fixtures, whereas the hosts have netted only 6 while conceding 11. Although Cincinnati has a 100% loss rate in away matches this season, their overall form (wwllw) and advantage in offensive statistics suggest the potential to break this streak. New England Revolution has not won a single home match this season and holds a negative goal difference, which further weakens their position. Considering the hosts' poor defense and the visitors' offensive potential, I predict an FC Cincinnati victory, although the away side's road form leaves a certain margin of uncertainty.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| New England Revolution | FC Cincinnati | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Cincinnati is 34% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - New England Revolution · 0.67 goals / game - FC Cincinnati
FC Cincinnati is 273% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.5 goals / game - New England Revolution · 0.67 goals / game - FC Cincinnati
New England Revolution scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 meczów).
FC Cincinnati scores in 33% of games (1 of 3 meczów), while New England Revolution keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - New England Revolution
Over / Under - FC Cincinnati
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FC Cincinnati is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / game - New England Revolution · 1 pts / game - FC Cincinnati
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
New England Revolution - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
FC Cincinnati - second-half results
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 33% |
| No goal | 100% | 67% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
New England Revolution
FC Cincinnati
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| New England Revolution | Liga | FC Cincinnati | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.00 | 2.80 | ▼ 1.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 48% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 29% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 70% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 86% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of New England Revolution vs FC Cincinnati?
The MLS match finished New England Revolution 6:1 FC Cincinnati. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before New England Revolution vs FC Cincinnati?
New England Revolution score 0.50 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati 0.67. The MLS average is 2.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 50% of New England Revolution's matches and 0% of FC Cincinnati's.
What form are New England Revolution and FC Cincinnati in?
Over the last 5 games New England Revolution have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and FC Cincinnati 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New England Revolution vs FC Cincinnati?
The statistical background for New England Revolution vs FC Cincinnati — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.