United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 23 July 2026

New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs: match statistics

130%(1.91)
X25%(3.30)
245%(3.60)

New Mexico United is in very poor form, occupying the 25th and last place in the table with a season record of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 2 losses. The hosts have scored only 1 goal while conceding 3, and their form in the last 5 matches (2-0-3, PPG 1.2) indicates serious issues. Colorado Springs, despite an average position (11th place), shows better form with a record of 1-1-1 and a balanced goal ratio of 5:5 this season. The visitors have averaged 1.4 points per game in their last five matches and scored 8 goals, demonstrating their offensive potential. Although Colorado Springs has not won an away match this season (0% Win%), their xG statistics (1.21 for vs 1.18 against) and better overall form (ldwwl) give them an advantage over the dramatically weak hosts. Taking all factors into account, Colorado Springs has a real chance of securing their first away win.

New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

New Mexico United play Colorado Springs in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 28 March 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

New Mexico United: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Colorado Springs: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

New Mexico United scores 1.36 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. Colorado Springs scores 1.71 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: New Mexico United 50%, Colorado Springs 71%. Over 2.5: New Mexico United 50%, Colorado Springs 64%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.33. New Mexico United: 11.9 shots per match, Colorado Springs: 14.5.

Match halves

New Mexico United: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. Colorado Springs: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

New Mexico United: 61-75 (6 goals). Colorado Springs: 46-60 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

4 H2H matches: 3-1-0. Average goals 1.75, BTTS 50%.

Match description

New Mexico United is in very poor form, occupying the 25th and last place in the table with a season record of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 2 losses. The hosts have scored only 1 goal while conceding 3, and their form in the last 5 matches (2-0-3, PPG 1.2) indicates serious issues. Colorado Springs, despite an average position (11th place), shows better form with a record of 1-1-1 and a balanced goal ratio of 5:5 this season. The visitors have averaged 1.4 points per game in their last five matches and scored 8 goals, demonstrating their offensive potential. Although Colorado Springs has not won an away match this season (0% Win%), their xG statistics (1.21 for vs 1.18 against) and better overall form (ldwwl) give them an advantage over the dramatically weak hosts. Taking all factors into account, Colorado Springs has a real chance of securing their first away win.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

51Possession (%)49
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
17Shots14
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
6Shots on target3
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.73xG1.33
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
7Corners5
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
34Dangerous attacks34
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
13Fouls15
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
4Cards2
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.36Goals scored / match1.71
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.07Goals conceded / match1.57
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
54%Average possession54%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
4.29Shots on target / match3.93
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.86Shots per match14.5
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
4.29Shots on target3.93
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
11.4%Shot conversion11.8%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
54%Possession54%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.33xG for1.66
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.58xG against1.09
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

Shooting quality

New Mexico United: BalancedColorado Springs: Attacking
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
Accuracy (shots on target)36%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

New Mexico United is 22% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - New Mexico United · 1.8 pts / match - Colorado Springs

New Mexico United
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W21% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-4
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Colorado Springs
WLWLW
Season result split
36% W29% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-5
1.36 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 0.91BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Colorado Springs is 26% better for: goals scored per match.

1.36 goals / match - New Mexico United · 1.71 goals / match - Colorado Springs

New Mexico United is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - New Mexico United · 1.57 goals / match - Colorado Springs

New Mexico United scoring profile: very strong

New Mexico United scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).

Colorado Springs scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Springs scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while New Mexico United keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

19Goals scored (season)24
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
15Goals conceded (season)22
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
2.43Average goals in match3.29
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
8Goals scored (last 5)7
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal79%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
36%2 goals57%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
21%3 goals29%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
7%4 goals7%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal93%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
29%2 goals50%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
7%3 goals14%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%4 goals0%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
New Mexico United - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 14 matches
71%
Colorado Springs - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 14 matches
58%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time36%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%BTTS in both halves21%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
14%Scored in both halves36%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
60%BTTS - last 560%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

Full match - team comparison (Over)

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time43%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

New Mexico United is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - New Mexico United · 1.07 pts / match - Colorado Springs

New Mexico United - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing
Colorado Springs - half-time state
14% leading64% draw21% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.07
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.57
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.07Average goals (1st half)1.14
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
57%Clean sheet before half-time43%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
57%No goal before half-time50%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

After half-time (2nd half)

1.43Points per match (2nd half)1.36
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0.71Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)1
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.36Average goals (2nd half)2.14
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
50%Clean sheet after half-time29%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
57%No goal after half-time36%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

New Mexico United - second-half results

36% W36% R29% P
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding172%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Colorado Springs - second-half results

36% W29% R36% P
15
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding257%

Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

New Mexico United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.21.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+4+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Colorado Springs - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

New Mexico United
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
1
1
16-30
5
1
31-45
1
1
46-60
6
4
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (6 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Colorado Springs
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
6
3
46-60
4
6
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.86
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-39%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

New Mexico United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Colorado Springs

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
137%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

New Mexico UnitedLigaColorado Springs
Average goals in match 2.432.79 3.29
Both teams scored 50%58% 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%52% 64%
Clean sheets 29%26% 7%
Goal before half-time 64%67% 71%
Goal after half-time 71%80% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): New Mexico United 3 - 1 - 0 Colorado Springs. Average goals 1.75, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
1 : 2
New Mexico United
New Mexico United
1 : 1
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
Colorado Springs
0 : 1
New Mexico United
New Mexico United
1 : 0
Colorado Springs

FAQ

What was the result of New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs?

The USL Championship match finished New Mexico United 3:2 Colorado Springs. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between New Mexico United and Colorado Springs?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches New Mexico United won 3, Colorado Springs won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs?

New Mexico United score 1.36 goals per game on average and Colorado Springs 1.71. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 50% of New Mexico United's matches and 71% of Colorado Springs's.

What form are New Mexico United and Colorado Springs in?

Over the last 5 games New Mexico United have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Colorado Springs 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.