United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of September 07, 2026

New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs: match statistics

130%(1.91)
X25%(3.30)
245%(3.60)

New Mexico United is in very poor form, occupying the 25th and last place in the table with a season record of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 2 losses. The hosts have scored only 1 goal while conceding 3, and their form in the last 5 matches (2-0-3, PPG 1.2) indicates serious issues. Colorado Springs, despite an average position (11th place), shows better form with a record of 1-1-1 and a balanced goal ratio of 5:5 this season. The visitors have averaged 1.4 points per game in their last five matches and scored 8 goals, demonstrating their offensive potential. Although Colorado Springs has not won an away match this season (0% Win%), their xG statistics (1.21 for vs 1.18 against) and better overall form (ldwwl) give them an advantage over the dramatically weak hosts. Taking all factors into account, Colorado Springs has a real chance of securing their first away win.

New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

New Mexico United played against Colorado Springs in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on March 28, 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Recent form

New Mexico United has 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Colorado Springs has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.33 points per game.

Scoring records

New Mexico United scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 1.50. Colorado Springs scores 1.67 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.74 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of New Mexico United's games and 67% of Colorado Springs's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 67%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Colorado Springs has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.47 per game. New Mexico United takes 13.0 shots per game, while Colorado Springs takes 14.3.

First-half and second-half trends

New Mexico United leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. Colorado Springs leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.33 after halftime.

When the teams score

New Mexico United's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). For Colorado Springs, it is minutes 61-75 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL Championship games average 2.74 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

New Mexico United is in very poor form, occupying the 25th and last place in the table with a season record of 0 wins, 0 draws, and 2 losses. The hosts have scored only 1 goal while conceding 3, and their form in the last 5 matches (2-0-3, PPG 1.2) indicates serious issues. Colorado Springs, despite an average position (11th place), shows better form with a record of 1-1-1 and a balanced goal ratio of 5:5 this season. The visitors have averaged 1.4 points per game in their last five matches and scored 8 goals, demonstrating their offensive potential. Although Colorado Springs has not won an away match this season (0% Win%), their xG statistics (1.21 for vs 1.18 against) and better overall form (ldwwl) give them an advantage over the dramatically weak hosts. Taking all factors into account, Colorado Springs has a real chance of securing their first away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

New Mexico United at home shows a very strong signal for BTTS: 100% BTTS and 0% clean sheets, coupled with a high average scoring output (3.0) and an average conceded (2.0). Colorado Springs away has 0% clean sheets and concedes an average of 1.5 goals, which combined with New Mexico's high xG (2.38) and 8 shots on target per match suggests the hosts should score. The risk for BTTS is the visitors' offense: only 1.0 goal on average away, a low 2 shots on target, and moderate xG (1.21) against New Mexico's low xGA (0.94). However, the last 5 matches show that New Mexico regularly concedes (1.8 GA), and Colorado Springs scores decently (1.6 GF), supporting the scenario of goals from both sides. Overall, the data balance favors BTTS 'Yes', though with a clear caveat regarding the visitors' scoring potential.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile indicates a high-scoring potential: New Mexico has a high seasonal xG (2.38) and a very high number of shots and shots on target (21.0 and 8.0), which supports goal production. Colorado Springs defensively allows chances (xG against 1.18; seasonally 1.5 goals conceded), and both teams record no clean sheets (CS 0%), increasing the likelihood of at least 2 goals. Data from the last 5 matches also favors overs: Over 2.5 has occurred in 80% of home and 60% of away games, with total average xG around the league level (league 2.74) and elevated values in recent form. However, the away attack is less stable (2.0 shots on target and 9% conversion), so the highest confidence lies with the safer line of 1.5. The goal model gives approx. 2.85 expected goals, which translates to a clear edge for Over 1.5 over Under 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The HT data strongly points towards a draw at halftime: both teams have a 100% rate of matches with an HT draw this season, and New Mexico averages neither scoring nor conceding in the first half (scoredAVGHT 0.0, concededAVGHT 0.0, CS%HT 100%). At the same time, the qualitative advantage on the hosts' side is clear on a per-match basis: 3.0 PPG and a 100% win rate versus Colorado Springs' 0.5 PPG and 0% win rate, alongside a better xG (2.38 vs 1.21) and a significant advantage in shots on target (8.0 vs 2.0). The second-half profile favors New Mexico, which has a 100% rate for over 0.5/1.5/2.5 goals in the 2H and a 100% win rate in the 2H, suggesting a stronger finish after the break. Colorado Springs has weaker finishing (9%) and poorer defensive numbers for the season (concededAVG 1.5), so given the expected HT draw, the most logical scenario is a second-half turnaround in favor of the hosts. Therefore, I rate the X/1 variant highest as the most probable HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
3 : 2
Second half

Game stats

51Possession (%)49
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
17Shots14
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
6Shots on target3
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.73xG1.33
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
7Corners5
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
34Dangerous attacks34
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
13Fouls15
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
4Cards2
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0.5Goals scored / game1.67
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.5Goals allowed / game1.67
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
56%Average possession53%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
5Shots on target / game4
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game14.33
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
5Shots on target4
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
3.8%Shot conversion11.6%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
56%Possession53%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.47xG for1.6
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.65xG against1.1
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

Shooting quality

New Mexico United: BalancedColorado Springs: Attacking
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
Accuracy (shots on target)38%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.100.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

New Mexico United
LL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-2
0.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%
Colorado Springs
DWL
Season result split
33% W33% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.7Goals conceded: 1.7xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Colorado Springs is 234% better for: goals scored per game.

0.5 goals / game - New Mexico United · 1.67 goals / game - Colorado Springs

New Mexico United is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - New Mexico United · 1.67 goals / game - Colorado Springs

New Mexico United scoring profile: very strong

New Mexico United scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).

Colorado Springs scoring profile: very strong

Colorado Springs scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while New Mexico United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).

1Goals scored (season)5
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
3Goals conceded (season)5
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
2Average goals per game3.33
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1Goals scored (last 5)5
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal67%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%2 goals67%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%3 goals33%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%4 goals0%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
50%2 goals67%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%3 goals0%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%4 goals0%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%BTTS in both halves33%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%Scored in both halves33%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
50%BTTS - last 567%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time33%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Colorado Springs is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.5 pts / game - New Mexico United · 1 pts / game - Colorado Springs

New Mexico United - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing
Colorado Springs - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.5Points per game (1st half)1
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0Goals scored (1st half)0.33
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0.5Average goals (1st half)0.67
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
50%Clean sheet before half-time67%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
100%No goal before half-time67%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per game (2nd half)1.33
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1.33
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
1.5Average goals (2nd half)2.67
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
0%Clean sheet after half-time0%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs
50%No goal after half-time33%
New Mexico UnitedColorado Springs

New Mexico United - second-half results

0% W50% R50% P
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Colorado Springs - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

New Mexico United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.500.50
Goals scored / game0.00.5
Goals allowed / game0.51.0
Average goals per game0.51.5
1 goal50%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal100%50%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 50% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Colorado Springs - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.33
Goals scored / game0.31.3
Goals allowed / game0.31.3
Average goals per game0.72.7
1 goal33%100%
2 goals33%67%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet67%0%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 33% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

New Mexico United
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Colorado Springs
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-34%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

New Mexico United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.97
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
32%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

Colorado Springs

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.50
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.57
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
142%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

New Mexico UnitedLigaColorado Springs
Average goals per game 2.002.74 3.33
Both teams scored 50%56% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%59% 67%
Clean sheets 0%28% 0%
Goal before half-time 50%62% 33%
Goal after half-time 100%85% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / game
1.18
Away goals / game
+32%
Home attack advantage
+24%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
59%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Colorado SpringsYellow cardBrennan Creek
  2. Colorado SpringsYellow cardJuan Tejada
  3. New Mexico UnitedYellow cardNicholas Hamalainen
  4. New Mexico UnitedYellow cardKristopher Shakes
  5. New Mexico UnitedYellow cardValentin Noël
  6. Colorado SpringsGoalKhori Bennett
  7. New Mexico UnitedGoalDayonn HarrisAssist: Greg Hurst
  8. New Mexico UnitedYellow cardJustin Rennicks
  9. New Mexico UnitedGoalValentin NoëlAssist: Dayonn Harris
  10. Colorado SpringsSubstitutionOn: Levonte JohnsonOff: Juan Tejada
  11. New Mexico UnitedSubstitutionOn: Maliek HowellOff: Greg Hurst
  12. New Mexico UnitedSubstitutionOn: Jake LaCavaOff: Kipp Keller
  13. Colorado SpringsGoalKhori Bennett
  14. New Mexico UnitedGoalOusman JabangAssist: Dayonn Harris

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from New Mexico United's perspective: 3 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Colorado Springs. Games average 1.75 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
1 : 2
New Mexico United
New Mexico United
1 : 1
Colorado Springs Switchbacks FC
Colorado Springs
0 : 1
New Mexico United
New Mexico United
1 : 0
Colorado Springs

FAQ

What was the result of New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs?

The USL Championship match finished New Mexico United 3:2 Colorado Springs. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between New Mexico United and Colorado Springs?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches New Mexico United won 3, Colorado Springs won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs?

New Mexico United score 0.50 goals per game on average and Colorado Springs 1.67. The USL Championship average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 50% of New Mexico United's matches and 67% of Colorado Springs's.

What form are New Mexico United and Colorado Springs in?

Over the last 5 games New Mexico United have a 0-0-2 record (0.00 points per game) and Colorado Springs 1-1-1 (1.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for New Mexico United vs Colorado Springs: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.