United States - MLSData current as of September 08, 2026

New York City vs FC Cincinnati: match statistics

New York City crest
New York City
4 : 4half-time 2:1
FC Cincinnati crest
FC Cincinnati

New York City vs FC Cincinnati: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

New York City played against FC Cincinnati in MLS (United States). The game was played on April 22, 2026. Final score: 4:4.

Recent form

New York City has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. FC Cincinnati has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

New York City scores 1.88 goals per game and allows 1.38. FC Cincinnati scores 1.63 and allows 2.38. Games in this league average 3.18 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 75% of New York City's games and 63% of FC Cincinnati's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 50%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FC Cincinnati has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.54 per game. New York City takes 13.4 shots per game, while FC Cincinnati takes 14.4.

First-half and second-half trends

New York City leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. FC Cincinnati leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.13 after halftime.

When the teams score

New York City's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). For FC Cincinnati, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.18 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

New York City holds a clear home advantage: at home they average 2.4 goals per match with an average xG of 1.65, while FC Cincinnati average 1.0 goals away with xG 1.55. Defensively the visitors are more vulnerable — they concede an average of 3.0 goals on the road (compared to 1.4 conceded by the hosts at home) and in their last five matches Cincinnati have conceded 16 goals (3.2 per game) versus New York’s 10 conceded (2.0 per game). Efficiency also favors NYC: on average 6.4 shots on target and 16% conversion for the hosts versus 5.75 on target and 8% conversion for the visitors; the hosts have not had a goalless home match (0% of home games without scoring), and the visitors have no clean sheets away (0%). Additionally NYC have a 40% win rate at their stadium and a positive home goal difference of +5, while Cincinnati have a 0% away win rate and a negative goal difference of -8, which increases the hosts’ chances. Considering these numbers, I expect a home win, although the match could be high-scoring.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistics strongly indicate BTTS - Yes: season BTTS rate for New York City is 50% versus 75% for FC Cincinnati, and in the last 5 matches 80% and 100% respectively. FC Cincinnati concedes on average 3.0 goals away this season (3.2 in the last 5) and has 0% clean sheets, while NYC concedes 1.75 goals this season (2.0 in the last 5), highlighting substantial concession risk for both sides. New York City scores 2.25 goals per game this season, FC Cincinnati 1.0, but in the last 5 Cincinnati averages 2.2 goals, so the visitors’ attacking threat is increasing. Both teams create chances — recent xG are 1.76 (NYC) and 1.59 (Cincinnati), and shots on target 5.5 vs 5.75 suggest both sides will have realistic scoring opportunities. Additionally the league BTTS is 57% with an average 3.18 goals per match, therefore I pick BTTS - Yes with a probability of 80% versus 20% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Expected xG is 1.70 for New York City (attack xG 1.66 and xG conceded 1.74) and 1.53 for FC Cincinnati (attack xG 1.55 and xG conceded to hosts 1.50), yielding a combined 3.23 expected goals. Season scoring averages are 2.25 for the home side and 1.00 for the visitors, while FC Cincinnati concedes an average of 3.00 goals per match; both teams have a season rate of matches over 1.5 goals at 75%, reinforcing the over signal. In the last 5 games the home team averages 1.8 goals, the away team 2.2 goals, and the percentage of matches over 2.5 is 60% (NYC) and 80% (Cincinnati), increasing the likelihood of at least 3 goals. Additionally, MLS averages 3.18 goals per match and 64% of fixtures go over 2.5, so with an expected 3.23 goals the strongest and most reliable data-driven play is on Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Both teams frequently draw at the break: New York City records an HT draw in 50% of matches, while FC Cincinnati does so in 75% (approximately 62.5% average HT draws). New York City clearly dominates after the break — they average 1.75 goals in second halves versus 0.5 for Cincinnati, have a second-half goal difference of +4 compared to Cincinnati’s -6, and have earned 9 points in second halves versus the visitors’ 1 point, winning 75% of second halves. The home side is also dangerous late on: they have scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 1 for Cincinnati, which favors turnarounds after the break. xG is similar (1.66 vs 1.55), but NYC has better shot conversion (14% vs 8%) and on the season averages 1.75 points per match versus 0.25 for Cincinnati, therefore the strongest signal is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 1
First half
2 : 3
Second half

Game stats

55Possession (%)45
New York CityFC Cincinnati
17Shots12
New York CityFC Cincinnati
9Shots on target6
New York CityFC Cincinnati
2.12xG1.37
New York CityFC Cincinnati
2Corners4
New York CityFC Cincinnati
58Dangerous attacks26
New York CityFC Cincinnati
7Fouls9
New York CityFC Cincinnati
0Cards3
New York CityFC Cincinnati

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

New York CityFC Cincinnati
1.88Goals scored / game1.63
New York CityFC Cincinnati
1.38Goals allowed / game2.38
New York CityFC Cincinnati
57%Average possession51%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
5.5Shots on target / game5.63
New York CityFC Cincinnati

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.38Shots per game14.38
New York CityFC Cincinnati
5.5Shots on target5.63
New York CityFC Cincinnati
14%Shot conversion11.3%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
57%Possession51%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
1.54xG for1.61
New York CityFC Cincinnati
1.43xG against1.62
New York CityFC Cincinnati

Shooting quality

New York City: Efficient finishingFC Cincinnati: Attacking
New York CityFC Cincinnati
Accuracy (shots on target)41%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FC Cincinnati is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - New York City · 1 pts / game - FC Cincinnati

New York City
WLDLL
Season result split
38% W25% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-3
1.38 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WWLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
FC Cincinnati
LWLDD
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 away
0-1-3
LLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 3.4xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

New York City is 15% better for: goals scored per game.

1.88 goals / game - New York City · 1.63 goals / game - FC Cincinnati

New York City is 72% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.38 goals / game - New York City · 2.38 goals / game - FC Cincinnati

New York City scoring profile: very strong

New York City scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 meczów), while FC Cincinnati keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).

FC Cincinnati scoring profile: very strong

FC Cincinnati scores in 75% of games (6 of 8 meczów), while New York City keeps a clean sheet in 13% (1 of 8 meczów).

15Goals scored (season)13
New York CityFC Cincinnati
11Goals conceded (season)19
New York CityFC Cincinnati
3.25Average goals per game4
New York CityFC Cincinnati
7Goals scored (last 5)11
New York CityFC Cincinnati
9Goals conceded (last 5)17
New York CityFC Cincinnati

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal75%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
50%2 goals50%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
25%3 goals25%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
13%4 goals13%
New York CityFC Cincinnati

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal88%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
38%2 goals50%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
13%3 goals50%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
0%4 goals25%
New York CityFC Cincinnati

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time50%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
13%BTTS in both halves38%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
50%Scored in both halves38%
New York CityFC Cincinnati

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
80%BTTS - last 5100%
New York CityFC Cincinnati

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
25%Min. 3 goals before half-time38%
New York CityFC Cincinnati

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
63%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time50%
New York CityFC Cincinnati

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

New York City is 138% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / game - New York City · 0.63 pts / game - FC Cincinnati

New York City - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing
FC Cincinnati - half-time state
0% leading63% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per game (1st half)0.63
New York CityFC Cincinnati
0.88Goals scored (1st half)0.5
New York CityFC Cincinnati
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1
New York CityFC Cincinnati
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.5
New York CityFC Cincinnati
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
50%No goal before half-time50%
New York CityFC Cincinnati

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per game (2nd half)1.25
New York CityFC Cincinnati
1Goals scored (2nd half)1.13
New York CityFC Cincinnati
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)1.38
New York CityFC Cincinnati
1.88Average goals (2nd half)2.5
New York CityFC Cincinnati
38%Clean sheet after half-time13%
New York CityFC Cincinnati
13%No goal after half-time38%
New York CityFC Cincinnati

New York City - second-half results

38% W25% R38% P
12
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FC Cincinnati - second-half results

38% W13% R50% P
5
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.63
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

New York City - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.61.2
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
FC Cincinnati - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.401.40
Goals scored / game0.81.4
Goals allowed / game1.61.8
Average goals per game2.43.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals80%100%
3 goals60%80%
Clean sheet20%0%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

New York City
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
3
0
16-30
4
2
31-45
4
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

FC Cincinnati
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.63
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
114%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
69%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

New York City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

FC Cincinnati

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.76
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
54% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
54%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

New York CityLigaFC Cincinnati
Average goals per game 3.253.18 4.00
Both teams scored 75%58% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 63%64% 50%
Clean sheets 13%24% 13%
Goal before half-time 75%73% 50%
Goal after half-time 100%81% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.18
Average goals per game
58%
Both teams scored
64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.94
Home goals / game
1.24
Away goals / game
+56%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defensive advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Alvas Elvis PowellOff: Teenage Lingani Hadebe
  2. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Andrei ChirilaOff: Alvas Elvis Powell
  3. FC CincinnatiYellow cardGilberto Ivan Flores Melgarejo
  4. New York CityGoalAgustin OjedaAssist: Aiden Connor O'Neill
  5. FC CincinnatiGoalAhoueke DenkeyAssist: Gerardo Valenzuela
  6. FC CincinnatiYellow cardKyle Smith
  7. FC CincinnatiSubstitutionOn: Ayoub JabbariOff: Tom Barlow
  8. New York CitySubstitutionOn: Strahinja TanasijevićOff: Tayvon Gray
  9. FC CincinnatiGoalAndrei ChirilaAssist: Pavel Bucha
  10. FC CincinnatiGoalEvander da Silva Ferreira
  11. FC CincinnatiYellow cardBrian Anunga

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of New York City vs FC Cincinnati?

The MLS match finished New York City 4:4 FC Cincinnati. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before New York City vs FC Cincinnati?

New York City score 1.88 goals per game on average and FC Cincinnati 1.63. The MLS average is 3.18 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 75% of New York City's matches and 63% of FC Cincinnati's.

What form are New York City and FC Cincinnati in?

Over the last 5 games New York City have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and FC Cincinnati 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New York City vs FC Cincinnati?

The statistical background for New York City vs FC Cincinnati — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.