New Zealand vs Egypt: match statistics
New Zealand vs Egypt: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
New Zealand play Egypt in World Cup (International). The match date is 22 June 2026 at 03:00. Venue: BC Place Stadium. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
New Zealand: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match. Egypt: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
New Zealand scores 1.33 and concedes 3.33 goals per match. Egypt scores 1.60 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: New Zealand 100%, Egypt 100%. Over 2.5: New Zealand 100%, Egypt 40%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Egypt has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.30. New Zealand: 10.3 shots per match, Egypt: 13.4.
Match halves
New Zealand: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Egypt: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 0.80.
Goals by minute
New Zealand: 0-15 (2 goals). Egypt: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
World Cup: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Match description
New Zealand, after the 2:2 with Iran, is no longer a straightforward underdog, having taken the lead twice. Egypt performed very well against Belgium, showed quick transitions and the Salah–Marmoush pairing looked dangerous. Main pick: Egypt, but given New Zealand’s form a draw is stronger than it was before the tournament. Status: SMALL BET
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| New Zealand | Egypt | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 48% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.44 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Egypt is 264% better for: last-5 form.
0.33 pts / match - New Zealand · 1.2 pts / match - Egypt
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Egypt is 20% better for: goals scored per match.
1.33 goals / match - New Zealand · 1.6 goals / match - Egypt
Egypt is 138% better for: goals conceded per match.
3.33 goals / match - New Zealand · 1.4 goals / match - Egypt
New Zealand scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Egypt keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).
Egypt scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while New Zealand keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — New Zealand
Over / Under — Egypt
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Egypt is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - New Zealand · 2 pts / match - Egypt
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
New Zealand - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 2.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Egypt - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.33 | 0.33 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.7 | 2.7 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 3.3 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 67% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 0% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
New Zealand
Egypt
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (World Cup).
Teams vs league
| New Zealand | Liga | Egypt | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.67 | 2.96 | • 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 55% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 56% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 26% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 69% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 82% | ▼ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of New Zealand vs Egypt?
The World Cup match finished New Zealand 1:3 Egypt. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before New Zealand vs Egypt?
New Zealand score 1.33 goals per game on average and Egypt 1.60. The World Cup average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 100% of New Zealand's matches and 100% of Egypt's.
What form are New Zealand and Egypt in?
Over the last 5 games New Zealand have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Egypt 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New Zealand vs Egypt?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.