New Zealand vs Egypt: match statistics
New Zealand vs Egypt: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
New Zealand played against Egypt in World Cup (International). The game was played on June 22, 2026. Venue: BC Place Stadium. Final score: 1:3.
Recent form
New Zealand has 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Egypt has 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
New Zealand scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 2.00. Egypt scores 1.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 3.00 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 100% of New Zealand's games and 100% of Egypt's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 0%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
New Zealand has the higher season xG average, 1.77 to 1.33 per game. New Zealand takes 14.0 shots per game, while Egypt takes 14.0.
First-half and second-half trends
New Zealand leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Egypt leads at halftime in 100% and scores 0.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
New Zealand's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Egypt, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
World Cup games average 3.00 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
New Zealand, after the 2:2 with Iran, is no longer a straightforward underdog, having taken the lead twice. Egypt performed very well against Belgium, showed quick transitions and the Salah–Marmoush pairing looked dangerous. Main pick: Egypt, but given New Zealand’s form a draw is stronger than it was before the tournament. Status: SMALL BET
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Pick: BTTS - Yes. New Zealand scored twice against Iran and demonstrated a clear route to goal via Chris Wood and direct service into dangerous areas. Egypt scored against Belgium and also generated late chances through Salah, Marmoush and quick attacks between the lines. Group G has already produced goals from every team, and this matchup features sufficient attacking triggers on both sides to keep BTTS - Yes above the market line. Status: BET
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Pick: Over 2.5. The model gives 52% for Over 2.5 and 48% for Under 2.5, with xG New Zealand 1.20 and Egypt 1.55 (total 2.75). New Zealand scored two goals against Iran and showed it is no longer a passive underdog. Egypt were dangerous against Belgium, especially on quick transitions via Salah and Marmoush. Both teams, after the first match, have real reasons to play for the win, so the goal profile is high. The 2.5 line is playable mainly because after the opening round we see greater defensive susceptibility and an increased need to react after conceding a goal. Status: NOBET
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Pick: X/2 (draw at half-time and Egypt win after 90 minutes). The model assigns this scenario 23%, with a 1X2 distribution: New Zealand 27%, draw 30%, Egypt 43%. xG is 1.20 for New Zealand, 1.55 for Egypt and 2.75 overall, and BTTS profile is YES 63% / NO 37%. New Zealand scored two goals against Iran and is no longer a passive underdog. Egypt looked dangerous versus Belgium, especially on quick transitions and due to quality in attack. Egypt has the higher ceiling, but because New Zealand gained confidence from the first match, X/2 fits better than 2/2. The largest HT/FT scenarios in the model are: X/2 23%, X/1 16%, 2/2 16%. The main risks are a quick turnaround by the favorite or an underdog counter goal, but baseline expectation is that the quality gap will be more decisive after the break. Status: SMALL BET
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| New Zealand | Egypt | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 57% | 21% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
New Zealand is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
2 goals / game - New Zealand · 1 goals / game - Egypt
Egypt is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.
2 goals / game - New Zealand · 1 goals / game - Egypt
New Zealand scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Egypt keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).
Egypt scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while New Zealand keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - New Zealand
Over / Under - Egypt
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Egypt is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - New Zealand · 3 pts / game - Egypt
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
New Zealand - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Egypt - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 3.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 0% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
New Zealand
Egypt
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (World Cup).
Teams vs league
| New Zealand | Liga | Egypt | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 3.00 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 56% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 51% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 26% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of New Zealand vs Egypt?
The World Cup match finished New Zealand 1:3 Egypt. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before New Zealand vs Egypt?
New Zealand score 2.00 goals per game on average and Egypt 1.00. The World Cup average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 100% of New Zealand's matches and 100% of Egypt's.
What form are New Zealand and Egypt in?
Over the last 5 games New Zealand have a 0-1-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Egypt 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for New Zealand vs Egypt?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.