Iran - Azadegan LeagueShahid Dastgerdi StadiumData current as of September 01, 2026

Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft: match statistics

Niroye Zamini crest
Niroye Zamini
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Sanat Naft crest
Sanat Naft

Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Niroye Zamini played against Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on July 16, 2026. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Niroye Zamini has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Sanat Naft has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Niroye Zamini scores 0.78 goals per game and allows 0.91. Sanat Naft scores 1.06 and allows 0.64. Games in this league average 1.58 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 28% of Niroye Zamini's games and 39% of Sanat Naft's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 27%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Sanat Naft has the higher season xG average, 1.09 to 1.01 per game. Niroye Zamini takes 3.2 shots per game, while Sanat Naft takes 3.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Niroye Zamini leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.34 goals per game after halftime. Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.76 after halftime.

When the teams score

Niroye Zamini's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Sanat Naft, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Azadegan League games average 1.58 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorites are the visitors — Sanat Naft: they sit 4th in the table versus 13th-place Niroye Zamini, with 15 wins this season compared to the home side’s 7 wins and a superior goal difference 35–21 versus 25–29. The gap in recent form is clear: Sanat Naft in their last five matches has 3 wins and 2 draws, scoring 8 and conceding 3 (points average 2.2), while Niroye Zamini has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with a 4:7 record and a points average of 0.8. At home the hosts attempt more shots (8.67 per match) and have a higher conversion rate (14%), translating to 0.88 goals per home match and xG For 1.21; however Sanat Naft have a similar number of shots on target (4.33 vs 4.11) and lower average goals conceded away (0.69 goals conceded on the road with xG Against 1.09). Both teams have a high share of matches without scoring (56% home/away) and a low total goals per match (Niroye 1.63 at home vs Sanat Naft 1.5 away), which points to a low-scoring game. Considering the table advantage, superior goal difference and form (points average 2.2 vs 0.8), I tip the visitors to win (2) — hosts 20%, draw 20%, visitors 60%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict no BTTS (No) as the more likely outcome. Seasonal BTTS rates are 47% for Niroye and 31% for Sanat Naft (average ~39%), indicating both teams do not regularly both score. Additionally, both teams have high clean sheet rates: 47% for the home side and 44% for the away side, while the league clean sheet level is as high as 92%, with seasonal average goals conceded only 0.59 and 0.69 respectively, which favors matches with one or no goals scored. Although Sanat have 60% BTTS in their last 5 matches and average 1.6 goals scored, the short-term away signal does not outweigh the strong seasonal trends, therefore I assign 70% to 'No'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG and defensive analysis: the home side averages xG 1.08 and concedes 0.68 xG, the visitors average 1.12 xG and concede 1.09 xG; from this I derive expected goals of 1.09 for Niroye Zamini and 0.90 for Sanat Naft, totaling 1.99 expected goals. A Poisson model for a sum of 1.99 yields probability of Over 1.5 goals ≈59%, Over 2.5 ≈32% and Over 3.5 ≈14%, meaning results under 2.5 are more likely (~68%) and especially under 3.5 (~86%). Seasonal indicators confirm low goal potential: only 29% of home matches and 25% of away matches finished Over 2.5, while Under 3.5 occurred in 88% of Niroye Zamini’s matches and 94% of Sanat Naft’s. Additionally, Sanat Naft registers more shots on target (4.33 vs 2.4), but the low total xG and moderate finishing rates (conversion 13% for the home team, 9% for the visitors) do not suggest frequent high-scoring games. Based on this I recommend backing the Under market and select the 3.5 line as the strongest signal (model ~86% and seasonal 88–94%), while Under 2.5 (≈68%) is also a sensible, more conventional alternative.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: the home team were level at the break in 82% of their matches this season and the away team in 69%, which clearly favors an X result after 45 minutes. At the same time the home side win 59% of matches versus 31% for the visitors and have a strong second half — they average 0.88 goals after the break, win 53% of second halves and score at least one goal after half-time in 71% of matches. The hosts average 1.29 goals per game compared to 0.81 for the guests, have an xG of 1.08 versus the visitors’ 1.12, but concede only 0.68 xG, suggesting greater ability to maintain a lead after scoring. For these reasons the most likely HT/FT scenario is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win), although due to the away side’s form in their last five matches (60% away wins vs 20% for the hosts) an X/X outcome also represents a significant risk.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
-1Shots-1
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
-1Shots on target-1
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0xG0
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
-1Corners-1
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0Dangerous attacks0
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
-1Fouls-1
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
-1Cards-1
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0.78Goals scored / game1.06
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0.91Goals allowed / game0.64
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
26%Average possession25%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
1.22Shots on target / game1
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

3.19Shots per game3.82
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
1.22Shots on target1
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
24.5%Shot conversion27.8%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
26%Possession25%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
1.01xG for1.09
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
1.36xG against0.84
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

Shooting quality

Niroye Zamini: Counter-attackingSanat Naft: Counter-attacking
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
Accuracy (shots on target)38%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.320.29
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.641.06

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Sanat Naft is 175% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Niroye Zamini · 2.2 pts / game - Sanat Naft

Niroye Zamini
WLLLD
Season result split
22% W38% R41% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-12-13
1.03 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-6-5
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
WDDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Sanat Naft
WDDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
45% W36% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-12-6
1.73 pts / game · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-6-5
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DLWDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.01Opponent xG: 0.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sanat Naft is 36% better for: goals scored per game.

0.78 goals / game - Niroye Zamini · 1.06 goals / game - Sanat Naft

Sanat Naft is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.91 goals / game - Niroye Zamini · 0.64 goals / game - Sanat Naft

Niroye Zamini scoring profile: mixed

Niroye Zamini scores in 47% of games (15 of 32 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 45% (15 of 33 meczów).

Sanat Naft scoring profile: strong

Sanat Naft scores in 64% of games (21 of 33 meczów), while Niroye Zamini keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 meczów).

25Goals scored (season)35
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
29Goals conceded (season)21
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
1.69Average goals per game1.7
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

How often they score at least...

47%1 goal64%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
16%2 goals27%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
9%3 goals9%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
3%4 goals6%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal55%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
19%2 goals9%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
6%3 goals0%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
3%4 goals0%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

30%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time18%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
9%Scored in both halves15%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

BTTS and goal count

13%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
20%BTTS - last 560%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time39%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

2nd half

53%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Niroye Zamini is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / game - Niroye Zamini · 1.03 pts / game - Sanat Naft

Niroye Zamini - half-time state
16% leading63% draw22% trailing
Sanat Naft - half-time state
9% leading76% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per game (1st half)1.03
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0.31Goals scored (1st half)0.3
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0.31Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0.63Average goals (1st half)0.67
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
72%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
75%No goal before half-time76%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

After half-time (2nd half)

1.03Points per game (2nd half)1.82
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0.34Goals scored (2nd half)0.76
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0.47Goals conceded (2nd half)0.27
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
0.81Average goals (2nd half)1.03
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
59%Clean sheet after half-time73%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft
75%No goal after half-time45%
Niroye ZaminiSanat Naft

Niroye Zamini - second-half results

16% W56% R28% P
35
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding138%

Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sanat Naft - second-half results

45% W45% R9% P
34
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
60
Second-half points
+16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding500%

Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Niroye Zamini - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.60.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Sanat Naft - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.20
Goals scored / game0.80.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game1.21.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Niroye Zamini
ScoredConceded
7
5
0-15
1
2
16-30
6
7
31-45
0
4
46-60
2
4
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
3
3
16-30
6
7
31-45
9
3
46-60
7
6
61-75
9
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.70
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.7 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Niroye Zamini

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
87%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 28% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
154%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.47
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Niroye ZaminiLigaSanat Naft
Average goals per game 1.691.58 1.70
Both teams scored 28%30% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%22% 27%
Clean sheets 38%46% 45%
Goal before half-time 44%46% 39%
Goal after half-time 53%57% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.58
Average goals per game
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / game
0.69
Away goals / game
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Sanat NaftGoalMeysam Teymouri

Head-to-head

Record from Niroye Zamini's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Sanat Naft. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft?

The Azadegan League match finished Niroye Zamini 0:2 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft?

Niroye Zamini score 0.78 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 1.06. The Azadegan League average is 1.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Niroye Zamini's matches and 39% of Sanat Naft's.

What form are Niroye Zamini and Sanat Naft in?

Over the last 5 games Niroye Zamini have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sanat Naft 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.