Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft: match statistics
Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Niroye Zamini played against Sanat Naft in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on July 16, 2026. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Niroye Zamini has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Sanat Naft has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Niroye Zamini scores 0.78 goals per game and allows 0.91. Sanat Naft scores 1.06 and allows 0.64. Games in this league average 1.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 28% of Niroye Zamini's games and 39% of Sanat Naft's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 27%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 22% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sanat Naft has the higher season xG average, 1.09 to 1.01 per game. Niroye Zamini takes 3.2 shots per game, while Sanat Naft takes 3.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Niroye Zamini leads at halftime in 16% of its games and scores 0.34 goals per game after halftime. Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 9% and scores 0.76 after halftime.
When the teams score
Niroye Zamini's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Sanat Naft, it is minutes 46-60 (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.58 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 22% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorites are the visitors — Sanat Naft: they sit 4th in the table versus 13th-place Niroye Zamini, with 15 wins this season compared to the home side’s 7 wins and a superior goal difference 35–21 versus 25–29. The gap in recent form is clear: Sanat Naft in their last five matches has 3 wins and 2 draws, scoring 8 and conceding 3 (points average 2.2), while Niroye Zamini has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses with a 4:7 record and a points average of 0.8. At home the hosts attempt more shots (8.67 per match) and have a higher conversion rate (14%), translating to 0.88 goals per home match and xG For 1.21; however Sanat Naft have a similar number of shots on target (4.33 vs 4.11) and lower average goals conceded away (0.69 goals conceded on the road with xG Against 1.09). Both teams have a high share of matches without scoring (56% home/away) and a low total goals per match (Niroye 1.63 at home vs Sanat Naft 1.5 away), which points to a low-scoring game. Considering the table advantage, superior goal difference and form (points average 2.2 vs 0.8), I tip the visitors to win (2) — hosts 20%, draw 20%, visitors 60%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict no BTTS (No) as the more likely outcome. Seasonal BTTS rates are 47% for Niroye and 31% for Sanat Naft (average ~39%), indicating both teams do not regularly both score. Additionally, both teams have high clean sheet rates: 47% for the home side and 44% for the away side, while the league clean sheet level is as high as 92%, with seasonal average goals conceded only 0.59 and 0.69 respectively, which favors matches with one or no goals scored. Although Sanat have 60% BTTS in their last 5 matches and average 1.6 goals scored, the short-term away signal does not outweigh the strong seasonal trends, therefore I assign 70% to 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive analysis: the home side averages xG 1.08 and concedes 0.68 xG, the visitors average 1.12 xG and concede 1.09 xG; from this I derive expected goals of 1.09 for Niroye Zamini and 0.90 for Sanat Naft, totaling 1.99 expected goals. A Poisson model for a sum of 1.99 yields probability of Over 1.5 goals ≈59%, Over 2.5 ≈32% and Over 3.5 ≈14%, meaning results under 2.5 are more likely (~68%) and especially under 3.5 (~86%). Seasonal indicators confirm low goal potential: only 29% of home matches and 25% of away matches finished Over 2.5, while Under 3.5 occurred in 88% of Niroye Zamini’s matches and 94% of Sanat Naft’s. Additionally, Sanat Naft registers more shots on target (4.33 vs 2.4), but the low total xG and moderate finishing rates (conversion 13% for the home team, 9% for the visitors) do not suggest frequent high-scoring games. Based on this I recommend backing the Under market and select the 3.5 line as the strongest signal (model ~86% and seasonal 88–94%), while Under 2.5 (≈68%) is also a sensible, more conventional alternative.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome: the home team were level at the break in 82% of their matches this season and the away team in 69%, which clearly favors an X result after 45 minutes. At the same time the home side win 59% of matches versus 31% for the visitors and have a strong second half — they average 0.88 goals after the break, win 53% of second halves and score at least one goal after half-time in 71% of matches. The hosts average 1.29 goals per game compared to 0.81 for the guests, have an xG of 1.08 versus the visitors’ 1.12, but concede only 0.68 xG, suggesting greater ability to maintain a lead after scoring. For these reasons the most likely HT/FT scenario is X/1 (draw at half-time, home win), although due to the away side’s form in their last five matches (60% away wins vs 20% for the hosts) an X/X outcome also represents a significant risk.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Niroye Zamini | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.32 | 0.29 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.64 | 1.06 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sanat Naft is 175% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Niroye Zamini · 2.2 pts / game - Sanat Naft
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 36% better for: goals scored per game.
0.78 goals / game - Niroye Zamini · 1.06 goals / game - Sanat Naft
Sanat Naft is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.91 goals / game - Niroye Zamini · 0.64 goals / game - Sanat Naft
Niroye Zamini scores in 47% of games (15 of 32 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 45% (15 of 33 meczów).
Sanat Naft scores in 64% of games (21 of 33 meczów), while Niroye Zamini keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Niroye Zamini
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Niroye Zamini is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.09 pts / game - Niroye Zamini · 1.03 pts / game - Sanat Naft
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Niroye Zamini - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 16% of games and wins 22%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 9% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Niroye Zamini
Sanat Naft
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Niroye Zamini | Liga | Sanat Naft | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 1.69 | 1.58 | ▲ 1.70 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 30% | ▲ 39% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 25% | 22% | ▲ 27% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 38% | 46% | • 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 46% | ▼ 39% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 53% | 57% | ▲ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Niroye Zamini's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Sanat Naft. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft?
The Azadegan League match finished Niroye Zamini 0:2 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft?
Niroye Zamini score 0.78 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 1.06. The Azadegan League average is 1.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Niroye Zamini's matches and 39% of Sanat Naft's.
What form are Niroye Zamini and Sanat Naft in?
Over the last 5 games Niroye Zamini have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Sanat Naft 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Niroye Zamini vs Sanat Naft?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


