Nõmme Kalju vs Tammeka: match statistics
Nõmme Kalju vs Tammeka: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Nõmme Kalju played Tammeka in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The match was played on 2 August 2026. Venue: Hiiu staadion. Final score: 5:1.
Current form
Nõmme Kalju: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Tammeka: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Nõmme Kalju scores 1.65 and concedes 0.80 goals per match. Tammeka scores 1.17 and concedes 1.44. League average: 3.11 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Nõmme Kalju 50%, Tammeka 50%. Over 2.5: Nõmme Kalju 40%, Tammeka 56%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Nõmme Kalju has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.60. Nõmme Kalju: 15.0 shots per match, Tammeka: 13.9.
Match halves
Nõmme Kalju: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.90. Tammeka: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
Nõmme Kalju: 61-75 (9 goals). Tammeka: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Meistriliiga: 3.11 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 4-1-1. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1). Nõmme Kalju have 33 goals this season versus Tammeka’s 21, and at home they average 1.9 goals per match while Tammeka averages only 1.13 on the road. Defensively the hosts concede 1.00 goal at home on average, while the visitors concede 1.88 away; the home record of +9 versus the guests’ -6 further emphasizes Kalju’s advantage. Chance quality is similar (average xG: hosts 1.83 at home vs visitors 1.92 away), but Kalju convert those chances more efficiently — shot conversion 12% versus 6% and only 10% of matches without scoring compared to 38% for Tammeka. Although Tammeka arrive in better form (last 5: 4 wins, averaging 2.4 points), the season-long advantages in attacking efficiency and the hosts’ more stable defense lead me to favor a Nõmme Kalju victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a season BTTS rate of 50% (Nõmme Kalju 50% vs Tammeka 50%), and in the last 5 matches both sides record BTTS at 60%, while the league percentage of matches with goals from both teams is 57%. Tammeka shows clear offensive form in the last 5 fixtures: scoring 25 goals (avg 5.0 per match) and averaging 17.38 shots with 5.88 on target and xG 1.92, whereas Nõmme Kalju records 11.1 shots, 3.9 on target and xG 1.35. Defenses of both teams also leave room for goals: Nõmme Kalju conceded an average of 1.6 goals in the last 5 matches and 1.1 goals per game seasonally, while Tammeka concedes 1.88 goals per game on the season. Additionally, clean sheet percentages are low (30% hosts vs 25% guests), and seasonally hosts scored 33 goals versus Tammeka’s 21, indicating both sides regularly find the net. Considering 60% BTTS in the last 5 matches for both teams, Tammeka’s higher xG and shot volume (1.92 vs 1.35) and low clean sheet rates, the BTTS - Yes scenario appears more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: Nõmme Kalju has an attacking xG of 1.35 while Tammeka concedes 1.52 xG on average, yielding ~1.44 expected goals for the home side. Tammeka’s attacking xG is 1.92 while Nõmme Kalju concedes 1.66 xG on average, yielding ~1.79 expected goals for the visitors; total expected goals ≈ 3.23. The visitors are in clear scoring form — 25 goals in their last 5 matches (5.0 per game); their recent xG is 2.31 with an average of 17.38 shots and 5.88 on target, increasing the likelihood of a higher goal count. Seasonal indicators support a goal-heavy scenario: matches over 2.5 goals are 50% for the home team and 63% for the visitors, while the league average goals is 3.11 (our projection 3.23). Both teams rarely keep clean sheets (30% and 25%) and in 50% of matches each side has both scored and conceded, therefore I recommend Over 2.5 as the strongest signal (estimated probability of Over 2.5 ~63%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a home win (X/1), which I assign a 30% probability. There is a strong first-half draw signal: Nõmme Kalju were level at the break in 60% of their matches and Tammeka in 50%, yielding an expected HT draw frequency of around 55%. After the interval the hosts have the edge – Kalju average 0.9 goals in the second half versus Tammeka’s 0.38 and gain an average of 1.7 points after the break compared to 1.38 for the visitors, which favors a turnaround. Additionally, Kalju win 50% of home matches and have higher shot conversion (11% vs 6%), while Tammeka generates higher xG (1.92 vs 1.35) but concedes on average 1.88 goals per game, which indicates risk for the away side. For these reasons I rate X/1 highest (30%), with the main alternatives being draw/draw (X/X 14%) and away lead maintained to full-time (2/2 14%) because Tammeka score more frequently in the first half (0.75 goals on average vs 0.3 for the hosts).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Nõmme Kalju | Tammeka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tammeka is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Nõmme Kalju · 2 pts / match - Tammeka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nõmme Kalju is 41% better for: goals scored per match.
1.65 goals / match - Nõmme Kalju · 1.17 goals / match - Tammeka
Nõmme Kalju is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.8 goals / match - Nõmme Kalju · 1.44 goals / match - Tammeka
Nõmme Kalju scores in 85% of matches (17 of 20 matches), while Tammeka keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).
Tammeka scores in 67% of matches (12 of 18 matches), while Nõmme Kalju keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Nõmme Kalju
Over / Under — Tammeka
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Nõmme Kalju is 97% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.75 pts / match - Nõmme Kalju · 0.89 pts / match - Tammeka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nõmme Kalju - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tammeka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Nõmme Kalju
Tammeka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).
Teams vs league
| Nõmme Kalju | Liga | Tammeka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.45 | 3.11 | ▼ 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 59% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 67% | ▼ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 40% | 23% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 75% | ▼ 61% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 80% | 88% | ▼ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Nõmme Kalju 4 - 1 - 1 Tammeka. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Nõmme Kalju vs Tammeka?
The Meistriliiga match finished Nõmme Kalju 5:1 Tammeka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Nõmme Kalju and Tammeka?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Nõmme Kalju won 4, Tammeka won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Nõmme Kalju vs Tammeka?
Nõmme Kalju score 1.65 goals per game on average and Tammeka 1.17. The Meistriliiga average is 3.11 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Nõmme Kalju's matches and 50% of Tammeka's.
What form are Nõmme Kalju and Tammeka in?
Over the last 5 games Nõmme Kalju have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Tammeka 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nõmme Kalju vs Tammeka?
The statistical background for Nõmme Kalju vs Tammeka — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


