Estonia - MeistriliigaData current as of September 06, 2026

Nõmme United vs Paide: match statistics

Nõmme United crest
Nõmme United
2 : 3half-time 0:2
Paide crest
Paide

Nõmme United vs Paide: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nõmme United played against Paide in Meistriliiga (Estonia). The game was played on May 10, 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Recent form

Nõmme United has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Paide has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Nõmme United scores 2.30 goals per game and allows 2.40. Paide scores 1.70 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 3.19 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 90% of Nõmme United's games and 60% of Paide's. The Over 2.5 rates are 90% and 60%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Paide has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.46 per game. Nõmme United takes 10.9 shots per game, while Paide takes 12.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Nõmme United leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 1.30 goals per game after halftime. Paide leads at halftime in 30% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nõmme United's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (5 goals). For Paide, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Meistriliiga games average 3.19 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Nõmme United are favorites at home: they have a 60% home win rate and average 3.4 goals per home match, with 14.2 shots and 6.0 on target per game. Paide away average 2.2 goals with 12.8 shots and 5.8 on target and a 17% conversion rate, so the hosts have the edge in volume and efficiency of attempts (24% vs 17%). Defensively Nõmme is unstable — in their last 5 home matches they conceded 13 goals (2.6 per game), while Paide conceded 5 goals in their last 5 matches (1.0 per game) and have 20% clean sheets on the road. Home xG is 1.8 versus Paide’s 1.62 xG away, and neither team had matches without scoring (0% such games), with Nõmme’s average total goals at home of 5.0, which indicates high potential for goals from both sides. Considering the 60% home win rate, higher shooting efficiency for the hosts and concurrent defensive issues (13 conceded in last 5), I predict a home win with 58% probability, draw 20% and away win 22%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The 'both teams to score' scenario is more likely because Paide has a seasonal BTTS of 80% with an average goals per game of 2.2 and xG of 1.62, plus an average of 5.8 shots on target and a 17% conversion rate, indicating a genuine scoring capability. Nõmme United has recorded BTTS in 100% of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.4 goals scored and 2.6 conceded per game (12 scored and 13 conceded in their last 5), which strongly increases the likelihood of both teams finding the net. Although the home side’s seasonal BTTS is only 40% and they have 40% clean sheets, their recent defensive form is weak (last 5: xG against 1.88 and 13 conceded), which negates arguments against BTTS. Additionally, the league average goals per game is 3.25 and the visitors’ matches exceed 2.5 goals in 80% of cases, supporting a high-scoring scenario. Based on this, I assess BTTS probability at 75% vs 25% and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis: Home attack xG is 1.44 versus 1.62 for the visitors, and xG conceded is 1.55 (Nõmme) vs 1.45 (Paide), which averaged yields an expected 1.45 goals for Nõmme and 1.58 for Paide (total 3.03). With this combined mean of 3.03 I estimate probabilities at roughly 80% for Over 1.5, 58% for Over 2.5 and 36% for Over 3.5; these figures are close to the league goals average of 3.25 and the league Over 2.5 rate of 67%. Additionally, Paide away have 80% of matches Over 2.5 and 80% BTTS, recording 5.8 shots on target with a 17% conversion, while Nõmme has 3.2 such shots and an 11% conversion — this strengthens the signal for away goals and a high-scoring game overall. Nõmme in the last 5 matches averaged 2.4 goals scored and 2.6 conceded, which confirms an elevated goals tempo in the home side’s form; therefore the best pick is Over 2.5 (side: Over) as the most balanced and value option (58% probability).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

First-half statistics favor the home side — Nõmme United led at the break in 40% of home matches and were level at half-time in 60%, with an average of 0.4 goals scored by half-time and 0.0 conceded (seasonCSPercentageHT_home=100%), so the likelihood of Paide leading at the break is very low. However, Paide have a clear attacking edge: they score on average 2.2 goals per game (seasonScoredAVG_away=2.2), record an xG of 1.62 versus the hosts’ 1.44, and register 5.8 shots on target with a 17% conversion rate (versus 3.2 and 11% for Nõmme), which increases their second-half potential. Second-half data support the visitors’ ability to overturn a deficit — their average goals after the break is 2.4 compared to 1.6 for the home side (AVG_2hg_away=2.4, AVG_2hg_home=1.6), and 80% of Paide’s matches feature more than 1.5 goals in the second half (over15_2hg_percentage_away=80%). Considering that Nõmme rarely concedes before half-time (concededAVGHT_home=0.0) but Paide dominate offensively in the second half, the most probable scenario is a draw at half-time and a Paide victory at full-time, hence the pick X/2 (approx. 27%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 2
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Nõmme UnitedPaide
13Shots21
Nõmme UnitedPaide
5Shots on target6
Nõmme UnitedPaide
1.81xG2.29
Nõmme UnitedPaide
8Corners3
Nõmme UnitedPaide
87Dangerous attacks75
Nõmme UnitedPaide
12Fouls15
Nõmme UnitedPaide
1Cards3
Nõmme UnitedPaide

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2.3Goals scored / game1.7
Nõmme UnitedPaide
2.4Goals allowed / game1.2
Nõmme UnitedPaide
49%Average possession53%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
4.6Shots on target / game4.5
Nõmme UnitedPaide

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.9Shots per game12.1
Nõmme UnitedPaide
4.6Shots on target4.5
Nõmme UnitedPaide
21.1%Shot conversion14%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
49%Possession53%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
1.46xG for1.53
Nõmme UnitedPaide
1.86xG against1.5
Nõmme UnitedPaide

Shooting quality

Nõmme United: Efficient finishingPaide: Efficient finishing
Nõmme UnitedPaide
Accuracy (shots on target)42%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.38

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nõmme United is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Nõmme United · 1.4 pts / game - Paide

Nõmme United
WLLWW
Season result split
40% W10% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-5
1.30 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Paide
WWDLL
Season result split
50% W20% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-3
1.70 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nõmme United is 35% better for: goals scored per game.

2.3 goals / game - Nõmme United · 1.7 goals / game - Paide

Paide is 100% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.4 goals / game - Nõmme United · 1.2 goals / game - Paide

Nõmme United scoring profile: very strong

Nõmme United scores in 90% of games (9 of 10 meczów), while Paide keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 meczów).

Paide scoring profile: very strong

Paide scores in 90% of games (9 of 10 meczów), while Nõmme United keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 10 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)17
Nõmme UnitedPaide
24Goals conceded (season)12
Nõmme UnitedPaide
4.7Average goals per game2.9
Nõmme UnitedPaide
12Goals scored (last 5)8
Nõmme UnitedPaide
13Goals conceded (last 5)6
Nõmme UnitedPaide

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal90%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
50%2 goals50%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
30%3 goals20%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
20%4 goals10%
Nõmme UnitedPaide

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal70%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
60%2 goals40%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
40%3 goals10%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
10%4 goals0%
Nõmme UnitedPaide

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

60%BTTS at half-time20%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
10%BTTS in both halves20%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
40%Scored in both halves40%
Nõmme UnitedPaide

BTTS and goal count

80%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
100%BTTS - last 560%
Nõmme UnitedPaide

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
70%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Nõmme UnitedPaide

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
70%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Nõmme UnitedPaide

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paide is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.3 pts / game - Nõmme United · 1.6 pts / game - Paide

Nõmme United - half-time state
30% leading40% draw30% trailing
Paide - half-time state
30% leading70% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.3Points per game (1st half)1.6
Nõmme UnitedPaide
1Goals scored (1st half)0.7
Nõmme UnitedPaide
1.1Goals conceded (1st half)0.2
Nõmme UnitedPaide
2.1Average goals (1st half)0.9
Nõmme UnitedPaide
20%Clean sheet before half-time80%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
30%No goal before half-time50%
Nõmme UnitedPaide

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per game (2nd half)1.5
Nõmme UnitedPaide
1.3Goals scored (2nd half)1
Nõmme UnitedPaide
1.3Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Nõmme UnitedPaide
2.6Average goals (2nd half)2
Nõmme UnitedPaide
20%Clean sheet after half-time30%
Nõmme UnitedPaide
40%No goal after half-time20%
Nõmme UnitedPaide

Nõmme United - second-half results

30% W20% R50% P
13
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.30
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Paide - second-half results

40% W30% R30% P
16
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding167%

Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nõmme United - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.40
Goals scored / game1.21.2
Goals allowed / game1.01.6
Average goals per game2.22.8
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 6
Paide - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.801.00
Goals scored / game1.00.6
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game1.21.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+4-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nõmme United
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
2
6
16-30
5
2
31-45
4
4
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Paide
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
0
31-45
4
0
46-60
2
4
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.80
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
119%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
81%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nõmme United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.84
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
209%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Paide

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Meistriliiga).

Teams vs league

Nõmme UnitedLigaPaide
Average goals per game 4.703.19 2.90
Both teams scored 90%52% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 90%65% 60%
Clean sheets 0%25% 30%
Goal before half-time 90%72% 50%
Goal after half-time 100%93% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.19
Average goals per game
52%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
2.04
Home goals / game
1.15
Away goals / game
+77%
Home attack advantage
+44%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
93%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PaideGoalDaniel LutsAssist: Martin Miller
  2. PaideYellow cardMartin Miller
  3. Nõmme UnitedYellow cardGert Kabal
  4. Nõmme UnitedSubstitutionOn: Benjamine ChisalaOff: Gert Kabal
  5. Nõmme UnitedGoalBenjamine ChisalaAssist: Bruno Vain
  6. PaideSubstitutionOn: Pa Abdou ChamOff: Daniel Cabral de Oliveira
  7. Nõmme UnitedGoalAndre Frolov
  8. PaideSubstitutionOn: Gerdo JuhkamOff: Romet Nigula
  9. Nõmme UnitedSubstitutionOn: Aleksandr AltebergOff: Karl Läänelaid
  10. PaideYellow cardRamon Smirnov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Nõmme United's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Paide. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Nõmme United vs Paide?

The Meistriliiga match finished Nõmme United 2:3 Paide. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nõmme United vs Paide?

Nõmme United score 2.30 goals per game on average and Paide 1.70. The Meistriliiga average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 90% of Nõmme United's matches and 60% of Paide's.

What form are Nõmme United and Paide in?

Over the last 5 games Nõmme United have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Paide 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nõmme United vs Paide?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Nõmme United vs Paide: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.