Denmark - SuperligaData current as of September 11, 2026

Nordsjælland vs AGF: match statistics

Nordsjælland crest
Nordsjælland
1 : 1half-time 0:1
AGF crest
AGF

Nordsjælland vs AGF: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nordsjælland played against AGF in Superliga (Denmark). The game was played on April 23, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Nordsjælland has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. AGF has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Nordsjælland scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.56. AGF scores 1.89 and allows 1.04. Games in this league average 3.09 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 52% of Nordsjælland's games and 74% of AGF's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 56%, compared with league averages of 61% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

AGF has the higher season xG average, 1.88 to 1.58 per game. Nordsjælland takes 13.0 shots per game, while AGF takes 16.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Nordsjælland leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. AGF leads at halftime in 63% and scores 0.96 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nordsjælland's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). For AGF, it is minutes 61-75 (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Superliga games average 3.09 goals. Both teams score in 61% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a Nordsjælland win. The hosts are in markedly better form: 4 wins in their last 5 matches and 8 goals scored, while AGF have 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss with 5 goals in their last five. Home metrics favor Nordsjælland — they average 60% possession, 6.36 shots on target and xG 1.81 per home game, whereas AGF as visitors record 48% possession, 4.93 shots on target and xG 1.54. Defensively the hosts concede 1.14 goals per home match and keep clean sheets in 43% of home fixtures, while AGF concede 1.21 on the road and have only a 7% clean sheet rate away. Although AGF lead the table with 51 goals versus Nordsjælland’s 45, have a higher shot conversion (15% vs 14%) and 0% share of away matches without scoring, their last 5 matches yield only 1.2 points per game, which reduces their prospects. Considering superior possession, more shots on target and a clearly better home clean sheet record, I assess the hosts have the highest probability of victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Main signal favors BTTS - Yes: AGF has a season BTTS rate of 93% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Nordsjælland is 54% seasonally and 60% in the last 5; league average BTTS is 61%. Offensively both teams look dangerous: AGF scores 2.00 goals per game on average, Nordsjælland at home 1.77, with concurrent goals conceded averages of 1.21 (AGF away) and 0.85 (Nordsjælland home), indicating regular ability to both score and concede. xG data confirm this picture: Nordsjælland generates 2.24 xG at home versus 1.54 xG for AGF away, while xG against is 1.06 (home) vs 1.46 (away), so chances are created at both ends. Additionally Nordsjælland averages 6.69 shots on target and 19.0 shots per game versus 4.93 on target and 13.57 for AGF, with conversion rates 9% vs 15%, and the hosts have 46% clean sheets at home while AGF has only 7% clean sheets away, increasing the likelihood of the visitors scoring. Considering the strong signal from AGF (93% BTTS), xG 2.24 vs 1.54 and average goals 1.77 vs 2.00, I rate BTTS at 78% for "yes" and 22% for "no", therefore I pick "yes".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model calculates expected xG for Nordsjælland at 1.85 (xG_for 2.24 vs xG_against AGF 1.46) and for AGF at 1.30 (xG_for 1.54 vs xG_against Nordsjælland 1.06), totaling 3.15 expected goals. A Poisson with lambda 3.15 implies roughly an 82% chance of Over 1.5 goals, about 61% for Over 2.5 and around 39% for Over 3.5, which aligns with the league average of 3.10 goals per match. Additionally, AGF has 93% of matches with both teams scoring and 100% of away games Over 1.5 goals, while Nordsjælland has 62% of home games Over 1.5, reinforcing the case for Over 1.5. Nordsjælland averages 19 shots and 6.69 on target per match, AGF averages 13.57 shots with a 15% conversion rate, and in the last 5 matches Nordsjælland scored 8 goals versus AGF’s 5 — these figures indicate a high volume of scoring opportunities. Therefore I recommend backing the Over at 1.5 as the strongest signal (approximately 82% probability), although Over 2.5 also carries a moderate chance (around 61%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time (X/1). At half-time the statistics are very balanced: Nordsjælland averages 0.85 goals, AGF 1.00, and considering that hosts concede an average of 0.31 goals to the break while visitors concede 0.43, the expected number of goals by half is approximately (0.85+0.43)/2=0.64 for the home side and (1.00+0.31)/2=0.655 for the away side, which favors a draw. After the break Nordsjælland gains the advantage — the hosts’ xG is 2.24 versus AGF’s 1.54, average shots 19.0 vs 13.57, and in the last five matches the hosts have four wins (80%) compared to one win (20%) for the visitors. Additionally, in their last five fixtures Nordsjælland scored on average 1.2 goals in second halves versus 0.4 for AGF and collected an average of 2.4 points in second halves compared to 1.2 points for the visitors, suggesting an advantage after the break. AGF do, however, score frequently away (an average of 2.0 goals per away match and 93% of their matches end with both teams scoring), so I expect a draw at half-time followed by a home turnaround to win.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

58Possession (%)42
NordsjællandAGF
20Shots12
NordsjællandAGF
11Shots on target5
NordsjællandAGF
2.44xG1.44
NordsjællandAGF
7Corners3
NordsjællandAGF
57Dangerous attacks45
NordsjællandAGF
18Fouls3
NordsjællandAGF
2Cards0
NordsjællandAGF

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.67Goals scored / game1.89
NordsjællandAGF
1.56Goals allowed / game1.04
NordsjællandAGF
57%Average possession54%
NordsjællandAGF
5.37Shots on target / game5.78
NordsjællandAGF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game16.19
NordsjællandAGF
5.37Shots on target5.78
NordsjællandAGF
12.8%Shot conversion11.7%
NordsjællandAGF
57%Possession54%
NordsjællandAGF
1.58xG for1.88
NordsjællandAGF
1.43xG against1.27
NordsjællandAGF

Shooting quality

Nordsjælland: BalancedAGF: Attacking
NordsjællandAGF
Accuracy (shots on target)41%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nordsjælland is 117% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / game - Nordsjælland · 1.2 pts / game - AGF

Nordsjælland
WWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
52% W7% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-2-11
1.63 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-1-4
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
AGF
DDWDL
Season result split
59% W30% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-8-3
2.07 pts / game · goal difference +23
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
8-5-1
Last 5 away
2-2-1
DWDWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.20BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AGF is 13% better for: goals scored per game.

1.67 goals / game - Nordsjælland · 1.89 goals / game - AGF

AGF is 50% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.56 goals / game - Nordsjælland · 1.04 goals / game - AGF

Nordsjælland scoring profile: very strong

Nordsjælland scores in 81% of games (22 of 27 meczów), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 26% (7 of 27 meczów).

AGF scoring profile: very strong

AGF scores in 93% of games (25 of 27 meczów), while Nordsjælland keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 meczów).

45Goals scored (season)51
NordsjællandAGF
42Goals conceded (season)28
NordsjællandAGF
3.22Average goals per game2.93
NordsjællandAGF
8Goals scored (last 5)5
NordsjællandAGF
3Goals conceded (last 5)5
NordsjællandAGF

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal93%
NordsjællandAGF
52%2 goals56%
NordsjællandAGF
19%3 goals22%
NordsjællandAGF
7%4 goals11%
NordsjællandAGF

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal74%
NordsjællandAGF
41%2 goals22%
NordsjællandAGF
26%3 goals7%
NordsjællandAGF
11%4 goals0%
NordsjællandAGF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time26%
NordsjællandAGF
7%BTTS in both halves0%
NordsjællandAGF
30%Scored in both halves26%
NordsjællandAGF

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
NordsjællandAGF
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
NordsjællandAGF
60%BTTS - last 580%
NordsjællandAGF

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
NordsjællandAGF
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
NordsjællandAGF
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
NordsjællandAGF

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
NordsjællandAGF
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
NordsjællandAGF
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time26%
NordsjællandAGF

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AGF is 49% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / game - Nordsjælland · 2.15 pts / game - AGF

Nordsjælland - half-time state
37% leading33% draw30% trailing
AGF - half-time state
63% leading26% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per game (1st half)2.15
NordsjællandAGF
0.74Goals scored (1st half)0.93
NordsjællandAGF
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.37
NordsjællandAGF
1.33Average goals (1st half)1.3
NordsjællandAGF
59%Clean sheet before half-time63%
NordsjællandAGF
52%No goal before half-time33%
NordsjællandAGF

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per game (2nd half)1.7
NordsjællandAGF
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.96
NordsjællandAGF
0.96Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
NordsjællandAGF
1.89Average goals (2nd half)1.63
NordsjællandAGF
52%Clean sheet after half-time56%
NordsjællandAGF
37%No goal after half-time48%
NordsjællandAGF

Nordsjælland - second-half results

37% W22% D41% L
39
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 52%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

AGF - second-half results

44% W37% D19% L
58
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+15
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding94%

Leads at halftime in 63% of games and wins 59%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nordsjælland - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.40
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.40.2
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
AGF - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.20
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nordsjælland
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
4
5
16-30
10
2
31-45
7
6
46-60
9
7
61-75
9
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

AGF
ScoredConceded
9
4
0-15
7
3
16-30
9
3
31-45
5
6
46-60
11
2
61-75
10
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nordsjælland

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.97
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

AGF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.87
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).

Teams vs league

NordsjællandLigaAGF
Average goals per game 3.223.09 2.93
Both teams scored 52%61% 74%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 67%61% 56%
Clean sheets 30%22% 26%
Goal before half-time 74%73% 78%
Goal after half-time 81%79% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.09
Average goals per game
61%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.65
Home goals / game
1.44
Away goals / game
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. NordsjællandYellow cardPrince Amoako Junior
  2. NordsjællandYellow cardJustin Meltofte Janssen
  3. NordsjællandGoalLevy NeneAssist: Caleb Marfo Yirenkyi
  4. NordsjællandSubstitutionOn: Malte Såby HeydeOff: Mark Brink Christensen
  5. NordsjællandSubstitutionOn: Hjalte Boe Kling RasmussenOff: Ibrahim Adel

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Morten KroghMatches officiated: 15
3.93Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 233%Home wins40%Draws27%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Nordsjælland's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses against AGF. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

Aarhus Gymnastikforening
1 : 1
FC Nordsjælland
Aarhus Gymnastikforening
1 : 0
FC Nordsjælland
FC Nordsjælland
1 : 2
Aarhus Gymnastikforening

FAQ

What was the result of Nordsjælland vs AGF?

The Superliga match finished Nordsjælland 1:1 AGF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Nordsjælland and AGF?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Nordsjælland won 0, AGF won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Nordsjælland vs AGF?

Nordsjælland score 1.67 goals per game on average and AGF 1.89. The Superliga average is 3.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Nordsjælland's matches and 74% of AGF's.

What form are Nordsjælland and AGF in?

Over the last 5 games Nordsjælland have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and AGF 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nordsjælland vs AGF?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.