England - Premier LeagueData current as of September 12, 2026

Nottingham Forest vs Crystal Palace: match statistics

135%(1.95)
X35%(3.50)
230%(3.70)

The match promises to be very evenly balanced, justifying a draw prediction. Nottingham Forest shows better recent form over the last five matches (1.6 PPG) with two wins, while Crystal Palace is in a crisis with just 0.2 PPG and four consecutive defeats. However, the hosts have poor efficiency in home matches (27% win rate, 55% loss rate) and often fail to score (55% FTS%). Crystal Palace demonstrates solidity in away games with a goal difference of 0 and a 45% win rate, making them a dangerous opponent despite their poor recent form. Expected xG values indicate a slight advantage for the hosts (1.62 vs 1.14), but the difference is insufficient for a certain victory. Considering the statistics, the most probable outcomes appear to be a draw or a narrow win for either side.

Nottingham Forest vs Crystal Palace: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Nottingham Forest played against Crystal Palace in Premier League (England). The game was played on February 1, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Nottingham Forest has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Crystal Palace has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Nottingham Forest scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.48. Crystal Palace scores 1.04 and allows 1.22. Games in this league average 2.78 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 35% of Nottingham Forest's games and 48% of Crystal Palace's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 48%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Nottingham Forest has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.32 per game. Nottingham Forest takes 11.9 shots per game, while Crystal Palace takes 11.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Nottingham Forest leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.65 goals per game after halftime. Crystal Palace leads at halftime in 39% and scores 0.57 after halftime.

When the teams score

Nottingham Forest's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For Crystal Palace, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Premier League games average 2.78 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The match promises to be very evenly balanced, justifying a draw prediction. Nottingham Forest shows better recent form over the last five matches (1.6 PPG) with two wins, while Crystal Palace is in a crisis with just 0.2 PPG and four consecutive defeats. However, the hosts have poor efficiency in home matches (27% win rate, 55% loss rate) and often fail to score (55% FTS%). Crystal Palace demonstrates solidity in away games with a goal difference of 0 and a 45% win rate, making them a dangerous opponent despite their poor recent form. Expected xG values indicate a slight advantage for the hosts (1.62 vs 1.14), but the difference is insufficient for a certain victory. Considering the statistics, the most probable outcomes appear to be a draw or a narrow win for either side.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

33Possession (%)67
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
9Shots14
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
1Shots on target3
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
1.02xG1.64
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
5Corners7
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
53Dangerous attacks77
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
4Fouls12
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
3Cards3
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
1Goals scored / game1.04
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
1.48Goals allowed / game1.22
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
49%Average possession43%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
3.78Shots on target / game3.91
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.87Shots per game11.52
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
3.78Shots on target3.91
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
8.4%Shot conversion9.1%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
49%Possession43%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
1.41xG for1.32
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
1.45xG against1.38
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

Shooting quality

Nottingham Forest: BalancedCrystal Palace: Balanced
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Nottingham Forest is 250% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Nottingham Forest · 0.4 pts / game - Crystal Palace

Nottingham Forest
LLWDW
Season result split
30% W17% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-12
1.09 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-6
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.38Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Crystal Palace
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
30% W30% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-9
1.22 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WWLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Crystal Palace is 21% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.48 goals / game - Nottingham Forest · 1.22 goals / game - Crystal Palace

Nottingham Forest scoring profile: mixed

Nottingham Forest scores in 52% of games (12 of 23 meczów), while Crystal Palace keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 meczów).

Crystal Palace scoring profile: strong

Crystal Palace scores in 65% of games (15 of 23 meczów), while Nottingham Forest keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 meczów).

23Goals scored (season)24
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
34Goals conceded (season)28
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
2.48Average goals per game2.26
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
5Goals scored (last 5)3
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
6Goals conceded (last 5)8
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

How often they score at least...

52%1 goal65%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
30%2 goals30%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
17%3 goals9%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
0%4 goals0%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal65%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
48%2 goals35%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
22%3 goals17%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
0%4 goals4%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

35%
Nottingham Forest - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.8 of 23 meczów
55%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time9%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
17%Scored in both halves22%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

BTTS and goal count

26%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
26%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
40%BTTS - last 560%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time74%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
48%Min. 2 goals after half-time48%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Crystal Palace is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.87 pts / game - Nottingham Forest · 1.52 pts / game - Crystal Palace

Nottingham Forest - half-time state
17% leading35% draw48% trailing
Crystal Palace - half-time state
39% leading35% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.87Points per game (1st half)1.52
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
0.35Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
1Average goals (1st half)0.91
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
43%Clean sheet before half-time65%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
74%No goal before half-time52%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

After half-time (2nd half)

1.26Points per game (2nd half)1.04
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
1.48Average goals (2nd half)1.35
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
52%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace
57%No goal after half-time61%
Nottingham ForestCrystal Palace

Nottingham Forest - second-half results

35% W22% D43% L
20
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Crystal Palace - second-half results

22% W39% D39% L
35
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.52
PPG before half-time
Lead holding77%

Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 30%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Nottingham Forest - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.40
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Crystal Palace - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.20
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game0.41.2
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference0-5
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Nottingham Forest
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
9
31-45
7
6
46-60
3
1
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Crystal Palace
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
4
0
16-30
6
9
31-45
1
5
46-60
6
5
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.37
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Nottingham Forest

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Crystal Palace

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.16
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier League).

Teams vs league

Nottingham ForestLigaCrystal Palace
Average goals per game 2.482.78 2.26
Both teams scored 35%55% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 52%54% 48%
Clean sheets 22%26% 35%
Goal before half-time 74%72% 74%
Goal after half-time 78%81% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.56
Home goals / game
1.23
Away goals / game
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Nottingham ForestGoalMorgan Anthony Gibbs-White
  2. Crystal PalaceYellow cardChristopher Jeffrey Richards
  3. Crystal PalaceYellow cardChadi Riad Dnanou
  4. Nottingham ForestRed cardNeco Shay Williams
  5. Nottingham ForestSubstitutionOn: Felipe Rodrigues da SilvaOff: Nicolás Martín Domínguez
  6. Crystal PalaceGoalIsmaïla Sarr
  7. Crystal PalaceYellow cardYeremi Jesús Pino Santos
  8. Crystal PalaceSubstitutionOn: Christantus Ugonna UcheOff: Chadi Riad Dnanou
  9. Nottingham ForestSubstitutionOn: Dan NdoyeOff: Igor Jesus Maciel da Cruz
  10. Nottingham ForestYellow cardNikola Milenković

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Michael SalisburyMatches officiated: 14
4.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 250%Home wins36%Draws14%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Nottingham Forest's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Crystal Palace. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

Crystal Palace FC
1 : 1
Nottingham Forest FC

FAQ

What was the result of Nottingham Forest vs Crystal Palace?

The Premier League match finished Nottingham Forest 1:1 Crystal Palace. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Nottingham Forest vs Crystal Palace?

Nottingham Forest score 1.00 goals per game on average and Crystal Palace 1.04. The Premier League average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Nottingham Forest's matches and 48% of Crystal Palace's.

What form are Nottingham Forest and Crystal Palace in?

Over the last 5 games Nottingham Forest have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Crystal Palace 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nottingham Forest vs Crystal Palace?

The statistical background for Nottingham Forest vs Crystal Palace — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.