Nueva Chicago vs Midland: match statistics
Nueva Chicago vs Midland: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Nueva Chicago played against Midland in Prim B Nacional (Argentina). The game was played on April 13, 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Recent form
Nueva Chicago has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Midland has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Nueva Chicago scores 1.14 goals per game and allows 0.57. Midland scores 0.86 and allows 0.43. Games in this league average 1.87 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of Nueva Chicago's games and 29% of Midland's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 14%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 30% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Midland has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.06 per game. Nueva Chicago takes 8.6 shots per game, while Midland takes 15.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Nueva Chicago leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Midland leads at halftime in 43% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Nueva Chicago's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). For Midland, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Prim B Nacional games average 1.87 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 30% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nueva Chicago has a slight defensive edge at home — concedes on average 0.33 goals per game and records clean sheets in 67% of matches, while Midland concedes 0.67 on the road and also posts 67% clean sheets. In attack the hosts score 1.00 goal per home match with xG 1.26 and a conversion rate of 10% (4.67 shots on target), whereas Midland scores 0.67 away with a higher xG 1.51 but low conversion of 5% (4.33 shots on target). That indicates Midland creates more high-quality chances (xG 1.51 vs 1.26) but is inefficient at finishing them (0.67 goals from xG 1.51), while Nueva Chicago converts opportunities more effectively. In the last five matches Nueva Chicago have a 3-1-1 record (average 2.0 pts/game), and Midland 3-2-0 (average 2.2 pts/game), reflecting comparable form. Given the hosts' higher shot efficiency and lower average goals conceded I project a Nueva Chicago win; probabilities: 55% for '1', 30% for draw, 15% for '2'.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - No because season BTTS rates are low: 25% for Nueva Chicago and 33% for Midland, alongside high clean sheet expected rates of 75% and 67%. The defensive profile is supported by goals conceded averages: Nueva Chicago concedes only 0.25 goals per match on the season (0.8 in the last 5), and Midland 0.67 seasonally and just 0.2 in the last five, reducing the likelihood of both teams scoring. Although xG indicates some chances (xG_for 1.92 for Nueva Chicago vs 1.51 for Midland), low shot conversion of 6% and 5% and season goal totals of 8 and 6 show created chances rarely translate into goals. Additionally the league BTTS is 38% with 78% clean sheets, and the last 5 matches for both teams produced 7 and 5 goals respectively, reinforcing the No Goal scenario as more probable.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model projects 1.60 expected goals for Nueva Chicago (xG_for 1.92 vs xG_against Midland 1.27 → (1.92+1.27)/2=1.60) and 1.24 for Midland ((1.51+0.97)/2=1.24), totalling 2.84 goals. Season averages are 1.0 goals for the home side and 0.67 for the away side, but in the last 5 matches the home team has scored 1.4 on average and the away team 1.0, which increases the probability of at least two goals. Additionally, the home side averages 16.75 shots (4.5 shots on target) versus 12.67 (4.33 shots on target) for the visitors, and conversion rates of 6% and 5% respectively, confirming chance creation. On the other hand, high clean sheet rates of 75% (home) and 67% (away) and low percentages of BTTS matches (25% and 33%) limit the likelihood of a high-scoring game, while season Over 2.5 stands at 0% for the home team and 33% for the away. As a result, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (72% probability), Over 2.5 is assessed as moderate (58%), and Over 3.5 has low chances (15%); therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (Nueva Chicago leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time) because the home side holds a clear advantage in xG and chance creation: xG_for 1.92 versus 1.51 for Midland, with an average of 16.75 shots to 12.67 and 4.5 on target to 4.33. The hosts led at the break in 2 of 4 matches (50%) and average 0.5 goals at Half-Time with 0.0 conceded, while the visitors average 0.33 scored and 0.67 conceded by the break, favoring a Nueva Chicago lead after 45 minutes. Post-break the home advantage persists statistically — 2.0 points per home game versus 1.33 for the away side and a seasonal goals average of 1.0 vs 0.67 — so leads are frequently converted into wins. Additionally, the league has a high clean sheet rate (78%), increasing the likelihood of a low 1:0 Full-Time score and making 1/1 the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Nueva Chicago | Midland | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Midland is 10% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Nueva Chicago · 2.2 pts / game - Midland
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Nueva Chicago is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1.14 goals / game - Nueva Chicago · 0.86 goals / game - Midland
Midland is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.57 goals / game - Nueva Chicago · 0.43 goals / game - Midland
Nueva Chicago scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while Midland keeps a clean sheet in 71% (5 of 7 meczów).
Midland scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 meczów), while Nueva Chicago keeps a clean sheet in 57% (4 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Nueva Chicago
Over / Under - Midland
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Midland is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / game - Nueva Chicago · 1.71 pts / game - Midland
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Nueva Chicago - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 57%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Midland - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Nueva Chicago
Midland
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prim B Nacional).
Teams vs league
| Nueva Chicago | Liga | Midland | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.71 | 1.87 | ▼ 1.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 38% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 29% | 30% | ▼ 14% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 57% | 39% | ▲ 71% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 43% | 62% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 72% | ▼ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Nueva Chicago vs Midland?
The Prim B Nacional match finished Nueva Chicago 2:2 Midland. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Nueva Chicago vs Midland?
Nueva Chicago score 1.14 goals per game on average and Midland 0.86. The Prim B Nacional average is 1.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 29% of Nueva Chicago's matches and 29% of Midland's.
What form are Nueva Chicago and Midland in?
Over the last 5 games Nueva Chicago have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Midland 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Nueva Chicago vs Midland?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.