United States - USL League OneMCU ParkData current as of October 22, 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

NY Cosmos vs Spokane Velocity: match statistics

NY Cosmos vs Spokane Velocity: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

NY Cosmos plays Spokane Velocity in USL League One (United States). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: MCU Park.

Recent form

NY Cosmos has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Spokane Velocity has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

NY Cosmos scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 2.07. Spokane Velocity scores 1.57 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.00 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of NY Cosmos's games and 53% of Spokane Velocity's. The Over 2.5 rates are 77% and 60%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

NY Cosmos has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.43 per game. NY Cosmos takes 12.2 shots per game, while Spokane Velocity takes 12.0.

First-half and second-half trends

NY Cosmos leads at halftime in 13% of its games and scores 0.83 goals per game after halftime. Spokane Velocity leads at halftime in 37% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

NY Cosmos's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Spokane Velocity, it is minutes 31-45+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL League One games average 3.00 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
1.2Goals scored / game1.57
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
2.07Goals allowed / game1.33
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
48%Average possession50%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
4.03Shots on target / game3.97
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.17Shots per game12
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
4.03Shots on target3.97
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
9.9%Shot conversion13.1%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
48%Possession50%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
1.5xG for1.43
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
1.64xG against1.43
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

Shooting quality

NY Cosmos: BalancedSpokane Velocity: Efficient finishing
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
Accuracy (shots on target)33%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Spokane Velocity is 233% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - NY Cosmos · 2 pts / game - Spokane Velocity

NY Cosmos
LWLLL
Season result split
23% W13% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-19
0.83 pts / game · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-7
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
WLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.77BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 100%
Spokane Velocity
WDWLW
Season result split
53% W17% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
16-5-9
1.77 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-6
Last 5 away
3-0-2
LWWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Spokane Velocity is 31% better for: goals scored per game.

1.2 goals / game - NY Cosmos · 1.57 goals / game - Spokane Velocity

Spokane Velocity is 56% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.07 goals / game - NY Cosmos · 1.33 goals / game - Spokane Velocity

NY Cosmos scoring profile: very strong

NY Cosmos scores in 77% of games (23 of 30 games), while Spokane Velocity keeps a clean sheet in 30% (9 of 30 games).

Spokane Velocity scoring profile: very strong

Spokane Velocity scores in 80% of games (24 of 30 games), while NY Cosmos keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 games).

36Goals scored (season)47
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
62Goals conceded (season)40
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
3.27Average goals per game2.9
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
5Goals scored (last 5)10
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal80%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
27%2 goals50%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
13%3 goals27%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
3%4 goals0%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal70%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
80%2 goals30%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
40%3 goals23%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
3%4 goals10%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
10%BTTS in both halves3%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
23%Scored in both halves27%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
60%BTTS - last 540%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time90%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time37%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Spokane Velocity is 86% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.77 pts / game - NY Cosmos · 1.43 pts / game - Spokane Velocity

NY Cosmos - half-time state
13% leading37% draw50% trailing
Spokane Velocity - half-time state
37% leading33% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.77Points per game (1st half)1.43
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.73
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
1.37Average goals (1st half)1.4
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
37%Clean sheet before half-time57%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
73%No goal before half-time53%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per game (2nd half)1.6
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
1.9Average goals (2nd half)1.5
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
33%Clean sheet after half-time57%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity
27%No goal after half-time40%
NY CosmosSpokane Velocity

NY Cosmos - second-half results

27% W37% D37% L
23
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-19
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding177%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 23%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Spokane Velocity - second-half results

47% W20% D33% L
43
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
48
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.43
PPG before half-time
Lead holding143%

Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

NY Cosmos - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.80
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game1.41.0
Average goals per game1.81.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-5-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Spokane Velocity - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.00
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.0
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

NY Cosmos
ScoredConceded
2
9
0-15
5
8
16-30
4
13
31-45
10
12
46-60
3
9
61-75
12
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Spokane Velocity
ScoredConceded
4
10
0-15
8
3
16-30
10
7
31-45
8
7
46-60
10
4
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+30%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

NY Cosmos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
167%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Spokane Velocity

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
127%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
76%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).

Teams vs league

NY CosmosLigaSpokane Velocity
Average goals per game▲ 3.273.00▼ 2.90
Both teams scored▲ 63%60%▼ 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 77%61%• 60%
Clean sheets▼ 17%23%▲ 30%
Goal before half-time▼ 73%75%▼ 73%
Goal after half-time▲ 90%81%▲ 90%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / game
1.24
Away goals / game
+42%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from NY Cosmos's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Spokane Velocity. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.