United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of September 20, 2026

Oakland Roots vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: match statistics

Oakland Roots vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Oakland Roots played against Pittsburgh Riverhounds in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on August 2, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Oakland Roots has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Pittsburgh Riverhounds has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Oakland Roots scores 1.60 goals per game and allows 1.47. Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores 1.27 and allows 1.20. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 73% of Oakland Roots's games and 47% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 47%, compared with league averages of 58% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Oakland Roots has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.24 per game. Oakland Roots takes 11.8 shots per game, while Pittsburgh Riverhounds takes 9.7.

First-half and second-half trends

Oakland Roots leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. Pittsburgh Riverhounds leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.87 after halftime.

When the teams score

Oakland Roots's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For Pittsburgh Riverhounds, it is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

USL Championship games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 58% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Oakland shows better home metrics: on average 1.22 goals per match, 10.89 shots and 3.44 on target with an average xG of 1.32, whereas Pittsburgh away averages 1.00 goal, 8.38 shots, 3.00 on target and xG 1.13. However, in form over the last five matches the edge lies with the visitors: Pittsburgh scored 6 and conceded 6 (1.2 per match) and averages 1.2 points in the last five, while Oakland also scored 7 but conceded 13 (2.6 per match) and has only 0.6 points in that period. The table gap (Oakland 18th, Pittsburgh 11th) and a higher clean sheet rate for guests on the road (25% vs 11% for hosts) suggest greater defensive stability for Pittsburgh, despite hosts having a neutral home balance on the season (1.22–1.22 and goal difference 0). Considering the hosts’ advantage in quality of chances (higher xG 1.32 vs 1.13 and greater shot volume), but their clear defensive crisis in the last five, the most likely outcome is a draw, although the match may be tight and low-scoring. I propose a probability split: 33% Oakland win, 34% draw and 33% Pittsburgh win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis indicates a favorable BTTS scenario: Oakland has 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches, Pittsburgh 40% in the same period, and the league BTTS level is 56%. Over the last 5 matches Oakland conceded on average 2.6 goals (13 conceded) and scored 1.4 goals (7 scored), while Pittsburgh scored 6 goals in their last 5 (1.2 per game) and averages 1.0 goal season-wide. xG shows 1.38 xG for Oakland versus 1.42 xG against Pittsburgh, and 1.13 xG for Pittsburgh versus 1.13 xG against Oakland, meaning expected goal values for both teams sit around 1.1–1.4 and favor both teams scoring. Although Oakland’s season BTTS is lower (38%) than Pittsburgh’s (50%), the low clean sheet rates of 25% for both teams and a league average goals of 2.74 suggest a scoreline without a goal for one side is less likely. Considering the strong recent 5-match signal from Oakland, both teams’ xG profiles and the league BTTS level, I tip BTTS - Yes at 65% versus 35% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG and defensive-stat model yields expected goals: Oakland Roots 1.40 (offensive xG 1.38 and Pittsburgh defense concedes 1.42 xG) and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1.13 (offensive xG 1.13 and Oakland defense concedes 1.13), totaling 2.53 goals. This season Oakland has 63% of matches over 1.5 goals, and Pittsburgh 75%, with both teams rarely finishing 0-0 (Oakland 100% of matches >0.5, Pittsburgh 88%), which strongly supports Over 1.5. In the last 5 matches Oakland averaged 4.0 goals per game (7 scored and 13 conceded), and Pittsburgh 2.4 (6 scored and 6 conceded); Oakland concedes on average 2.6 goals in those five games, increasing the probability of more than two goals. Shot stats (Oakland 11.0 shots and 4.0 on target vs Pittsburgh 8.38/3.0) and xG ratios confirm the hosts' offensive edge. Consequently I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (estimated Over ~72%), while Over 2.5 is rated ~46% and Over 3.5 ~25%.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Half-time statistics indicate a draw as the most frequent state: Oakland led at the break in 25% of matches, was level at half-time in 75% and was never trailing (0%), while Pittsburgh led at the break in 25%, was level in 25% and was trailing at the break in 50%. Oakland has 100% clean sheets at half-time (seasonCSPercentageHT_home = 100%) with an average goals scored by half-time of 0.38 and average conceded 0.0, whereas Pittsburgh concedes on average 0.63 goals by the break (concededAVGHT_away = 0.63), which strongly supports a goalless or draw scoreline after 45 minutes. Over the full match the home side are clearly stronger: they win 63% of fixtures and score on average 1.38 goals per match versus Pittsburgh who win 25% and score 1.0; xG also favors Oakland (1.38 vs 1.13), so from a draw at half-time a turnaround to a home win is more likely. Additionally Oakland scored 5 goals in the 46–60 minute window, averages 4 shots on target per match versus 3 for the visitors and has a marginally better conversion rate (13% vs 12%), suggesting decisive goals may come after the break; therefore I pick X/1 as the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
-1Shots-1
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
-1Shots on target-1
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
0xG0
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
-1Corners-1
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
0Dangerous attacks0
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
-1Fouls-1
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
-1Cards-1
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.6Goals scored / game1.27
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.47Goals allowed / game1.2
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
55%Average possession49%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
3.73Shots on target / game3.47
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.8Shots per game9.67
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
3.73Shots on target3.47
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
13.6%Shot conversion13.1%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
55%Possession49%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.41xG for1.24
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.47xG against1.29
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

Shooting quality

Oakland Roots: Efficient finishingPittsburgh Riverhounds: Efficient finishing
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
Accuracy (shots on target)32%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Oakland Roots · 1.4 pts / game - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Oakland Roots
LDDWL
Season result split
33% W40% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-4
1.40 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WWLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
WDLLW
Season result split
47% W13% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-6
1.53 pts / game · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLWDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Oakland Roots is 26% better for: goals scored per game.

1.6 goals / game - Oakland Roots · 1.27 goals / game - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Pittsburgh Riverhounds is 23% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.47 goals / game - Oakland Roots · 1.2 goals / game - Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Oakland Roots scoring profile: very strong

Oakland Roots scores in 80% of games (12 of 15 games), while Pittsburgh Riverhounds keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 games).

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scoring profile: very strong

Pittsburgh Riverhounds scores in 67% of games (10 of 15 games), while Oakland Roots keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 games).

24Goals scored (season)19
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
22Goals conceded (season)18
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
3.07Average goals per game2.47
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
6Goals scored (last 5)5
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal67%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
53%2 goals40%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
13%3 goals20%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
13%4 goals0%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal73%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
47%2 goals40%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
13%3 goals7%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
0%4 goals0%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

47%
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.7 of 15 games
58%
League average

Goal patterns

27%BTTS at half-time7%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
13%BTTS in both halves7%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
40%Scored in both halves27%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
60%BTTS - last 540%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

Full game - team comparison (Over)

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Oakland Roots - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - half-time state
27% leading47% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per game (1st half)1.27
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.27Average goals (1st half)0.73
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
53%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
47%No goal before half-time67%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

After half-time (2nd half)

1.53Points per game (2nd half)1.47
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.87
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
47%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds
33%No goal after half-time40%
Oakland RootsPittsburgh Riverhounds

Oakland Roots - second-half results

40% W33% D27% L
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding122%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds - second-half results

40% W27% D33% L
19
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Oakland Roots - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.402.20
Goals scored / game0.01.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-4+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Pittsburgh Riverhounds - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.40
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game0.21.8
1 goal20%80%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Oakland Roots
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
3
0
16-30
4
3
31-45
5
2
46-60
2
5
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Pittsburgh Riverhounds
ScoredConceded
3
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
0
2
31-45
7
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.77
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+26%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Oakland Roots

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Pittsburgh Riverhounds

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

Oakland RootsLigaPittsburgh Riverhounds
Average goals per game 3.072.79 2.47
Both teams scored 73%58% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%52% 47%
Clean sheets 13%26% 27%
Goal before half-time 73%67% 60%
Goal after half-time 87%80% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / game
1.25
Away goals / game
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsYellow cardEliot Goldthorp
  2. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsGoalEliot GoldthorpAssist: Maximiliano Viera
  3. Oakland RootsSubstitutionOn: Bertin JacquessonOff: Tommy McCabe
  4. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsSubstitutionOn: Samuel BassettOff: Yu Tsukanome
  5. Oakland RootsSubstitutionOn: Daniel Trejo Del RioOff: Tucker Lepley
  6. Oakland RootsYellow cardMichael Joseph Edwards
  7. Oakland RootsSubstitutionOn: Faysal BettacheOff: Daniel Trejo Del Rio
  8. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsSubstitutionOn: Guillaume VacterOff: Joao Victor Souza
  9. Pittsburgh RiverhoundsYellow cardDaniel Griffin

Head-to-head

Record from Oakland Roots's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Oakland Roots SC
0 : 2
Pittsburgh Riverhounds FC
Pittsburgh Riverhounds
5 : 0
Oakland Roots

FAQ

What was the result of Oakland Roots vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

The USL Championship match finished Oakland Roots 0:1 Pittsburgh Riverhounds. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Oakland Roots and Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Oakland Roots won 0, Pittsburgh Riverhounds won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Oakland Roots vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

Oakland Roots score 1.60 goals per game on average and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 1.27. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Oakland Roots's matches and 47% of Pittsburgh Riverhounds's.

What form are Oakland Roots and Pittsburgh Riverhounds in?

Over the last 5 games Oakland Roots have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Pittsburgh Riverhounds 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Oakland Roots vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds?

The statistical background for Oakland Roots vs Pittsburgh Riverhounds — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.