Oita Trinita vs Imabari: match statistics
Oita Trinita vs Imabari: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Oita Trinita played against Imabari in J2 League (Japan). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: Ōita Bank Dome. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Oita Trinita has 1 win, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Imabari has 0 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Oita Trinita scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 0.75. Imabari scores 0.75 and allows 3.00. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 25% of Oita Trinita's games and 50% of Imabari's. The Over 2.5 rates are 25% and 100%, compared with league averages of 44% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Imabari has the higher season xG average, 1.30 to 1.17 per game. Oita Trinita takes 10.0 shots per game, while Imabari takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Oita Trinita leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Imabari leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Oita Trinita's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Imabari, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
J2 League games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 44% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Oita Trinita have made a clearly stronger start to the season, collecting 4 points from four matches, while Imabari have lost all 4 games and currently sit in 20th place. At home, the hosts score an average of 2 goals per match with an xG of 1.33, whereas the visitors score just 0.5 goals away from home despite averaging 11.5 shots. The strongest argument in Oita’s favor is Imabari’s defensive record, with the visitors conceding an average of 3 goals away from home, posting an xG against of 1.74, and losing 100% of their away matches. Oita have also struggled to keep clean sheets, conceding 5 goals in their last five matches, so the visitors may create chances; however, their conversion rate is just 4%, compared with 17% for the hosts. The advantage in finishing quality, combined with Imabari’s poor away form, points to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is weakened primarily by Oita Trinita, who have averaged just 0.8 goals across their last 5 matches and recorded BTTS - Yes in only 20% of their games. Imabari do have a very weak defense, conceding an average of 2.6 goals in their last 5 appearances, but Oita manage only 3.0 shots on target per match and convert 7% of their attempts. The visitors show greater attacking potential, averaging 1.4 goals and an xG of 1.43 across their last 5 fixtures, while the hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet even once this season. Nevertheless, Imabari have also been held scoreless in 50% of their league matches, while both teams have a BTTS rate of 50%, compared with the league average of 45%. Therefore, BTTS - No is the most likely scenario, as at least one side—particularly the hosts, given their weaker current scoring form—may fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have gone over 1.5 goals in 100% of their league matches so far, with the average total number of goals standing at 4.0 for each side. Imabari have conceded an average of 2.6 goals in their last five matches, along with 1.70 xG allowed to opponents, which clearly strengthens Oita’s potential to score. The hosts create an average of 1.39 xG, while the visitors average 1.21 xG, and neither defense has kept a clean sheet yet. Oita have had Over 2.5 goals land in only 20% of their last five appearances, making Over 2.5 less reliable despite Imabari’s very open defensive profile. The strongest signal is for Over 1.5, as just two goals already align well with both the season data and the defensive profile of the two teams.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest HT/FT variant is a draw at half-time followed by an Oita victory, as the hosts were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with Imabari in 2 of 5. The first halves should be cautious: Oita conceded an average of just 0.4 goals before the break in their last five matches, while both teams scored an average of 0.6 goals. After the interval, the advantage shifts towards the hosts, as Imabari conceded an average of 2.0 goals in second halves and allowed at least two goals after the break in each of their last five matches. Oita also have a higher expected-goals figure for the season as a whole, 1.39 compared with 1.21, average 13.5 shots to their opponents’ 11.5, and convert their attempts more efficiently, 7% to 4%. Both teams have won 20% of their last five matches, but Imabari’s 80% loss rate and 2.6 goals conceded per match indicate that the hosts are more likely to turn an evenly balanced start in their favor.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Oita Trinita | Imabari | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Oita Trinita is 33% better for: goals scored per game.
1 goals / game - Oita Trinita · 0.75 goals / game - Imabari
Oita Trinita is 300% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.75 goals / game - Oita Trinita · 3 goals / game - Imabari
Oita Trinita scores in 25% of games (1 of 4 games), while Imabari keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 games).
Imabari scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 games), while Oita Trinita keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Oita Trinita
Over / Under - Imabari
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Oita Trinita is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Oita Trinita · 0.5 pts / game - Imabari
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Oita Trinita - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Imabari - second-half results
Allows 1.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.25 | 1.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.3 | 0.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 75% |
| No goal | 75% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.50 | 0.25 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.5 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 2.3 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 25% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 25% | 75% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 0% |
| No goal | 75% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Oita Trinita
Imabari
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).
Teams vs league
| Oita Trinita | Liga | Imabari | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.75 | 2.73 | ▲ 3.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 25% | 44% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 25% | 52% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 33% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 71% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 81% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Oita Trinita's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Imabari. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Oita Trinita vs Imabari?
The J2 League match finished Oita Trinita 1:1 Imabari. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Oita Trinita and Imabari?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Oita Trinita won 0, Imabari won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Oita Trinita vs Imabari?
Oita Trinita score 1.00 goals per game on average and Imabari 0.75. The J2 League average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Oita Trinita's matches and 50% of Imabari's.
What form are Oita Trinita and Imabari in?
Over the last 5 games Oita Trinita have a 1-1-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Imabari 0-0-4 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Oita Trinita vs Imabari?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Oita Trinita vs Imabari: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


