Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM: match statistics
RWDM appears to be the decisive favorite for this meeting. Olympic Charleroi presents alarming home form with 0% wins in matches at home and 83% losses, conceding an average of 2.25 goals per match. The hosts have not won any of their last twelve home matches, making them one of the weakest teams in the league at their own stadium. RWDM boasts significantly better offensive effectiveness (1.42 goals on average away vs 0.33 for the hosts at home) and goal difference (+1 away vs -23 for the hosts at home). The visitors also have 33% wins away and better chance conversion (11% vs 3%). Although the recent form of both teams is not impressive, RWDM's qualitative advantage in the confrontation with the weakest home team in the league should translate into a victory for the visitors.
Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Olympic Charleroi played against RWDM in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Olympic Charleroi has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. RWDM has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Olympic Charleroi scores 0.84 goals per game and allows 1.96. RWDM scores 1.54 and allows 1.65. Games in this league average 2.77 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 48% of Olympic Charleroi's games and 58% of RWDM's. The Over 2.5 rates are 56% and 58%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Olympic Charleroi has the higher season xG average, 1.41 to 1.38 per game. Olympic Charleroi takes 12.0 shots per game, while RWDM takes 12.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Olympic Charleroi leads at halftime in 12% of its games and scores 0.48 goals per game after halftime. RWDM leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.85 after halftime.
When the teams score
Olympic Charleroi's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For RWDM, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.77 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
RWDM appears to be the decisive favorite for this meeting. Olympic Charleroi presents alarming home form with 0% wins in matches at home and 83% losses, conceding an average of 2.25 goals per match. The hosts have not won any of their last twelve home matches, making them one of the weakest teams in the league at their own stadium. RWDM boasts significantly better offensive effectiveness (1.42 goals on average away vs 0.33 for the hosts at home) and goal difference (+1 away vs -23 for the hosts at home). The visitors also have 33% wins away and better chance conversion (11% vs 3%). Although the recent form of both teams is not impressive, RWDM's qualitative advantage in the confrontation with the weakest home team in the league should translate into a victory for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Olympic Charleroi | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.20 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
RWDM is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Olympic Charleroi · 1.2 pts / game - RWDM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 83% better for: goals scored per game.
0.84 goals / game - Olympic Charleroi · 1.54 goals / game - RWDM
RWDM is 19% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.96 goals / game - Olympic Charleroi · 1.65 goals / game - RWDM
Olympic Charleroi scores in 52% of games (13 of 25 games), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 games).
RWDM scores in 77% of games (20 of 26 games), while Olympic Charleroi keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 25 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Olympic Charleroi
Over / Under - RWDM
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RWDM is 78% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.76 pts / game - Olympic Charleroi · 1.35 pts / game - RWDM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Olympic Charleroi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 12% of games and wins 12%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 27%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Olympic Charleroi
RWDM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Olympic Charleroi | Liga | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.80 | 2.77 | ▲ 3.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 53% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 56% | 52% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 26% | ▼ 23% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 80% | 72% | ▼ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 78% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Olympic Charleroi's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against RWDM. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM?
The First Division B match finished Olympic Charleroi 0:2 RWDM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM?
Olympic Charleroi score 0.84 goals per game on average and RWDM 1.54. The First Division B average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Olympic Charleroi's matches and 58% of RWDM's.
What form are Olympic Charleroi and RWDM in?
Over the last 5 games Olympic Charleroi have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RWDM 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM?
The statistical background for Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.