Belgium - First Division BData current as of 23 July 2026

Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM: match statistics

Olympic Charleroi crest
Olympic Charleroi
0 : 2half-time 0:1
RWDM crest
RWDM
120%(2.44)
X25%(3.30)
255%(2.54)

RWDM appears to be the decisive favorite for this meeting. Olympic Charleroi presents alarming home form with 0% wins in matches at home and 83% losses, conceding an average of 2.25 goals per match. The hosts have not won any of their last twelve home matches, making them one of the weakest teams in the league at their own stadium. RWDM boasts significantly better offensive effectiveness (1.42 goals on average away vs 0.33 for the hosts at home) and goal difference (+1 away vs -23 for the hosts at home). The visitors also have 33% wins away and better chance conversion (11% vs 3%). Although the recent form of both teams is not impressive, RWDM's qualitative advantage in the confrontation with the weakest home team in the league should translate into a victory for the visitors.

Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Olympic Charleroi play RWDM in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 7 March 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Olympic Charleroi: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. RWDM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Olympic Charleroi scores 0.81 and concedes 2.13 goals per match. RWDM scores 1.56 and concedes 1.69. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Olympic Charleroi 50%, RWDM 63%. Over 2.5: Olympic Charleroi 59%, RWDM 59%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Olympic Charleroi has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.33. Olympic Charleroi: 12.0 shots per match, RWDM: 11.5.

Match halves

Olympic Charleroi: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.53. RWDM: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.84.

Goals by minute

Olympic Charleroi: 76-90+ (10 goals). RWDM: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

RWDM appears to be the decisive favorite for this meeting. Olympic Charleroi presents alarming home form with 0% wins in matches at home and 83% losses, conceding an average of 2.25 goals per match. The hosts have not won any of their last twelve home matches, making them one of the weakest teams in the league at their own stadium. RWDM boasts significantly better offensive effectiveness (1.42 goals on average away vs 0.33 for the hosts at home) and goal difference (+1 away vs -23 for the hosts at home). The visitors also have 33% wins away and better chance conversion (11% vs 3%). Although the recent form of both teams is not impressive, RWDM's qualitative advantage in the confrontation with the weakest home team in the league should translate into a victory for the visitors.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
6Shots8
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
2Shots on target6
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
0.65xG1.02
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
9Corners3
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
15Dangerous attacks11
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
12Fouls9
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
2Cards1
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Olympic CharleroiRWDM
0.81Goals scored / match1.56
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
2.13Goals conceded / match1.69
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
47%Average possession48%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
4.16Shots on target / match4.38
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12Shots per match11.5
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
4.16Shots on target4.38
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
6.8%Shot conversion13.6%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
47%Possession48%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
1.37xG for1.33
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
1.58xG against1.54
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

Shooting quality

Olympic Charleroi: BalancedRWDM: Efficient finishing
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
Accuracy (shots on target)35%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.190.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Olympic Charleroi
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
9% W22% R69% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-7-22
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -42
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-14
Last 5 at home
0-0-5
LLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 2.11BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
RWDM
LDLWL
Season result split
28% W28% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-4-7
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 93% better for: goals scored per match.

0.81 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.56 goals / match - RWDM

RWDM is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.13 goals / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.69 goals / match - RWDM

Olympic Charleroi scoring profile: strong

Olympic Charleroi scores in 53% of matches (17 of 32 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

RWDM scoring profile: very strong

RWDM scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Olympic Charleroi keeps a clean sheet in 9% (3 of 32 matches).

26Goals scored (season)50
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
68Goals conceded (season)54
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
2.94Average goals in match3.25
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
3Goals scored (last 5)8
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
13Goals conceded (last 5)11
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal81%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
16%2 goals50%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
9%3 goals19%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
3%4 goals3%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

How often they concede at least...

91%1 goal78%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
66%2 goals53%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
38%3 goals31%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
13%4 goals6%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
Olympic Charleroi - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.16 of 32 matches
55%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time25%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
6%BTTS in both halves13%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
13%Scored in both halves34%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS53%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
19%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time72%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
53%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
34%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RWDM is 114% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.66 pts / match - Olympic Charleroi · 1.41 pts / match - RWDM

Olympic Charleroi - half-time state
9% leading38% draw53% trailing
RWDM - half-time state
34% leading38% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.66Points per match (1st half)1.41
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
0.28Goals scored (1st half)0.72
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
0.91Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.38
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
31%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
72%No goal before half-time41%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

After half-time (2nd half)

0.69Points per match (2nd half)1.16
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.84
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
1.22Goals conceded (2nd half)1.03
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.88
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
34%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM
63%No goal after half-time44%
Olympic CharleroiRWDM

Olympic Charleroi - second-half results

9% W41% R50% P
21
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-20
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-22
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.66
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 9%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RWDM - second-half results

28% W31% R41% P
45
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Olympic Charleroi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.80
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.6
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-5-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Olympic Charleroi
ScoredConceded
3
11
0-15
4
7
16-30
2
11
31-45
3
10
46-60
4
11
61-75
10
18
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (18). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
9
7
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
9
46-60
6
7
61-75
13
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.09
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+94%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
43%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Olympic Charleroi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
55%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
155%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.50
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
114%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
116%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Olympic CharleroiLigaRWDM
Average goals in match 2.942.84 3.25
Both teams scored 50%55% 63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%54% 59%
Clean sheets 9%26% 22%
Goal before half-time 78%71% 72%
Goal after half-time 72%79% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Olympic Charleroi 0 - 1 - 0 RWDM. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM?

The First Division B match finished Olympic Charleroi 0:2 RWDM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM?

Olympic Charleroi score 0.81 goals per game on average and RWDM 1.56. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Olympic Charleroi's matches and 63% of RWDM's.

What form are Olympic Charleroi and RWDM in?

Over the last 5 games Olympic Charleroi have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and RWDM 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM?

The statistical background for Olympic Charleroi vs RWDM — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.