Morocco - Botola ProData current as of September 07, 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Olympic Safi vs CR Khemis Zemamra: match statistics

Olympic Safi vs CR Khemis Zemamra: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Olympic Safi plays CR Khemis Zemamra in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Recent form

Olympic Safi has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. CR Khemis Zemamra has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Olympic Safi scores 0.79 goals per game and allows 1.50. CR Khemis Zemamra scores 0.79 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 2.12 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 57% of Olympic Safi's games and 43% of CR Khemis Zemamra's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 43%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Olympic Safi has the higher season xG average, 1.24 to 1.23 per game. Olympic Safi takes 10.2 shots per game, while CR Khemis Zemamra takes 10.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Olympic Safi leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. CR Khemis Zemamra leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.57 after halftime.

When the teams score

Olympic Safi's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). For CR Khemis Zemamra, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Botola Pro games average 2.12 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
0.79Goals scored / game0.79
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
1.5Goals allowed / game1.29
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
49%Average possession50%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
3.29Shots on target / game3
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.21Shots per game10.07
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
3.29Shots on target3
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
7.7%Shot conversion7.8%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
49%Possession50%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
1.24xG for1.23
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
1.37xG against1.38
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

Shooting quality

Olympic Safi: BalancedCR Khemis Zemamra: Balanced
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
Accuracy (shots on target)32%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

CR Khemis Zemamra is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Olympic Safi · 1.6 pts / game - CR Khemis Zemamra

Olympic Safi
DDLDW
Season result split
14% W36% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-7
0.79 pts / game · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-3-3
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
LLLDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.47Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
CR Khemis Zemamra
WWDLD
Season result split
29% W29% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-6
1.14 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-5
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

CR Khemis Zemamra is 16% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.5 goals / game - Olympic Safi · 1.29 goals / game - CR Khemis Zemamra

Olympic Safi scoring profile: strong

Olympic Safi scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 meczów), while CR Khemis Zemamra keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 meczów).

CR Khemis Zemamra scoring profile: strong

CR Khemis Zemamra scores in 57% of games (8 of 14 meczów), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 meczów).

11Goals scored (season)11
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
21Goals conceded (season)18
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
2.29Average goals per game2.07
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
5Goals scored (last 5)5
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal57%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
7%2 goals21%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
7%3 goals0%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
0%4 goals0%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal64%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
43%2 goals43%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
14%3 goals21%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
7%4 goals0%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

43%
CR Khemis Zemamra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 14 meczów
47%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time7%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
0%Scored in both halves7%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
14%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
60%BTTS - last 540%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
14%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
14%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Olympic Safi - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing
CR Khemis Zemamra - half-time state
14% leading43% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.86Points per game (1st half)0.86
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.21
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.57
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
0.79Average goals (1st half)0.79
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
57%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
86%No goal before half-time79%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per game (2nd half)1.21
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.29
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
29%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra
50%No goal after half-time57%
Olympic SafiCR Khemis Zemamra

Olympic Safi - second-half results

21% W29% R50% P
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

CR Khemis Zemamra - second-half results

29% W36% R36% P
12
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.86
PPG before half-time
Lead holding207%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 29%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Olympic Safi - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.00
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.6
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
CR Khemis Zemamra - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.80
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game0.61.2
1 goal40%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Olympic Safi
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
5
31-45
1
5
46-60
2
3
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

CR Khemis Zemamra
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
6
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
4
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.19
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Olympic Safi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.58
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.45
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
150%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.41
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

CR Khemis Zemamra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Olympic SafiLigaCR Khemis Zemamra
Average goals per game 2.292.12 2.07
Both teams scored 57%47% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%36% 43%
Clean sheets 14%33% 36%
Goal before half-time 57%58% 64%
Goal after half-time 93%75% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.12
Average goals per game
47%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.12
Home goals / game
1.00
Away goals / game
+12%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defensive advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.