Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 19 July 2026

Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger: match statistics

Olympic Safi crest
Olympic Safi
1 : 2half-time 1:0
Ittihad Tanger crest
Ittihad Tanger

Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Olympic Safi play Ittihad Tanger in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 29 April 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Olympic Safi: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. Ittihad Tanger: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Olympic Safi scores 0.80 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Ittihad Tanger scores 0.90 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Olympic Safi 63%, Ittihad Tanger 53%. Over 2.5: Olympic Safi 37%, Ittihad Tanger 27%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

Ittihad Tanger has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.23. Olympic Safi: 9.6 shots per match, Ittihad Tanger: 10.4.

Match halves

Olympic Safi: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.43. Ittihad Tanger: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.57.

Goals by minute

Olympic Safi: 76-90+ (7 goals). Ittihad Tanger: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Olympic Safi (14th) and Ittihad Tanger (13th) have similar season records — both teams have 2 wins, but the home side recorded 6 draws and 8 losses while the visitors have 8 draws and 6 losses. In the last 5 matches Olympic scored 6 goals and has a 1-3-1 record (PPG 1.2), whereas Ittihad scored 3 goals and is 0-2-3 (PPG 0.4), which clearly favors the hosts in form. The hosts dominate possession (55% vs 49%), take slightly more shots on target per game (3.38 vs 3.13) and are less likely to finish matches goalless (FTS 25% vs 50%), indicating they create higher-quality chances. On the other hand the visitors have conceded 20 goals this season versus 25 for Safi and have comparable xG values (xG 1.33 for away Ittihad vs 1.34 xG for the hosts), which limits the home advantage. Considering better form, greater possession and a lower rate of scoreless games for Olympic, I predict a home win (60%), draw 25%, away win 15%.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
10Shots12
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
5Shots on target7
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1.32xG1.56
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1Corners4
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
46Dangerous attacks43
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
10Fouls14
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
5Cards2
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.8Goals scored / match0.9
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1.4Goals conceded / match1.03
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
50%Average possession49%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
3.43Shots on target / match3.27
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.6Shots per match10.4
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
3.43Shots on target3.27
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
8.3%Shot conversion8.7%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
50%Possession49%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1.23xG for1.3
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1.35xG against1.48
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Shooting quality

Olympic Safi: BalancedIttihad Tanger: Balanced
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
Accuracy (shots on target)36%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ittihad Tanger is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Olympic Safi · 1.4 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

Olympic Safi
LDDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
10% W43% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-13-14
0.73 pts / match · goal difference -18
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-5-8
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Ittihad Tanger
WLDLW
Season result split
30% W40% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-9
1.30 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-7
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ittihad Tanger is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

0.8 goals / match - Olympic Safi · 0.9 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

Ittihad Tanger is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - Olympic Safi · 1.03 goals / match - Ittihad Tanger

Olympic Safi scoring profile: very strong

Olympic Safi scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Ittihad Tanger keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).

Ittihad Tanger scoring profile: very strong

Ittihad Tanger scores in 67% of matches (20 of 30 matches), while Olympic Safi keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 30 matches).

24Goals scored (season)27
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
42Goals conceded (season)31
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
2.2Average goals in match1.93
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
7Goals conceded (last 5)5
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal67%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
7%2 goals23%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
3%3 goals0%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0%4 goals0%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

How often they concede at least...

87%1 goal80%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
40%2 goals20%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
10%3 goals3%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
3%4 goals0%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

52%
League average

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time10%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
3%Scored in both halves10%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
60%BTTS - last 540%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Olympic Safi is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - Olympic Safi · 1.07 pts / match - Ittihad Tanger

Olympic Safi - half-time state
27% leading37% draw37% trailing
Ittihad Tanger - half-time state
20% leading47% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.07
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.37Goals scored (1st half)0.33
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.8Average goals (1st half)0.83
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
60%Clean sheet before half-time57%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
70%No goal before half-time70%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

After half-time (2nd half)

0.77Points per match (2nd half)1.37
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)0.57
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
0.97Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.1
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
30%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger
57%No goal after half-time53%
Olympic SafiIttihad Tanger

Olympic Safi - second-half results

13% W37% R50% P
35
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-16
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding37%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 10%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ittihad Tanger - second-half results

33% W37% R30% P
32
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Olympic Safi - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match0.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ittihad Tanger - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Olympic Safi
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
5
16-30
6
7
31-45
2
11
46-60
4
8
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Ittihad Tanger
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
4
11
31-45
3
6
46-60
5
5
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.06
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-3%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Olympic Safi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.48
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
70%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Ittihad Tanger

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

Olympic SafiLigaIttihad Tanger
Average goals in match 2.202.17 1.93
Both teams scored 63%52% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%38% 27%
Clean sheets 13%30% 20%
Goal before half-time 67%63% 63%
Goal after half-time 83%73% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.15
Home goals / match
1.02
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+11%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Olympic Safi 0 - 1 - 0 Ittihad Tanger. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Ittihad Riadhi de Tanger
1 : 1
Olympique Club de Safi

FAQ

What was the result of Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger?

The Botola Pro match finished Olympic Safi 1:2 Ittihad Tanger. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger?

Olympic Safi score 0.80 goals per game on average and Ittihad Tanger 0.90. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Olympic Safi's matches and 53% of Ittihad Tanger's.

What form are Olympic Safi and Ittihad Tanger in?

Over the last 5 games Olympic Safi have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Ittihad Tanger 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Olympic Safi vs Ittihad Tanger?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.