Japan - J2 LeagueNACK5 Stadium ŌmiyaData current as of October 17, 2026

Omiya Ardija vs Kataller Toyama: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Omiya Ardija vs Kataller Toyama: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Omiya Ardija plays Kataller Toyama in J2 League (Japan). The game is scheduled for October 21, 2026. Venue: NACK5 Stadium Ōmiya.

Recent form

Omiya Ardija has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Kataller Toyama has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Omiya Ardija scores 1.91 goals per game and allows 1.00. Kataller Toyama scores 1.82 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.59 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 73% of Omiya Ardija's games and 45% of Kataller Toyama's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 45%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Kataller Toyama has the higher season xG average, 2.31 to 1.78 per game. Omiya Ardija takes 15.2 shots per game, while Kataller Toyama takes 20.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Omiya Ardija leads at halftime in 45% of its games and scores 1.18 goals per game after halftime. Kataller Toyama leads at halftime in 45% and scores 1.09 after halftime.

When the teams score

Omiya Ardija's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Kataller Toyama, it is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J2 League games average 2.59 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(2.13)
(3.70)
(2.85)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
1.91Goals scored / game1.82
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
1Goals allowed / game1
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
60%Average possession57%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
5.55Shots on target / game7.64
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

15.18Shots per game20.36
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
5.55Shots on target7.64
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
12.6%Shot conversion8.9%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
60%Possession57%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
1.78xG for2.31
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
1.22xG against1.27
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

Shooting quality

Omiya Ardija: DominantKataller Toyama: Dominant
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
Accuracy (shots on target)37%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Kataller Toyama is 13% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Omiya Ardija · 1.8 pts / game - Kataller Toyama

Omiya Ardija
DWDWL
Season result split
45% W45% D9% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-1
1.82 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 60%
Kataller Toyama
WDWDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
45% W36% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-2
1.73 pts / game · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-0-1
Last 5 away
4-0-1
LWWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 2.11Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Omiya Ardija is 5% better for: goals scored per game.

1.91 goals / game - Omiya Ardija · 1.82 goals / game - Kataller Toyama

Omiya Ardija scoring profile: strong

Omiya Ardija scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 games), while Kataller Toyama keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 games).

Kataller Toyama scoring profile: very strong

Kataller Toyama scores in 82% of games (9 of 11 games), while Omiya Ardija keeps a clean sheet in 27% (3 of 11 games).

21Goals scored (season)20
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
11Goals conceded (season)11
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
2.91Average goals per game2.82
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
11Goals scored (last 5)9
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
6Goals conceded (last 5)6
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal82%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
45%2 goals55%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
36%3 goals27%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
18%4 goals18%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal55%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
27%2 goals27%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
0%3 goals18%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
0%4 goals0%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

9%BTTS at half-time18%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
9%BTTS in both halves0%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
36%Scored in both halves36%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS27%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
100%BTTS - last 580%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time73%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
27%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kataller Toyama is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.55 pts / game - Omiya Ardija · 1.64 pts / game - Kataller Toyama

Omiya Ardija - half-time state
45% leading18% draw36% trailing
Kataller Toyama - half-time state
45% leading27% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.55Points per game (1st half)1.64
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.73
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
1.27Average goals (1st half)1.36
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
55%Clean sheet before half-time73%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
55%No goal before half-time36%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

After half-time (2nd half)

2.09Points per game (2nd half)1.82
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
1.18Goals scored (2nd half)1.09
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
1.64Average goals (2nd half)1.45
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
55%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama
27%No goal after half-time45%
Omiya ArdijaKataller Toyama

Omiya Ardija - second-half results

55% W45% D0% L
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.55
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Kataller Toyama - second-half results

55% W18% D27% L
18
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 45% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.3

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Omiya Ardija - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.202.60
Goals scored / game0.61.6
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference0+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 20% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kataller Toyama - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.80
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.6
Average goals per game1.21.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Omiya Ardija
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Kataller Toyama
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
4
3
16-30
4
3
31-45
5
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.87
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Omiya Ardija

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Kataller Toyama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
161%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J2 League).

Teams vs league

Omiya ArdijaLigaKataller Toyama
Average goals per game▲ 2.912.59▲ 2.82
Both teams scored▲ 73%54%▼ 45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 55%48%▼ 45%
Clean sheets• 27%27%▲ 45%
Goal before half-time▲ 82%68%▲ 73%
Goal after half-time▼ 73%78%▲ 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per game
54%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / game
1.13
Away goals / game
+29%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defensive advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Omiya Ardija's perspective: 1 win, 1 draw and 0 losses against Kataller Toyama. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Kataller Toyama
0 : 2
Omiya Ardija
Omiya Ardija
2 : 2
Kataller Toyama

FAQ

When do Omiya Ardija and Kataller Toyama play?

Omiya Ardija face Kataller Toyama on October 21, 2026 in J2 League at NACK5 Stadium Ōmiya. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Omiya Ardija and Kataller Toyama?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Omiya Ardija won 1, Kataller Toyama won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Omiya Ardija vs Kataller Toyama?

Omiya Ardija score 1.91 goals per game on average and Kataller Toyama 1.82. The J2 League average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Omiya Ardija's matches and 45% of Kataller Toyama's.

What form are Omiya Ardija and Kataller Toyama in?

Over the last 5 games Omiya Ardija have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Kataller Toyama 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Omiya Ardija vs Kataller Toyama?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Omiya Ardija vs Kataller Toyama: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.