Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics
MEAP Nisou demonstrates significantly better away and overall form compared to Omonia 29is Maiou at home. The visitors remain unbeaten on the road this season (50% wins, 50% draws) and boast an impressive +5 goal difference in away fixtures, whereas the hosts carry a negative -3 balance at home. MEAP Nisou generates an average of 1.96 xG away while conceding just 1.26 xG, highlighting their offensive superiority and solid defense. Omonia wins only 17% of home games and fails to score in 33%, which, combined with the visitors' scoring consistency (83% of matches with a goal), gives MEAP Nisou a distinct advantage. Furthermore, the visitors have averaged 2 points per game over their last five outings compared to just 1.6 for the hosts, confirming their superior current disposition.
Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Omonia 29is Maiou played against MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on January 10, 2026. Final score: 7:0.
Recent form
Omonia 29is Maiou has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. MEAP Nisou has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Omonia 29is Maiou scores 1.64 goals per game and allows 1.07. MEAP Nisou scores 1.29 and allows 1.43. Games in this league average 2.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Omonia 29is Maiou's games and 57% of MEAP Nisou's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 46% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
MEAP Nisou has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 1.63 per game. Omonia 29is Maiou takes 9.9 shots per game, while MEAP Nisou takes 9.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Omonia 29is Maiou leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.93 goals per game after halftime. MEAP Nisou leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
Omonia 29is Maiou's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For MEAP Nisou, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.49 goals. Both teams score in 46% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
MEAP Nisou demonstrates significantly better away and overall form compared to Omonia 29is Maiou at home. The visitors remain unbeaten on the road this season (50% wins, 50% draws) and boast an impressive +5 goal difference in away fixtures, whereas the hosts carry a negative -3 balance at home. MEAP Nisou generates an average of 1.96 xG away while conceding just 1.26 xG, highlighting their offensive superiority and solid defense. Omonia wins only 17% of home games and fails to score in 33%, which, combined with the visitors' scoring consistency (83% of matches with a goal), gives MEAP Nisou a distinct advantage. Furthermore, the visitors have averaged 2 points per game over their last five outings compared to just 1.6 for the hosts, confirming their superior current disposition.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Omonia 29is Maiou | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
MEAP Nisou is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Omonia 29is Maiou · 2 pts / game - MEAP Nisou
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Omonia 29is Maiou is 27% better for: goals scored per game.
1.64 goals / game - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.29 goals / game - MEAP Nisou
Omonia 29is Maiou is 34% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.07 goals / game - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.43 goals / game - MEAP Nisou
Omonia 29is Maiou scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 meczów), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 meczów).
MEAP Nisou scores in 79% of games (11 of 14 meczów), while Omonia 29is Maiou keeps a clean sheet in 43% (6 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Omonia 29is Maiou
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Omonia 29is Maiou is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / game - Omonia 29is Maiou · 1.29 pts / game - MEAP Nisou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Omonia 29is Maiou - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Omonia 29is Maiou
MEAP Nisou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Omonia 29is Maiou | Liga | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.71 | 2.49 | ▲ 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▲ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 43% | 32% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 67% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalAngelis Angeli
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalSteve Brahim Joshep Omar Ambri
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalSteve Brahim Joshep Omar Ambri
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalMichael da Silva Campolargo Morais
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalMárcio André Meira Fernandes
- Omonia 29is MaiouGoalReda Kharchouch
FAQ
What was the result of Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou?
The Second Division match finished Omonia 29is Maiou 7:0 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou?
Omonia 29is Maiou score 1.64 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.29. The Second Division average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Omonia 29is Maiou's matches and 57% of MEAP Nisou's.
What form are Omonia 29is Maiou and MEAP Nisou in?
Over the last 5 games Omonia 29is Maiou have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Omonia 29is Maiou vs MEAP Nisou?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.