South Africa - Premier Soccer LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Orbit College vs Golden Arrows: match statistics

Orbit College crest
Orbit College
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Golden Arrows crest
Golden Arrows

Orbit College vs Golden Arrows: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Orbit College play Golden Arrows in Premier Soccer League (South Africa). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 15:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Orbit College: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Golden Arrows: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Orbit College scores 0.70 and concedes 1.57 goals per match. Golden Arrows scores 1.13 and concedes 1.10. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Orbit College 43%, Golden Arrows 43%. Over 2.5: Orbit College 47%, Golden Arrows 43%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

xG, shots and style

Golden Arrows has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.03. Orbit College: 8.4 shots per match, Golden Arrows: 11.3.

Match halves

Orbit College: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.37. Golden Arrows: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Orbit College: 16-30 (4 goals). Golden Arrows: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Premier Soccer League: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 30%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back the away win ('2') because Golden Arrows sit 8th versus Orbit College’s 15th and display clearly superior offensive metrics: 29 goals scored this season against the hosts’ 17. In the last 5 matches Arrows have scored 5 goals, with a 3-1-1 record, averaging 2.0 points per game, while Orbit have scored 3 goals, are 1-1-3 and average only 0.8 points per game. Away, the visitors average 10.25 shots and 3.42 shots on target with 51% possession, whereas the hosts at home average 8 shots and 2.08 on target with 40% possession; xG is 1.23 for Arrows versus 1.01 for Orbit. Although Orbit concede slightly less at home (1.58 goals per game) and have 25% clean sheets compared to Arrows’ 8% on the road, the hosts fail to score more often (42% of matches without a goal vs 25% for the visitors) and have a lower conversion rate (9% vs 11%). Considering the superiority in possession, shot volume and quality, and better recent points form (2.0 vs 0.8 in the last 5), I assess probabilities as: home 25%, draw 20%, away 55%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
14Shots19
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
3Shots on target10
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
0xG0
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
4Corners5
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
0Dangerous attacks0
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
9Fouls11
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
2Cards1
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
0.7Goals scored / match1.13
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
1.57Goals conceded / match1.1
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
41%Average possession51%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
2.43Shots on target / match3.87
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.37Shots per match11.3
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
2.43Shots on target3.87
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
8.4%Shot conversion10%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
41%Possession51%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
1.03xG for1.31
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
1.64xG against1.6
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

Shooting quality

Orbit College: BalancedGolden Arrows: Balanced
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
Accuracy (shots on target)29%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Golden Arrows is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Orbit College · 1.4 pts / match - Golden Arrows

Orbit College
DWDLL
Season result split
20% W20% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-18
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -26
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-9
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.00Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Golden Arrows
DDDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
37% W27% R37% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-8-11
1.37 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-8
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 0.2xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Golden Arrows is 61% better for: goals scored per match.

0.7 goals / match - Orbit College · 1.13 goals / match - Golden Arrows

Golden Arrows is 43% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.57 goals / match - Orbit College · 1.1 goals / match - Golden Arrows

Orbit College scoring profile: mixed

Orbit College scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Golden Arrows keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

Golden Arrows scoring profile: very strong

Golden Arrows scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Orbit College keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).

21Goals scored (season)34
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
47Goals conceded (season)33
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
2.27Average goals in match2.23
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
3Goals scored (last 5)3
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
6Goals conceded (last 5)1
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal70%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
17%2 goals30%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
3%3 goals10%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
0%4 goals3%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal60%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
50%2 goals27%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
20%3 goals13%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
3%4 goals7%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

39%
League average

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time13%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
0%BTTS in both halves7%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
7%Scored in both halves20%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

BTTS and goal count

37%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
40%BTTS - last 520%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time3%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time70%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
37%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Golden Arrows is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.97 pts / match - Orbit College · 1.23 pts / match - Golden Arrows

Orbit College - half-time state
20% leading37% draw43% trailing
Golden Arrows - half-time state
23% leading53% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.97Points per match (1st half)1.23
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.43
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
0.93Average goals (1st half)0.9
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
47%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
73%No goal before half-time63%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

After half-time (2nd half)

0.73Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
0.37Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
0.97Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
1.33Average goals (2nd half)1.33
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
33%Clean sheet after half-time53%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows
70%No goal after half-time47%
Orbit CollegeGolden Arrows

Orbit College - second-half results

17% W23% R60% P
29
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-18
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.97
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Golden Arrows - second-half results

27% W50% R23% P
37
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Orbit College - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.60.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Golden Arrows - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.0
Average goals in match0.60.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%100%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Orbit College
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
4
4
16-30
4
8
31-45
4
9
46-60
4
14
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Golden Arrows
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
4
2
31-45
6
5
46-60
6
7
61-75
9
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
43%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
35%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Orbit College

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
174%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Golden Arrows

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Soccer League).

Teams vs league

Orbit CollegeLigaGolden Arrows
Average goals in match 2.272.02 2.23
Both teams scored 43%39% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%30% 43%
Clean sheets 17%37% 40%
Goal before half-time 70%60% 60%
Goal after half-time 80%70% 70%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
30%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.13
Home goals / match
0.90
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Orbit College 0 - 0 - 1 Golden Arrows. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Golden Arrows
3 : 0
Orbit College

FAQ

What was the result of Orbit College vs Golden Arrows?

The Premier Soccer League match finished Orbit College 1:2 Golden Arrows. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Orbit College vs Golden Arrows?

Orbit College score 0.70 goals per game on average and Golden Arrows 1.13. The Premier Soccer League average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Orbit College's matches and 43% of Golden Arrows's.

What form are Orbit College and Golden Arrows in?

Over the last 5 games Orbit College have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Golden Arrows 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Orbit College vs Golden Arrows?

The statistical background for Orbit College vs Golden Arrows — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.