United States - MLSInter&Co StadiumData current as of August 30, 2026

Orlando City vs Chicago Fire: match statistics

Orlando City crest
Orlando City
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Chicago Fire crest
Chicago Fire

Orlando City vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Orlando City played against Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The game was played on August 19, 2026. Venue: Inter&Co Stadium. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Orlando City has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Chicago Fire has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Orlando City scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 2.53. Chicago Fire scores 1.89 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.20 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Orlando City's games and 67% of Chicago Fire's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 78%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Chicago Fire has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.40 per game. Orlando City takes 12.2 shots per game, while Chicago Fire takes 14.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Orlando City leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Chicago Fire leads at halftime in 39% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Orlando City's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). For Chicago Fire, it is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

MLS games average 3.20 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Chicago Fire come into the match in significantly better form, having won 4 of their last 5 games and scored 10 goals in the process, while Orlando City have recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, scoring 8 goals. The visitors also look considerably stronger defensively over the course of the season: they have conceded 23 goals in 17 matches, compared with Orlando’s 47 in 18. The hosts’ advantage, however, is home-field advantage, where they win 50% of their matches and score an average of 1.88 goals, compared with Chicago’s 1.75 goals away from home. Orlando do allow opponents chances worth an average xG of 1.94, clearly above the 1.59 recorded by Chicago away from home, which increases the in-form visitors’ chances of taking control of the match. Both teams concede an average of 1.63 goals at home and away respectively, so an open game should be expected, although current form gives Chicago a slight edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is supported by the high efficiency of both attacks: Orlando City score an average of 2.00 goals at home, while Chicago Fire average 1.75 goals away. Chicago concede an average of 1.63 goals per match, while Orlando generate 1.85 xG at home and register 5.56 shots on target, making a home goal highly likely. The visitors also have strong arguments to score, as Orlando concede an average of 1.11 goals, while their average goals conceded has risen to 1.60 over their last five matches, with 1.64 xG against. Both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, while across the season Chicago’s rate stands at 75%, compared with 56% for Orlando and a league average of 61%. Additionally, Chicago have scored 10 goals in their last five appearances, while Orlando have conceded 8 during that period, further strengthening the scenario of a goal for each side.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have very high season rates of matches featuring at least 2 goals: 78% for Orlando City and 88% for Chicago Fire. Orlando creates chances worth an average of 1.85 xG per match, while Chicago allows opponents 1.59 xG, supporting the forecast of at least one or two goals for the hosts. The visitors score an average of 1.75 goals, while Orlando concedes 1.11 goals per match, so their contribution to the total is also realistic. In their last 5 matches, both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals and Both Teams to Score in 80% of cases, with their combined average of goals scored standing at 3.6 per match. However, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as it combines a high level of agreement across the season data with an expected total of 2.98 goals and leaves a clear safety margin.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Orlando City has a clearly stronger home profile: they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.11 conceded at home, while Chicago Fire allow opponents an average of 1.63 goals per away match. Orlando’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created, with an average xG of 1.85 compared with Chicago’s 1.36, while their shots on target average 5.56 versus 4.63 for the visitors. The hosts led at the break in 3 of 9 matches, but the score was level after 45 minutes in 5 of 9, making a draw at half-time followed by an Orlando win a close alternative. After the break, Orlando score an average of 1.22 goals, while Chicago concede 0.75 away goals, further strengthening the hosts’ chances of settling the match in their favor. However, Chicago are on a strong run of four consecutive victories and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, meaning the 1/1 pick holds only a moderate, rather than dominant, edge over the X/1 variant.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
Orlando CityChicago Fire
16Shots7
Orlando CityChicago Fire
5Shots on target3
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.75xG0.86
Orlando CityChicago Fire
3Corners3
Orlando CityChicago Fire
55Dangerous attacks28
Orlando CityChicago Fire
15Fouls11
Orlando CityChicago Fire
2Cards2
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.63Goals scored / game1.89
Orlando CityChicago Fire
2.53Goals allowed / game1.33
Orlando CityChicago Fire
46%Average possession52%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
4.95Shots on target / game5.06
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.21Shots per game14.11
Orlando CityChicago Fire
4.95Shots on target5.06
Orlando CityChicago Fire
13.4%Shot conversion13.4%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
46%Possession52%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.4xG for1.58
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.97xG against1.38
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Shooting quality

Orlando City: Counter-attackingChicago Fire: Attacking
Orlando CityChicago Fire
Accuracy (shots on target)41%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Chicago Fire is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / game - Orlando City · 1.8 pts / game - Chicago Fire

Orlando City
LWWLD
Season result split
32% W16% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-10
1.11 pts / game · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Chicago Fire
WLLWW
Season result split
56% W11% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-6
1.78 pts / game · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-3
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DWWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Chicago Fire is 16% better for: goals scored per game.

1.63 goals / game - Orlando City · 1.89 goals / game - Chicago Fire

Chicago Fire is 90% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.53 goals / game - Orlando City · 1.33 goals / game - Chicago Fire

Orlando City scoring profile: strong

Orlando City scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).

Chicago Fire scoring profile: very strong

Chicago Fire scores in 94% of games (17 of 18 meczów), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 meczów).

31Goals scored (season)34
Orlando CityChicago Fire
48Goals conceded (season)24
Orlando CityChicago Fire
4.16Average goals per game3.22
Orlando CityChicago Fire
10Goals scored (last 5)9
Orlando CityChicago Fire
10Goals conceded (last 5)9
Orlando CityChicago Fire

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal94%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
47%2 goals61%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
21%3 goals22%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
21%4 goals6%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal67%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
58%2 goals39%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
47%3 goals28%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
26%4 goals0%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

62%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time39%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
5%BTTS in both halves11%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
26%Scored in both halves39%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
21%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
60%BTTS - last 5100%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

84%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
63%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
26%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
42%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chicago Fire is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.16 pts / game - Orlando City · 1.61 pts / game - Chicago Fire

Orlando City - half-time state
32% leading21% draw47% trailing
Chicago Fire - half-time state
39% leading44% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.16Points per game (1st half)1.61
Orlando CityChicago Fire
0.68Goals scored (1st half)0.89
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.21Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.89Average goals (1st half)1.56
Orlando CityChicago Fire
42%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
53%No goal before half-time28%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per game (2nd half)1.39
Orlando CityChicago Fire
0.95Goals scored (2nd half)1
Orlando CityChicago Fire
1.32Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Orlando CityChicago Fire
2.26Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Orlando CityChicago Fire
37%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Orlando CityChicago Fire
47%No goal after half-time39%
Orlando CityChicago Fire

Orlando City - second-half results

37% W11% R53% P
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.16
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Chicago Fire - second-half results

39% W22% R39% P
29
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding144%

Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Orlando City - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.40
Goals scored / game0.61.4
Goals allowed / game1.01.0
Average goals per game1.62.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Chicago Fire - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game1.20.6
Goals allowed / game1.20.6
Average goals per game2.41.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal0%40%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Orlando City
ScoredConceded
2
5
0-15
9
9
16-30
2
9
31-45
6
9
46-60
7
4
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Chicago Fire
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
8
4
16-30
3
7
31-45
3
2
46-60
8
1
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.69
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 2.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Orlando City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
189%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Chicago Fire

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
141%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).

Teams vs league

Orlando CityLigaChicago Fire
Average goals per game 4.163.20 3.22
Both teams scored 63%62% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%61% 78%
Clean sheets 11%21% 33%
Goal before half-time 84%76% 83%
Goal after half-time 95%81% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.20
Average goals per game
62%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.86
Home goals / game
1.34
Away goals / game
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defensive advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
51%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Chicago FireGoalPuso DithejaneAssist: David Poręba
  2. Orlando CityGoalDavid BrekaloAssist: Antoine Griezmann
  3. Orlando CityYellow cardLuis Otávio Costa de Aquino
  4. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Daryl DikeOff: Justin Ellis
  5. Orlando CityYellow cardRobin Jansson
  6. Chicago FireGoalRobert Lewandowski
  7. Orlando CitySubstitutionOn: Eduard Andrés Atuesta VelascoOff: Griffin Dorsey
  8. Chicago FireYellow cardViktor Radojević
  9. Chicago FireSubstitutionOn: Samual RogersOff: Robert Lewandowski
  10. Chicago FireYellow cardSamual Rogers

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?

The MLS match finished Orlando City 1:2 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?

Orlando City score 1.63 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.89. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Orlando City's matches and 67% of Chicago Fire's.

What form are Orlando City and Chicago Fire in?

Over the last 5 games Orlando City have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chicago Fire 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.