Orlando City vs Chicago Fire: match statistics
Orlando City vs Chicago Fire: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Orlando City played against Chicago Fire in MLS (United States). The game was played on August 19, 2026. Venue: Inter&Co Stadium. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Orlando City has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Chicago Fire has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Orlando City scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 2.53. Chicago Fire scores 1.89 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 3.20 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 63% of Orlando City's games and 67% of Chicago Fire's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 78%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Chicago Fire has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.40 per game. Orlando City takes 12.2 shots per game, while Chicago Fire takes 14.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Orlando City leads at halftime in 32% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Chicago Fire leads at halftime in 39% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Orlando City's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (9 goals). For Chicago Fire, it is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.20 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Chicago Fire come into the match in significantly better form, having won 4 of their last 5 games and scored 10 goals in the process, while Orlando City have recorded 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, scoring 8 goals. The visitors also look considerably stronger defensively over the course of the season: they have conceded 23 goals in 17 matches, compared with Orlando’s 47 in 18. The hosts’ advantage, however, is home-field advantage, where they win 50% of their matches and score an average of 1.88 goals, compared with Chicago’s 1.75 goals away from home. Orlando do allow opponents chances worth an average xG of 1.94, clearly above the 1.59 recorded by Chicago away from home, which increases the in-form visitors’ chances of taking control of the match. Both teams concede an average of 1.63 goals at home and away respectively, so an open game should be expected, although current form gives Chicago a slight edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - Yes is supported by the high efficiency of both attacks: Orlando City score an average of 2.00 goals at home, while Chicago Fire average 1.75 goals away. Chicago concede an average of 1.63 goals per match, while Orlando generate 1.85 xG at home and register 5.56 shots on target, making a home goal highly likely. The visitors also have strong arguments to score, as Orlando concede an average of 1.11 goals, while their average goals conceded has risen to 1.60 over their last five matches, with 1.64 xG against. Both teams recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, while across the season Chicago’s rate stands at 75%, compared with 56% for Orlando and a league average of 61%. Additionally, Chicago have scored 10 goals in their last five appearances, while Orlando have conceded 8 during that period, further strengthening the scenario of a goal for each side.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have very high season rates of matches featuring at least 2 goals: 78% for Orlando City and 88% for Chicago Fire. Orlando creates chances worth an average of 1.85 xG per match, while Chicago allows opponents 1.59 xG, supporting the forecast of at least one or two goals for the hosts. The visitors score an average of 1.75 goals, while Orlando concedes 1.11 goals per match, so their contribution to the total is also realistic. In their last 5 matches, both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals and Both Teams to Score in 80% of cases, with their combined average of goals scored standing at 3.6 per match. However, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as it combines a high level of agreement across the season data with an expected total of 2.98 goals and leaves a clear safety margin.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Orlando City has a clearly stronger home profile: they average 2.00 goals scored and 1.11 conceded at home, while Chicago Fire allow opponents an average of 1.63 goals per away match. Orlando’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created, with an average xG of 1.85 compared with Chicago’s 1.36, while their shots on target average 5.56 versus 4.63 for the visitors. The hosts led at the break in 3 of 9 matches, but the score was level after 45 minutes in 5 of 9, making a draw at half-time followed by an Orlando win a close alternative. After the break, Orlando score an average of 1.22 goals, while Chicago concede 0.75 away goals, further strengthening the hosts’ chances of settling the match in their favor. However, Chicago are on a strong run of four consecutive victories and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, meaning the 1/1 pick holds only a moderate, rather than dominant, edge over the X/1 variant.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Orlando City | Chicago Fire | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Chicago Fire is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Orlando City · 1.8 pts / game - Chicago Fire
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chicago Fire is 16% better for: goals scored per game.
1.63 goals / game - Orlando City · 1.89 goals / game - Chicago Fire
Chicago Fire is 90% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.53 goals / game - Orlando City · 1.33 goals / game - Chicago Fire
Orlando City scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while Chicago Fire keeps a clean sheet in 33% (6 of 18 meczów).
Chicago Fire scores in 94% of games (17 of 18 meczów), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Orlando City
Over / Under - Chicago Fire
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Chicago Fire is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.16 pts / game - Orlando City · 1.61 pts / game - Chicago Fire
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Orlando City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Chicago Fire - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 39% of games and wins 56%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 2.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Orlando City
Chicago Fire
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Orlando City | Liga | Chicago Fire | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.16 | 3.20 | • 3.22 |
| Both teams scored | • 63% | 62% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 61% | ▲ 78% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 21% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 76% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 81% | ▼ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?
The MLS match finished Orlando City 1:2 Chicago Fire. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?
Orlando City score 1.63 goals per game on average and Chicago Fire 1.89. The MLS average is 3.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Orlando City's matches and 67% of Chicago Fire's.
What form are Orlando City and Chicago Fire in?
Over the last 5 games Orlando City have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Chicago Fire 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Orlando City vs Chicago Fire?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


