Orlando City vs Houston Dynamo: match statistics
Orlando City vs Houston Dynamo: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Orlando City played against Houston Dynamo in MLS (United States). The game was played on April 18, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Orlando City has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Houston Dynamo has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Orlando City scores 0.86 goals per game and allows 3.43. Houston Dynamo scores 1.67 and allows 2.67. Games in this league average 3.16 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Orlando City's games and 67% of Houston Dynamo's. The Over 2.5 rates are 86% and 67%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Houston Dynamo has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.11 per game. Orlando City takes 10.3 shots per game, while Houston Dynamo takes 14.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Orlando City leads at halftime in 43% of its games and scores 0.14 goals per game after halftime. Houston Dynamo leads at halftime in 17% and scores 1.17 after halftime.
When the teams score
Orlando City's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Houston Dynamo, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.16 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (2): Houston have scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches versus just 4 for Orlando, and on the road they average 2.5 goals compared to the hosts’ 1.67 at home. The visitors also display higher efficiency – 17% conversion versus 12% – and average 6 shots on target per match versus Orlando’s 5.67, translating into better quality chances. Both sides are defensively vulnerable: Orlando concedes 2.33 goals at home on average, while Houston concedes as many as 5.0 on the road, and neither team has kept a clean sheet yet. xG also slightly favors Houston (1.69 xG vs 1.45 xG) with a lower xG against (1.82 vs 2.08), although the hosts have a marginally better points average in the last 5 matches (1.4 vs 1.2). Considering the visitors’ offensive edge and greater efficiency, I expect Houston to take the win, but the match should be open and high-scoring.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams give a strong signal for BTTS - Yes: Houston has BTTS 100% for the season and 80% in the last 5 matches, Orlando 50% for the season and 40% in the last 5. Both sides practically never record clean sheets (0% seasonally for both) and in the last 5 matches they concede on average 2.6 (Orlando) and 2.8 goals (Houston), which increases the risk of goals at both ends. In terms of xG both sides create chances: Orlando has an attacking xG of 1.50 versus Houston’s 1.69, while xG against is 1.47 (Orlando) and 1.82 (Houston), so Houston generates and concedes slightly more expected chances. Additionally Houston scores on average 2.5 goals this season versus 1.25 for Orlando and has a conversion rate of 17% versus Orlando’s 9%, and the league averages 3.1 goals with over2.5 and BTTS stats at 50%/100% (Orlando/Houston), therefore I assess the probability of BTTS at about 80%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model projects 1.66 goals for Orlando and 1.58 for Houston, totaling 3.24 expected goals in the match. Seasonal trends show Orlando had Over 2.5 in 50% of games, while Houston had Over 2.5 in 100% of away matches; in the last 5 fixtures Over 2.5 occurred in 60% for Orlando and 80% for Houston. Houston averages 6.0 shots on target with a 17% conversion rate, Orlando 4.0 shots on target with a 9% conversion, which increases the likelihood of goals at both ends. Additionally, Orlando concedes 1.5 goals per game on average and Houston concedes 5.0 on the road according to seasonal data, which supports a higher-scoring scenario. Based on this, I recommend a bet on Over 2.5 as the strongest signal (≈80% probability), with Over 1.5 very likely (~95%), while Over 3.5 remains riskier (~40%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time the strongest signal points to the away side leading: Houston led at the break in 50% of matches and averages 1.5 goals by half-time, whereas Orlando averages 0.0 goals at the interval. By full-time the metrics favor the home side — Orlando have a 50% win rate this season and average 1.5 points per match, while Houston have a 0% win rate and 0.0 points per match. Additionally Orlando score an average of 1.25 goals after the break, and Houston concede an average of 3.0 goals in the second half; the hosts have netted 2 goals in minutes 61–75 and 3 goals in 76–90, indicating frequent late goals. Although xG are similar (1.5 versus 1.69), Houston display a higher shot conversion rate of 17% versus Orlando’s 9%, which explains more frequent leads at the break but does not translate into victories. For these reasons the most likely scenario is Houston leading at half-time and Orlando winning by the final whistle (HT/FT = 2/1), with an alternative of a draw at half-time and a home win (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Orlando City | Houston Dynamo | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.23 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Orlando City is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / game - Orlando City · 0.6 pts / game - Houston Dynamo
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Houston Dynamo is 94% better for: goals scored per game.
0.86 goals / game - Orlando City · 1.67 goals / game - Houston Dynamo
Houston Dynamo is 28% better for: goals allowed per game.
3.43 goals / game - Orlando City · 2.67 goals / game - Houston Dynamo
Orlando City scores in 57% of games (4 of 7 meczów), while Houston Dynamo keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 meczów).
Houston Dynamo scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while Orlando City keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Orlando City
Over / Under - Houston Dynamo
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Orlando City is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.29 pts / game - Orlando City · 0.83 pts / game - Houston Dynamo
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Orlando City - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 43% of games and wins 14%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Houston Dynamo - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 2.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -8 | -7 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Orlando City
Houston Dynamo
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| Orlando City | Liga | Houston Dynamo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.29 | 3.16 | ▲ 4.33 |
| Both teams scored | • 57% | 57% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 64% | ▲ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 24% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 75% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 81% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Houston DynamoYellow cardJimmy Maurer
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
FAQ
What was the result of Orlando City vs Houston Dynamo?
The MLS match finished Orlando City 0:1 Houston Dynamo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Orlando City vs Houston Dynamo?
Orlando City score 0.86 goals per game on average and Houston Dynamo 1.67. The MLS average is 3.16 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Orlando City's matches and 67% of Houston Dynamo's.
What form are Orlando City and Houston Dynamo in?
Over the last 5 games Orlando City have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Houston Dynamo 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Orlando City vs Houston Dynamo?
The statistical background for Orlando City vs Houston Dynamo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


