Osijek vs Dinamo Zagreb: match statistics
Osijek vs Dinamo Zagreb: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Osijek played against Dinamo Zagreb in Prva HNL (Croatia). The game was played on September 12, 2026. Venue: Stadion Gradski vrt. Final score: 4:2.
Recent form
Osijek has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Dinamo Zagreb has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Osijek scores 2.17 goals per game and allows 1.50. Dinamo Zagreb scores 2.40 and allows 0.60. Games in this league average 3.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Osijek's games and 40% of Dinamo Zagreb's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 60%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 66% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Dinamo Zagreb has the higher season xG average, 2.48 to 2.02 per game. Osijek takes 18.8 shots per game, while Dinamo Zagreb takes 21.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Osijek leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Dinamo Zagreb leads at halftime in 60% and scores 1.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Osijek's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (5 goals). For Dinamo Zagreb, it is minutes 61-75 (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Prva HNL games average 3.17 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 66% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 4 away wins. Those games averaged 3.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Osijek have posted very strong home numbers: they have won both of their matches so far, averaging 2 goals scored and none conceded, while their average xG stands at a high 2.47. The hosts are also creating more chances, averaging 22.5 shots per match compared with Dinamo’s 20, including 5 shots on target. Dinamo Zagreb remain unbeaten throughout the season, but recorded a draw away from home, concede an average of 2 goals on the road and have yet to keep a clean sheet. The visitors boast a solid xG against figure of 0.79 and 71% possession; however, Osijek have won 3 of their last 5 matches and should make better use of their clear home advantage. A closely contested match is expected, but Osijek’s greater consistency at home points to a narrow victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is primarily driven by Dinamo’s outstanding performance in this market: both teams scored in 100% of their matches this season and in 80% of their last five games. Osijek average 2.5 goals at home, with an xG of 2.56 and 9.5 shots on target per match, while Dinamo have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away appearance. The visitors also possess the attacking potential to score, averaging 2.0 goals, generating an xG of 2.16, and scoring 1.8 goals per game across their last five matches. The risk to the pick is Osijek’s defense, which concedes just 0.25 goals at home and has a 75% clean-sheet rate, although their recent run points to declining stability, with an average of 1.8 goals conceded and an xG against of 1.63. The current attacking-strength advantage and Dinamo’s vulnerability to conceding slightly favor a scenario in which both sides find the net.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
In their matches so far, Osijek have averaged 2.5 goals scored at home and created chances worth 2.56 xG, while Dinamo have averaged 2.0 goals scored away from home. In their last five matches, both teams recorded Over 2.5 goals in 80% of cases, with a combined record of 20 goals scored and 17 conceded. Dinamo have gone Over 1.5 goals in all of their away matches so far, while Osijek have surpassed this line in 75% of their home fixtures. Osijek’s defensive stability over the course of the season, with an average of 0.25 goals conceded at home, slightly reduces the likelihood of a very high-scoring game; however, in their last five matches, the team conceded 1.8 goals per game. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 3.00 goals provides a wide margin of safety against this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Osijek have won all of their home matches so far, scoring an average of 2.5 goals and conceding just 0.25, while Dinamo have failed to win any away fixture, drawing in 100% of cases. The hosts held a lead at the break in 3 of 4 home matches, whereas Dinamo were trailing at half-time in their only away appearance, having conceded an average of 2 goals before the interval. Osijek’s advantage is also evident in their creation of clear-cut chances: their average xG is 2.56, and they register 9.5 shots on target per match compared with Dinamo’s 3.0. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 75% of their matches, while the visitors have yet to record one. After the break, Osijek add an average of 1.5 goals without conceding, further supporting the HT/FT scenario of Osijek leading at half-time and securing the final victory (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Osijek | Dinamo Zagreb | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Dinamo Zagreb is 44% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Osijek · 2.6 pts / game - Dinamo Zagreb
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Dinamo Zagreb is 11% better for: goals scored per game.
2.17 goals / game - Osijek · 2.4 goals / game - Dinamo Zagreb
Dinamo Zagreb is 150% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.5 goals / game - Osijek · 0.6 goals / game - Dinamo Zagreb
Osijek scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Dinamo Zagreb keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).
Dinamo Zagreb scores in 100% of games (5 of 5 meczów), while Osijek keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Osijek
Over / Under - Dinamo Zagreb
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Dinamo Zagreb is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - Osijek · 1.8 pts / game - Dinamo Zagreb
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Osijek - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Dinamo Zagreb - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 60% of games and wins 80%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +7 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Osijek
Dinamo Zagreb
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Prva HNL).
Teams vs league
| Osijek | Liga | Dinamo Zagreb | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.67 | 3.17 | ▼ 3.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 48% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 67% | 66% | ▼ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 29% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 79% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 79% | • 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Osijek's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses against Dinamo Zagreb. Games average 3.75 goals, and both teams scored in 25% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Osijek vs Dinamo Zagreb?
The Prva HNL match finished Osijek 4:2 Dinamo Zagreb. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Osijek and Dinamo Zagreb?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Osijek won 0, Dinamo Zagreb won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Osijek vs Dinamo Zagreb?
Osijek score 2.17 goals per game on average and Dinamo Zagreb 2.40. The Prva HNL average is 3.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Osijek's matches and 40% of Dinamo Zagreb's.
What form are Osijek and Dinamo Zagreb in?
Over the last 5 games Osijek have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Dinamo Zagreb 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Osijek vs Dinamo Zagreb?
The statistical background for Osijek vs Dinamo Zagreb — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


