Osnabrück vs Energie Cottbus: match statistics
Osnabrück vs Energie Cottbus: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Osnabrück played against Energie Cottbus in 3. Liga (Germany). The game was played on April 12, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Osnabrück has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Energie Cottbus has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Osnabrück scores 1.69 goals per game and allows 0.84. Energie Cottbus scores 1.91 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 3.13 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Osnabrück's games and 69% of Energie Cottbus's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 72%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Energie Cottbus has the higher season xG average, 1.70 to 1.59 per game. Osnabrück takes 13.1 shots per game, while Energie Cottbus takes 13.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Osnabrück leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 1.06 goals per game after halftime. Energie Cottbus leads at halftime in 44% and scores 1.06 after halftime.
When the teams score
Osnabrück's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Energie Cottbus, it is minutes 61-75 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3. Liga games average 3.13 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (Osnabrück). At home Osnabrück concedes only 0.63 goals per match on average and records 63% clean sheets, whereas Energie Cottbus concede 1.53 goals on average as visitors and have 27% clean sheets, which gives a clear defensive edge to the hosts. The visitors’ strength is offensive efficiency: Energie scored 61 goals this season, averages 1.71 xG away and 6.27 shots on target per match, and have only 13% of matches without a goal, while Osnabrück at home score 1.56 goals and have 1.61 xG. In the last 5 matches Osnabrück are 2-1-2 (avg. 1.4 pts/match), and Energie are 2-2-1 in their last 5 (avg. 1.6 pts/match), giving the visitors a slight form advantage. Considering Osnabrück’s better protection of their own goal combined with the visitors’ consistent scoring, I assess the probabilities as: home win 55%, draw 25%, away win 20%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS is the seasonal indicators for both teams: Osnabrück has BTTS at 71%, Energie Cottbus 67%, and the league average is 64%. Both teams show similar attacking potential (xG 1.69 vs 1.71) and convert it into goals (goals per game 2.12 vs 1.67), supported by shots on target 5.18 vs 6.27 and conversion rate 15% vs 12%. Additionally, the league is high-scoring (avg 3.12 goals per match), with over 2.5 goals occurring in 65% of home matches and 80% of away matches; the combination of over 2.5 goals and BTTS stands at 53% for home teams and 60% for away teams. A counterpoint is the drop in BTTS in the last 5 matches (20% for the home side, 40% for the away side), however in those five matches the home team averaged 1.4 scored and 1.0 conceded, and the away team 1.6 scored and 1.0 conceded, which still indicates both sides’ ability to score. Considering the strong seasonal BTTS rates (71%/67%) and xG 1.69/1.71, I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 70% versus 30% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Statistics indicate clear goal potential: home xG 1.69 and xG against visitors 1.50 give Osnabrück ≈1.60 expected goals, while visitors’ xG 1.71 and xG against home 1.43 give Cottbus ≈1.57, total ≈3.17. Season Over 1.5 rates are 82% for Osnabrück and 93% for Cottbus (average 87.5%), providing a very strong signal for Over 1.5 (I estimate ~90%). Over 2.5 also has solid backing: seasonally 65% (home) vs 80% (away), average ~72.5%, so I assess the chance of Over 2.5 at ~73%. Over 3.5 is less certain (47% vs 33%, average ~40%), despite seasonal goal totals of 54 (Osnabrück) and 61 (Cottbus). Additionally BTTS are 71% and 67%, and the Over 2.5 + BTTS combination occurs in 53%/60% of matches, therefore the strongest and most probable line to play is OVER 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Osnabrück led at half-time in 10 matches, representing 59% of their home appearances, and score an average of 1.12 goals by the break versus 0.53 for Energie Cottbus, which clearly favors the hosts in the first half. Over the full 90 minutes the hosts average 2.12 goals with an xG of 1.69, while the visitors record 1.67 goals and an xG of 1.71; similar xG but higher finishing efficiency for the hosts (conversion 15% vs 12%) suggests Osnabrück converts chances into goals more frequently. By half-time the hosts accumulated 34 points (an average of 2.0 points per game at the break) versus 20 points (1.33 points per game at the break) for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches the hosts led at the break in 75% of cases (about 4 out of 5), increasing the probability of them holding a lead after the first 45 minutes. Considering these figures and the fact that the visitors led at the break in only 4 matches (27%), the strongest signal points to the hosts leading at half-time and winning the match (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Osnabrück | Energie Cottbus | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Osnabrück is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Osnabrück · 1.6 pts / game - Energie Cottbus
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Energie Cottbus is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.69 goals / game - Osnabrück · 1.91 goals / game - Energie Cottbus
Osnabrück is 64% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.84 goals / game - Osnabrück · 1.38 goals / game - Energie Cottbus
Osnabrück scores in 78% of games (25 of 32 meczów), while Energie Cottbus keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 meczów).
Energie Cottbus scores in 84% of games (27 of 32 meczów), while Osnabrück keeps a clean sheet in 53% (17 of 32 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Osnabrück
Over / Under - Energie Cottbus
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Osnabrück - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 59%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Energie Cottbus - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.40 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Osnabrück
Energie Cottbus
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).
Teams vs league
| Osnabrück | Liga | Energie Cottbus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.53 | 3.13 | ▲ 3.28 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 64% | ▲ 69% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 63% | ▲ 72% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 53% | 21% | ▲ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 77% | ▼ 72% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 83% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Osnabrück's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Energie Cottbus. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Osnabrück vs Energie Cottbus?
The 3. Liga match finished Osnabrück 1:0 Energie Cottbus. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Osnabrück vs Energie Cottbus?
Osnabrück score 1.69 goals per game on average and Energie Cottbus 1.91. The 3. Liga average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Osnabrück's matches and 69% of Energie Cottbus's.
What form are Osnabrück and Energie Cottbus in?
Over the last 5 games Osnabrück have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Energie Cottbus 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Osnabrück vs Energie Cottbus?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Osnabrück vs Energie Cottbus: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


