Oss vs Utrecht II: match statistics
Oss vs Utrecht II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Oss played against Utrecht II in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The game was played on April 6, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Oss has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Utrecht II has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Oss scores 1.26 goals per game and allows 1.76. Utrecht II scores 1.55 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Oss's games and 64% of Utrecht II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 59% and 61%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 64% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Utrecht II has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.37 per game. Oss takes 11.8 shots per game, while Utrecht II takes 13.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Oss leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Utrecht II leads at halftime in 30% and scores 0.94 after halftime.
When the teams score
Oss's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For Utrecht II, it is minutes 46-60 (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eerste Divisie games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 64% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Oss has the edge in recent attacking form — 8 goals in their last 5 matches (record 1-2-2), while Utrecht II have scored just 4 goals in their last five (record 2-0-3). At home Oss averages 1.41 goals per game and fail to score in only 24% of home outings, whereas Utrecht II average 1.06 goals per away match and fail to score in 44% of road games, which supports greater attacking reliability for the hosts. The visitors, however, have strong season-long arguments: 51 goals this season versus Oss’s 43, a higher average of shots on target per away match (4.69 vs 3.53) and a superior league position (14th vs 20th). Both defenses underperform — Oss concedes 1.82 goals at home on average, Utrecht concedes 1.56 away, and xG is almost even (home xG 1.41 vs away xG 1.42), so I expect a balanced but high-scoring contest. Given Oss’s better home efficiency (conversion 11% and FTS 24% vs 9% and 44% for Utrecht) I give a slight preference to the hosts and forecast a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes. Oss finishes seasonal matches with both teams scoring in 76% of games, averaging 2.0 goals scored and 1.76 conceded per match, while Utrecht II has a seasonal BTTS of 50% and averages 1.06 scored and 1.56 conceded per game. xG indicates both sides have scoring potential — expected xG around 1.63 for Oss (1.74 and 1.52) and 1.50 for Utrecht II (1.42 and 1.58). Additionally, Oss averages 6.18 shots on target versus 4.69 for the visitors, has a conversion rate of 13% vs 9% and recorded BTTS in 100% of their last 5 matches, whereas the visitors have only 6% clean sheets and averaged 0.8 goals in their last 5 matches (20% BTTS). Overall, considering seasonal BTTS 76% vs 50%, the league average BTTS 62% and the xG and shots data, I assign 72% to YES and 28% to No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Oss averages 2.00 goals per home game, Utrecht II scores 1.06 goals away; their xG are 1.74 (Oss) and 1.42 (Utrecht II). Averaging offensive xG with the typical xG conceded by opponents (for Oss: 1.74 and 1.52; for Utrecht II: 1.42 and 1.58) yields expected goals of 1.63 for Oss and 1.50 for Utrecht II, totalling ≈3.13 goals. A Poisson model with λ=3.13 gives probabilities of Over 1.5 ≈82%, Over 2.5 ≈61% and Over 3.5 ≈38%. Additionally, Oss averages 6.18 shots on target at home versus 4.69 for visitors and has conversion rates of 13% vs 9%, and seasonally records 82% of matches over 1.5 and 71% over 2.5, which strengthens the goals signal. Therefore I recommend an Over 1.5 (over) bet as the strongest signal: 82% probability, supported by combined xG 3.13 and the home advantage in shots and efficiency.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal statistics clearly favor Oss: the home side averages 2.0 goals per game versus 1.06 for Utrecht II, has more points per game (1.53 vs 0.81), higher xG (1.74 vs 1.42) and more shots on target (6.18 vs 4.69). At Half-Time Oss have led in 41% of matches (7 instances) compared to 19% (3) for Utrecht II; the hosts average 0.94 goals by the break vs 0.25 for the visitors and have 30 first-half goals against 13, so the strongest signal is Oss taking a lead at the break. Over Full-Time the home advantage persists: average goals 2.0 vs 1.06, shot conversion 13% vs 9% and only 6% of Utrecht II matches without conceding, which increases the probability of an Oss victory. However, one must account for the hosts’ last five matches — in those five Oss recorded 0% leads at Half-Time and were losing at the break in 60% of cases, while Utrecht II had 20% Half-Time leads and averaged 1.2 points at the break, which reduces confidence in the advantage at 45 minutes. Overall the strongest and most consistent signal from the data is the 1/1 scenario (Oss leading at Half-Time and winning after 90 minutes).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Oss | Utrecht II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Utrecht II is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Oss · 1.2 pts / game - Utrecht II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Utrecht II is 23% better for: goals scored per game.
1.26 goals / game - Oss · 1.55 goals / game - Utrecht II
Utrecht II is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.76 goals / game - Oss · 1.67 goals / game - Utrecht II
Oss scores in 74% of games (25 of 34 meczów), while Utrecht II keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 33 meczów).
Utrecht II scores in 73% of games (24 of 33 meczów), while Oss keeps a clean sheet in 18% (6 of 34 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Oss
Over / Under - Utrecht II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Oss - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 21%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Utrecht II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -5 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Oss
Utrecht II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).
Teams vs league
| Oss | Liga | Utrecht II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.03 | 3.21 | • 3.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 62% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 59% | 64% | ▼ 61% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 21% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 78% | ▼ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 82% | 85% | ▲ 88% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Oss's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Utrecht II. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Oss vs Utrecht II?
The Eerste Divisie match finished Oss 3:1 Utrecht II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Oss vs Utrecht II?
Oss score 1.26 goals per game on average and Utrecht II 1.55. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 64% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Oss's matches and 64% of Utrecht II's.
What form are Oss and Utrecht II in?
Over the last 5 games Oss have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Utrecht II 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Oss vs Utrecht II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


