Canada - Canadian Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC: match statistics

Pacific FC crest
Pacific FC
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Cavalry FC crest
Cavalry FC

Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pacific FC play Cavalry FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match date is 6 April 2026 at 00:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Pacific FC: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Cavalry FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pacific FC scores 1.08 and concedes 2.25 goals per match. Cavalry FC scores 1.92 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.90 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pacific FC 75%, Cavalry FC 42%. Over 2.5: Pacific FC 75%, Cavalry FC 42%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Cavalry FC has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.18. Pacific FC: 9.8 shots per match, Cavalry FC: 15.0.

Match halves

Pacific FC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67. Cavalry FC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.17.

Goals by minute

Pacific FC: 31-45+ (3 goals). Cavalry FC: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Canadian Premier League: 2.90 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

5 H2H matches: 1-1-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 20%.

Match description

Cavalry FC are the favorites for this match: they sit 2nd in the table while Pacific FC are 5th. In the last 5 matches Cavalry have scored 9 goals (1.8 per game), whereas Pacific have scored 6 (1.2 per game). The defensive gap is even more pronounced: Pacific have conceded 16 goals in those 5 games (3.2 per game), while Cavalry only 6 (1.2 per game). This is reflected in points and results — Pacific average just 0.4 points per game in the last 5 with 0 wins in that run, and Cavalry average 1.6 points per game with 2 wins (record 2-2-1). Given Pacific’s poorer defense and Cavalry’s clearly superior points and goal metrics, I back the visitors as favorites for this match.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Pacific FCCavalry FC
13Shots16
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1Shots on target7
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1.13xG1.77
Pacific FCCavalry FC
5Corners3
Pacific FCCavalry FC
34Dangerous attacks38
Pacific FCCavalry FC
14Fouls18
Pacific FCCavalry FC
4Cards3
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pacific FCCavalry FC
1.08Goals scored / match1.92
Pacific FCCavalry FC
2.25Goals conceded / match0.5
Pacific FCCavalry FC
51%Average possession50%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
3.25Shots on target / match5.5
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.83Shots per match15
Pacific FCCavalry FC
3.25Shots on target5.5
Pacific FCCavalry FC
11%Shot conversion12.8%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
51%Possession50%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1.18xG for1.69
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1.7xG against1.13
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Shooting quality

Pacific FC: BalancedCavalry FC: Attacking
Pacific FCCavalry FC
Accuracy (shots on target)33%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Cavalry FC is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Pacific FC · 2 pts / match - Cavalry FC

Pacific FC
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W25% R75% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-9
0.25 pts / match · goal difference -14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-6
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Cavalry FC
LWWWD
Season result split
67% W25% R8% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-1
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 away
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 0.97BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Cavalry FC is 78% better for: goals scored per match.

1.08 goals / match - Pacific FC · 1.92 goals / match - Cavalry FC

Cavalry FC is 350% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.25 goals / match - Pacific FC · 0.5 goals / match - Cavalry FC

Pacific FC scoring profile: strong

Pacific FC scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).

Cavalry FC scoring profile: very strong

Cavalry FC scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Pacific FC keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 12 matches).

13Goals scored (season)23
Pacific FCCavalry FC
27Goals conceded (season)6
Pacific FCCavalry FC
3.33Average goals in match2.42
Pacific FCCavalry FC
7Goals scored (last 5)11
Pacific FCCavalry FC
12Goals conceded (last 5)3
Pacific FCCavalry FC

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal83%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
33%2 goals58%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0%3 goals33%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0%4 goals8%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
75%2 goals0%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
33%3 goals0%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
8%4 goals0%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

8%BTTS at half-time8%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
25%Scored in both halves25%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
100%BTTS - last 540%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time42%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
8%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Cavalry FC is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Pacific FC · 1.67 pts / match - Cavalry FC

Pacific FC - half-time state
33% leading25% draw42% trailing
Cavalry FC - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.67
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0.42Goals scored (1st half)0.75
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.08
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0.92Average goals (1st half)0.83
Pacific FCCavalry FC
58%Clean sheet before half-time92%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
58%No goal before half-time58%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

After half-time (2nd half)

0.25Points per match (2nd half)1.75
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)1.17
Pacific FCCavalry FC
1.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Pacific FCCavalry FC
2.42Average goals (2nd half)1.58
Pacific FCCavalry FC
0%Clean sheet after half-time58%
Pacific FCCavalry FC
42%No goal after half-time33%
Pacific FCCavalry FC

Pacific FC - second-half results

0% W25% R75% P
15
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.3

Concedes 1.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Cavalry FC - second-half results

42% W50% R8% P
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Pacific FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.20
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.8
Average goals in match1.42.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+1-6
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Cavalry FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pacific FC
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
3
8
46-60
3
4
61-75
2
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

Cavalry FC
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
4
1
31-45
4
0
46-60
4
3
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 2.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
62%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pacific FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.52
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
157%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Cavalry FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.86
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Pacific FCLigaCavalry FC
Average goals in match 3.332.90 2.42
Both teams scored 75%61% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%53% 42%
Clean sheets 0%20% 50%
Goal before half-time 75%57% 42%
Goal after half-time 100%86% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.90
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.47
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+3%
Home attack advantage
+3%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
33%
3 goals
14%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Pacific FC 1 - 1 - 3 Cavalry FC. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 20% matches.

Cavalry FC
3 : 0
Pacific FC
Pacific FC
3 : 3
Cavalry FC
Pacific FC
1 : 0
Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC
1 : 0
Pacific FC
Cavalry FC
4 : 0
Pacific FC

FAQ

What was the result of Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?

The Canadian Premier League match finished Pacific FC 1:2 Cavalry FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Pacific FC and Cavalry FC?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Pacific FC won 1, Cavalry FC won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?

Pacific FC score 1.08 goals per game on average and Cavalry FC 1.92. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.90 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Pacific FC's matches and 42% of Cavalry FC's.

What form are Pacific FC and Cavalry FC in?

Over the last 5 games Pacific FC have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Cavalry FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC?

The statistical background for Pacific FC vs Cavalry FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.