Portugal - Liga 3Estádio Capital do MóvelData current as of November 14, 2026

Paços de Ferreira vs CD Trofense: match statistics

Paços de Ferreira vs CD Trofense: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Paços de Ferreira played against CD Trofense in Liga 3 (Portugal). The game was played on November 8, 2026. Venue: Estádio Capital do Móvel. Final score: 4:3.

Recent form

Paços de Ferreira has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. CD Trofense has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Paços de Ferreira scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.63. CD Trofense scores 0.50 and allows 1.88. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Paços de Ferreira's games and 25% of CD Trofense's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 38%, compared with league averages of 49% for BTTS and 49% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Paços de Ferreira has the higher season xG average, 1.20 to 0.87 per game. Paços de Ferreira takes 8.8 shots per game, while CD Trofense takes 5.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Paços de Ferreira leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.63 goals per game after halftime. CD Trofense leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

Paços de Ferreira's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (3 goals). For CD Trofense, it is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga 3 games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 49% of games, and 49% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Paços de Ferreira have a clear edge in recent results, taking 8 points from 5 matches, compared with just 2 for CD Trofense, who have yet to record a win. The visitors have also failed to win any away games, averaging 0.5 goals on the road and drawing a blank in 75% of those matches. At home, Paços create chances worth an average of 1.37 xG, compared with Trofense’s 0.74 xG away from home, and average 4.25 shots on target against their opponents’ 1.5. Although Paços score just 0.75 goals per home match, the visitors’ defense concedes an average of 2 goals away, which points to a home win. A draw remains a realistic possibility, as Paços have won only 25% of their home matches so far.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS has occurred in only 25% of matches involving either team so far, and each has averaged just 0.5 goals per game. A goal from CD Trofense looks particularly unlikely: the visitors have failed to score in 75% of their matches, average 1.5 shots on target, and have an xG of 0.74. Paços de Ferreira have also been limited in front of goal, failing to score in 50% of their matches, although the visitors’ average of 2 goals conceded increases the hosts’ chances of finding the net. BTTS landed in 60% of the hosts’ last five appearances, compared with 40% for the visitors, so it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score (BTTS - No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: the hosts average 0.5 goals at home, while the visitors average 0.5 away, limiting both teams’ attacking potential. Over their last five matches, Paços de Ferreira averaged 1.2 goals scored, while CD Trofense averaged 0.6, although the visitors conceded as many as 2.4 goals per match. This defensive weakness gives the hosts a better chance of scoring, but the teams’ average xG figures—1.00 and 0.74, respectively—do not point to a particularly high goal total. Under 3.5 goals landed in 75% of the hosts’ matches and 50% of the visitors’ matches, making this line a clearer option than the riskier Under 2.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is Paços de Ferreira’s advantage over their last five matches: the hosts averaged 1.2 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while CD Trofense scored 0.6 and conceded 2.4. The hosts led at the break in 2 of those 5 matches, while the visitors were trailing at half-time in 3, which points to Paços taking the lead in the first half. Their ability to maintain that advantage is supported by their second-half form: the hosts have not lost a single second half in their last five matches, while the visitors have lost 4 of 5. However, the 1/1 HT/FT pick is not a certainty, as Paços have yet to lead at the break in their previous home matches; a half-time draw followed by a home win therefore remains a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
2 : 3
Second half

Game stats

53Possession (%)47
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
7Shots8
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
7Shots on target8
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
1.31xG1.47
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
4Corners7
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
50Dangerous attacks54
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
13Fouls11
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
3Cards0
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
1Goals scored / game0.5
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
1.63Goals allowed / game1.88
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
47%Average possession42%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
3.75Shots on target / game2.13
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.75Shots per game5.5
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
3.75Shots on target2.13
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
11.4%Shot conversion9.1%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
47%Possession42%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
1.2xG for0.87
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
1.45xG against1.57
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

Shooting quality

Paços de Ferreira: BalancedCD Trofense: Balanced
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
Accuracy (shots on target)43%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Paços de Ferreira is 300% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Paços de Ferreira · 0.4 pts / game - CD Trofense

Paços de Ferreira
DDWWL
Season result split
25% W25% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-4
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 at home
1-1-2
LLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
CD Trofense
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
13% W25% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-5
0.63 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-2
Last 5 away
0-2-2
LDDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paços de Ferreira is 100% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Paços de Ferreira · 0.5 goals / game - CD Trofense

Paços de Ferreira is 15% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.63 goals / game - Paços de Ferreira · 1.88 goals / game - CD Trofense

Paços de Ferreira scoring profile: very strong

Paços de Ferreira scores in 88% of games (7 of 8 games), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).

CD Trofense scoring profile: mixed

CD Trofense scores in 38% of games (3 of 8 games), while Paços de Ferreira keeps a clean sheet in 25% (2 of 8 games).

8Goals scored (season)4
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
13Goals conceded (season)15
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
2.63Average goals per game2.38
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
6Goals scored (last 5)3
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
6Goals conceded (last 5)12
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal38%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
13%2 goals13%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
0%3 goals0%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
0%4 goals0%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
50%2 goals63%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
25%3 goals25%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
13%4 goals25%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time13%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
0%Scored in both halves13%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
60%BTTS - last 540%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time13%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paços de Ferreira is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.88 pts / game - Paços de Ferreira · 0.63 pts / game - CD Trofense

Paços de Ferreira - half-time state
25% leading13% draw63% trailing
CD Trofense - half-time state
13% leading25% draw63% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.88Points per game (1st half)0.63
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
0.88Goals conceded (1st half)1.13
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
1.25Average goals (1st half)1.38
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
38%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
63%No goal before half-time75%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)0.63
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
1.38Average goals (2nd half)1
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
38%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense
50%No goal after half-time75%
Paços de FerreiraCD Trofense

Paços de Ferreira - second-half results

25% W50% D25% L
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.88
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

CD Trofense - second-half results

13% W25% D63% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.4

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Paços de Ferreira - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.80
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.4
Average goals per game1.21.2
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
CD Trofense - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.20
Goals scored / game0.40.2
Goals allowed / game1.41.0
Average goals per game1.81.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-5-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Paços de Ferreira
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
4
31-45
3
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
4
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
3
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
33%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Paços de Ferreira

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
142%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.68
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

Paços de FerreiraLigaCD Trofense
Average goals per game▲ 2.632.53▼ 2.38
Both teams scored▲ 63%49%▼ 25%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 50%49%▼ 38%
Clean sheets▼ 25%31%▼ 25%
Goal before half-time▲ 88%66%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▲ 75%73%▲ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per game
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / game
1.15
Away goals / game
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defensive advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Paços de FerreiraGoalJosé Manuel Costa Sacramento
  2. Paços de FerreiraGoalNuno Costa Cunha
  3. Paços de FerreiraGoalMiguel Maria Mariano Falé
  4. CD TrofenseGoalTomás Ferreira Monteiro Costa Oliveira
  5. CD TrofenseGoalWeliton Santos do AmaralAssist: Francisco Pedro Tiago Silva
  6. Paços de FerreiraYellow cardNuno Costa Cunha
  7. CD TrofenseGoalPedro Teixeira
  8. CD TrofenseSubstitutionOn: Matheus Gomes ClaudinoOff: Pedro Teixeira
  9. CD TrofenseSubstitutionOn: Kevyn de Assis Santos CamposOff: Weliton Santos do Amaral
  10. Paços de FerreiraYellow cardPedro Victor da Silva Santos
  11. Paços de FerreiraYellow cardJosé Manuel Costa Sacramento
  12. CD TrofenseSubstitutionOn: Kauã Oliveira SouzaOff: Tomás Ferreira Monteiro Costa Oliveira

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Paços de Ferreira vs CD Trofense?

The Liga 3 match finished Paços de Ferreira 4:3 CD Trofense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paços de Ferreira vs CD Trofense?

Paços de Ferreira score 1.00 goals per game on average and CD Trofense 0.50. The Liga 3 average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Paços de Ferreira's matches and 25% of CD Trofense's.

What form are Paços de Ferreira and CD Trofense in?

Over the last 5 games Paços de Ferreira have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and CD Trofense 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paços de Ferreira vs CD Trofense?

The statistical background for Paços de Ferreira vs CD Trofense — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.