Cyprus - Second DivisionGipedo PAEEK Keryneia EpistrofiData current as of October 15, 2026

PAEEK vs Akritas: match statistics

PAEEK crest
PAEEK
2 : 1half-time 2:0
Akritas crest
Akritas

PAEEK vs Akritas: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

PAEEK played against Akritas in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: Gipedo PAEEK Keryneia Epistrofi. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

PAEEK has 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.50 points per game. Akritas has 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 0.50 points per game.

Scoring records

PAEEK scores 2.00 goals per game and allows 2.50. Akritas scores 0.50 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.83 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 100% of PAEEK's games and 50% of Akritas's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 0%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Akritas has the higher season xG average, 1.23 to 1.21 per game. PAEEK takes 3.5 shots per game, while Akritas takes 9.5.

First-half and second-half trends

PAEEK leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Akritas leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

PAEEK's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). For Akritas, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 2.83 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

PAEEK hold a slight edge: they sit 9th compared with Akritas in 13th, and have scored 4 goals while conceding 1 across their two matches so far this season. In their last five matches, the hosts have scored 10 goals, whereas the visitors have managed just 4, pointing to greater attacking potential from PAEEK. However, their defense is a concern after conceding 14 goals in those five games, so a home win is far from certain. Akritas failed to score in their only away match so far, averaged 1 shot on target, and recorded an xG of 0.92, indicating difficulties creating quality chances. Given the visitors' limited away output, PAEEK are moderate favorites, although their defensive problems leave the door open for a draw or an upset.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Akritas’ away scoring record: they averaged 0 goals there, registering just 1 shot on target per match, and failed to score in 100% of those games. PAEEK look more dangerous at home, averaging 1 goal, 5 shots on target and an xG of 1.54, compared with the visitors’ 0.92 xG, making a PAEEK goal more likely than both teams scoring. There is still significant risk to this pick, as PAEEK conceded an average of 2.8 goals over their last 5 matches, while Akritas averaged 0.8 goals scored during that period. Even so, Akritas’ poor away scoring record outweighs this signal and slightly favors the scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: matches played by both teams so far have gone over this line 100% of the time, although the small sample size calls for caution. PAEEK’s last 5 matches averaged 4.8 goals, with the team scoring 2.0 and conceding 2.8 per game; Akritas averaged 2.2 goals. The hosts also have the edge in chance creation, averaging 1.54 xG compared with the visitors’ 0.92, and recording 5 shots on target to their opponents’ 1. Akritas have yet to score in their away matches, so I would not expect both sides to be equally prolific. Even so, PAEEK’s attack and Akritas’ average of 1.4 goals conceded over their last 5 matches give the 1.5 line a stronger edge than the riskier 2.5 threshold.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw is the most likely outcome: PAEEK were level at the break in 4 of their last 5 matches, while Akritas did so in 2 of 5. A subsequent home win is supported by PAEEK’s greater attacking strength—their average xG is 1.54 compared with the visitors’ 0.92, and across the home and away fixtures respectively, they average 5 shots on target to Akritas’ 1. PAEEK have also scored an average of 2.0 goals in their last five matches, while Akritas have lost 3 of 5 and conceded an average of 1.4 goals. The visitors lost the second half in 4 of their last 5 matches, increasing the likelihood of the game being decided after the break. However, the X/1 HT/FT pick is not a strong one: PAEEK also lost the second half in 3 of 5 matches, so a full-time draw remains a close alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

2 : 0
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

56Possession (%)44
PAEEKAkritas
8Shots12
PAEEKAkritas
4Shots on target3
PAEEKAkritas
1.16xG1.42
PAEEKAkritas
3Corners2
PAEEKAkritas
50Dangerous attacks62
PAEEKAkritas
23Fouls11
PAEEKAkritas
0Cards0
PAEEKAkritas

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

2Goals scored / game0.5
PAEEKAkritas
2.5Goals allowed / game1.5
PAEEKAkritas
19%Average possession50%
PAEEKAkritas
2Shots on target / game3
PAEEKAkritas

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

3.5Shots per game9.5
PAEEKAkritas
2Shots on target3
PAEEKAkritas
57.1%Shot conversion5.3%
PAEEKAkritas
19%Possession50%
PAEEKAkritas
1.21xG for1.23
PAEEKAkritas
1.4xG against1.28
PAEEKAkritas

Shooting quality

PAEEK: Counter-attackingAkritas: Balanced
PAEEKAkritas
Accuracy (shots on target)57%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.350.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.000.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

PAEEK is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / game - PAEEK · 0.5 pts / game - Akritas

PAEEK
LW
Season result split
50% W0% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-1
1.50 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.5xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Akritas
LD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W50% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PAEEK is 300% better for: goals scored per game.

2 goals / game - PAEEK · 0.5 goals / game - Akritas

Akritas is 67% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.5 goals / game - PAEEK · 1.5 goals / game - Akritas

PAEEK scoring profile: very strong

PAEEK scores in 100% of games (2 of 2 games), while Akritas keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).

Akritas scoring profile: very strong

Akritas scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 games), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 games).

4Goals scored (season)1
PAEEKAkritas
5Goals conceded (season)3
PAEEKAkritas
4.5Average goals per game2
PAEEKAkritas
4Goals scored (last 5)1
PAEEKAkritas
5Goals conceded (last 5)3
PAEEKAkritas

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal50%
PAEEKAkritas
100%2 goals0%
PAEEKAkritas
0%3 goals0%
PAEEKAkritas
0%4 goals0%
PAEEKAkritas

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
PAEEKAkritas
50%2 goals50%
PAEEKAkritas
50%3 goals0%
PAEEKAkritas
50%4 goals0%
PAEEKAkritas

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

100%BTTS at half-time0%
PAEEKAkritas
50%BTTS in both halves0%
PAEEKAkritas
100%Scored in both halves0%
PAEEKAkritas

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
PAEEKAkritas
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
PAEEKAkritas
100%BTTS - last 550%
PAEEKAkritas

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
PAEEKAkritas
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
PAEEKAkritas
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
PAEEKAkritas

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
PAEEKAkritas
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
PAEEKAkritas
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PAEEKAkritas

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Akritas is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - PAEEK · 1.5 pts / game - Akritas

PAEEK - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Akritas - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.5
PAEEKAkritas
1Goals scored (1st half)0.5
PAEEKAkritas
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
PAEEKAkritas
2Average goals (1st half)1
PAEEKAkritas
0%Clean sheet before half-time50%
PAEEKAkritas
0%No goal before half-time50%
PAEEKAkritas

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per game (2nd half)0
PAEEKAkritas
1Goals scored (2nd half)0
PAEEKAkritas
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1
PAEEKAkritas
2.5Average goals (2nd half)1
PAEEKAkritas
50%Clean sheet after half-time0%
PAEEKAkritas
0%No goal after half-time100%
PAEEKAkritas

PAEEK - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
2
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Akritas - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

PAEEK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.50
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game1.01.5
Average goals per game2.02.5
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet0%50%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 2
Akritas - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.500.00
Goals scored / game0.50.0
Goals allowed / game0.51.0
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%0%
No goal50%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

PAEEK
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Akritas
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.25
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

PAEEK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.79
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
164%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
155%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Akritas

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.95
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
31%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

PAEEKLigaAkritas
Average goals per game▲ 4.502.83▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%48%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%52%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 0%33%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%61%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%78%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.83
Average goals per game
48%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.22
Home goals / game
1.61
Away goals / game
+-24%
Home attack advantage
+-32%
Home defensive advantage
+-22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Gino Albertengo⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

—Hamed Dramé⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PAEEKGoalGino Albertengo
  2. AkritasGoalHamed Dramé

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of PAEEK vs Akritas?

The Second Division match finished PAEEK 2:1 Akritas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before PAEEK vs Akritas?

PAEEK score 2.00 goals per game on average and Akritas 0.50. The Second Division average is 2.83 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 100% of PAEEK's matches and 50% of Akritas's.

What form are PAEEK and Akritas in?

Over the last 5 games PAEEK have a 1-0-1 record (1.50 points per game) and Akritas 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PAEEK vs Akritas?

The statistical background for PAEEK vs Akritas — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.