Cyprus - Second DivisionData current as of 23 July 2026

PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics

PAEEK crest
PAEEK
2 : 1half-time 1:1
MEAP Nisou crest
MEAP Nisou
170%(0.00)
X20%(0.00)
210%(0.00)

PAEEK is displaying impressive home form with 75% of matches won at home and just 0% losses this season. The hosts occupy a high 2nd position in the table, boasting a +13 goal difference in home matches and averaging 2.13 goals scored per match with only 0.5 goals conceded. MEAP Nisou is in poor form, having lost 3 of their last 5 matches and scoring only 1 goal during this period. The visitors have poor efficiency in away matches (11% shot conversion) and as many as 38% of their matches end without scoring a goal. PAEEK's dominance in possession (58% vs 53%), higher shot accuracy (18% vs 11%), and advantage in clean sheets (63% vs 25%) further confirm the clear superiority of the hosts. Taking all these factors into account, a PAEEK victory is the most likely scenario for this match.

PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

PAEEK play MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The match date is 31 January 2026 at 13:30. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

PAEEK: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. MEAP Nisou: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

PAEEK scores 1.45 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. MEAP Nisou scores 1.07 and concedes 1.72. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: PAEEK 48%, MEAP Nisou 48%. Over 2.5: PAEEK 48%, MEAP Nisou 48%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

xG, shots and style

MEAP Nisou has higher xG: 1.42 vs 1.40. PAEEK: 6.7 shots per match, MEAP Nisou: 7.5.

Match halves

PAEEK: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.59. MEAP Nisou: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

PAEEK: 31-45+ (10 goals). MEAP Nisou: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.

Match description

PAEEK is displaying impressive home form with 75% of matches won at home and just 0% losses this season. The hosts occupy a high 2nd position in the table, boasting a +13 goal difference in home matches and averaging 2.13 goals scored per match with only 0.5 goals conceded. MEAP Nisou is in poor form, having lost 3 of their last 5 matches and scoring only 1 goal during this period. The visitors have poor efficiency in away matches (11% shot conversion) and as many as 38% of their matches end without scoring a goal. PAEEK's dominance in possession (58% vs 53%), higher shot accuracy (18% vs 11%), and advantage in clean sheets (63% vs 25%) further confirm the clear superiority of the hosts. Taking all these factors into account, a PAEEK victory is the most likely scenario for this match.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
10Shots7
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
5Shots on target2
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
1.35xG1.1
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
1Corners1
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
51Dangerous attacks71
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
-1Fouls-1
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
-1Cards-1
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.45Goals scored / match1.07
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
1.07Goals conceded / match1.72
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
39%Average possession40%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
3.17Shots on target / match2.9
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.72Shots per match7.55
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
3.17Shots on target2.9
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
21.5%Shot conversion14.2%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
39%Possession40%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
1.4xG for1.42
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
1.25xG against1.48
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

Shooting quality

PAEEK: Counter-attackingMEAP Nisou: Counter-attacking
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
Accuracy (shots on target)47%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.210.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PAEEK is 500% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - PAEEK · 0.2 pts / match - MEAP Nisou

PAEEK
WDDLD
Season result split
41% W34% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-7
1.59 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-6-1
Last 5 at home
0-4-1
LDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
MEAP Nisou
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W17% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-5-16
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-3-6
Last 5 away
2-0-3
WLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.10Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

PAEEK is 36% better for: goals scored per match.

1.45 goals / match - PAEEK · 1.07 goals / match - MEAP Nisou

PAEEK is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - PAEEK · 1.72 goals / match - MEAP Nisou

PAEEK scoring profile: very strong

PAEEK scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).

MEAP Nisou scoring profile: mixed

MEAP Nisou scores in 66% of matches (19 of 29 matches), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 48% (14 of 29 matches).

42Goals scored (season)31
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
31Goals conceded (season)50
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
2.52Average goals in match2.79
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
8Goals scored (last 5)5
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal66%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
45%2 goals28%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
24%3 goals10%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
3%4 goals3%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

How often they concede at least...

52%1 goal76%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
31%2 goals52%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
10%3 goals24%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
7%4 goals10%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time31%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
0%BTTS in both halves3%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
21%Scored in both halves17%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
60%BTTS - last 560%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

2nd half

62%Min. 1 goal after half-time69%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
34%Min. 2 goals after half-time34%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PAEEK is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.38 pts / match - PAEEK · 1.03 pts / match - MEAP Nisou

PAEEK - half-time state
28% leading55% draw17% trailing
MEAP Nisou - half-time state
21% leading41% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.38Points per match (1st half)1.03
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.62
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.9
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
1.48Average goals (1st half)1.52
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
59%Clean sheet before half-time34%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
48%No goal before half-time52%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)0.93
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
0.59Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
1.03Average goals (2nd half)1.28
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
66%Clean sheet after half-time48%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou
59%No goal after half-time66%
PAEEKMEAP Nisou

PAEEK - second-half results

28% W48% R24% P
40
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

MEAP Nisou - second-half results

17% W41% R41% P
30
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PAEEK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match1.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match2.61.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 7
MEAP Nisou - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

PAEEK
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
9
4
16-30
10
4
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
5
61-75
3
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

MEAP Nisou
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
7
6
16-30
8
16
31-45
5
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.66
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

PAEEK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

MEAP Nisou

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.59
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
124%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

PAEEKLigaMEAP Nisou
Average goals in match 2.522.72 2.79
Both teams scored 48%49% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 48%49% 48%
Clean sheets 48%30% 24%
Goal before half-time 66%72% 83%
Goal after half-time 62%77% 69%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
49%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.33
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): PAEEK 2 - 0 - 0 MEAP Nisou. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.

MEAP Nisou
1 : 2
PAEEK
MEAP Nisou
0 : 2
PAEEK

FAQ

What was the result of PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou?

The Second Division match finished PAEEK 2:1 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between PAEEK and MEAP Nisou?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches PAEEK won 2, MEAP Nisou won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou?

PAEEK score 1.45 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.07. The Second Division average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 48% of PAEEK's matches and 48% of MEAP Nisou's.

What form are PAEEK and MEAP Nisou in?

Over the last 5 games PAEEK have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou?

The statistical background for PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.