PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou: match statistics
PAEEK is displaying impressive home form with 75% of matches won at home and just 0% losses this season. The hosts occupy a high 2nd position in the table, boasting a +13 goal difference in home matches and averaging 2.13 goals scored per match with only 0.5 goals conceded. MEAP Nisou is in poor form, having lost 3 of their last 5 matches and scoring only 1 goal during this period. The visitors have poor efficiency in away matches (11% shot conversion) and as many as 38% of their matches end without scoring a goal. PAEEK's dominance in possession (58% vs 53%), higher shot accuracy (18% vs 11%), and advantage in clean sheets (63% vs 25%) further confirm the clear superiority of the hosts. Taking all these factors into account, a PAEEK victory is the most likely scenario for this match.
PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
PAEEK played against MEAP Nisou in Second Division (Cyprus). The game was played on January 31, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
PAEEK has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. MEAP Nisou has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
PAEEK scores 1.59 goals per game and allows 0.76. MEAP Nisou scores 1.06 and allows 1.76. Games in this league average 2.58 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 41% of PAEEK's games and 47% of MEAP Nisou's. The Over 2.5 rates are 41% and 47%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 43% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
MEAP Nisou has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.44 per game. PAEEK takes 9.2 shots per game, while MEAP Nisou takes 9.1.
First-half and second-half trends
PAEEK leads at halftime in 35% of its games and scores 0.82 goals per game after halftime. MEAP Nisou leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.41 after halftime.
When the teams score
PAEEK's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (7 goals). For MEAP Nisou, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 2.58 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 43% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
PAEEK is displaying impressive home form with 75% of matches won at home and just 0% losses this season. The hosts occupy a high 2nd position in the table, boasting a +13 goal difference in home matches and averaging 2.13 goals scored per match with only 0.5 goals conceded. MEAP Nisou is in poor form, having lost 3 of their last 5 matches and scoring only 1 goal during this period. The visitors have poor efficiency in away matches (11% shot conversion) and as many as 38% of their matches end without scoring a goal. PAEEK's dominance in possession (58% vs 53%), higher shot accuracy (18% vs 11%), and advantage in clean sheets (63% vs 25%) further confirm the clear superiority of the hosts. Taking all these factors into account, a PAEEK victory is the most likely scenario for this match.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| PAEEK | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 51% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
PAEEK is 200% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - PAEEK · 0.8 pts / game - MEAP Nisou
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
PAEEK is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.59 goals / game - PAEEK · 1.06 goals / game - MEAP Nisou
PAEEK is 132% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.76 goals / game - PAEEK · 1.76 goals / game - MEAP Nisou
PAEEK scores in 82% of games (14 of 17 meczów), while MEAP Nisou keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 meczów).
MEAP Nisou scores in 65% of games (11 of 17 meczów), while PAEEK keeps a clean sheet in 59% (10 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - PAEEK
Over / Under - MEAP Nisou
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
PAEEK is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / game - PAEEK · 1.12 pts / game - MEAP Nisou
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
PAEEK - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 53%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
MEAP Nisou - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
PAEEK
MEAP Nisou
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| PAEEK | Liga | MEAP Nisou | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.35 | 2.58 | ▲ 2.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 48% | • 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 43% | ▲ 47% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 59% | 30% | ▼ 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 65% | 71% | ▲ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 59% | 76% | ▼ 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- MEAP NisouGoalKyriakos Kyriakou
- PAEEKGoalEduard Andrei Lambrinoc
Head-to-head
Record from PAEEK's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against MEAP Nisou. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou?
The Second Division match finished PAEEK 2:1 MEAP Nisou. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou?
PAEEK score 1.59 goals per game on average and MEAP Nisou 1.06. The Second Division average is 2.58 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 43% of games. Both teams score in 41% of PAEEK's matches and 47% of MEAP Nisou's.
What form are PAEEK and MEAP Nisou in?
Over the last 5 games PAEEK have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and MEAP Nisou 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou?
The statistical background for PAEEK vs MEAP Nisou — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.