South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City: match statistics

Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Gimhae City crest
Gimhae City

Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paju Citizen play Gimhae City in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 5 April 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Paju Citizen: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Gimhae City: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paju Citizen scores 1.00 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Gimhae City scores 0.81 and concedes 2.06. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paju Citizen 47%, Gimhae City 69%. Over 2.5: Paju Citizen 47%, Gimhae City 56%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Paju Citizen has higher xG: 1.24 vs 1.21. Paju Citizen: 9.8 shots per match, Gimhae City: 9.3.

Match halves

Paju Citizen: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.41. Gimhae City: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.63.

Goals by minute

Paju Citizen: 76-90+ (5 goals). Gimhae City: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Paju Citizen are favorites to win at home: they average 1.0 goals scored per home match and concede only 0.5 goals per home match, keeping a clean sheet in 50% of home fixtures. Gimhae City average 0.0 goals scored on the road, concede 2.0 goals per away match and have failed to score in 100% of away games, with a shot conversion rate of 0%. Over the last 5 matches Paju have scored 7 goals and average 1.2 points per match, while Gimhae have conceded 11 goals in their last five fixtures and average just 0.6 points, indicating the visitors’ poorer form. The quality of created chances is comparable (0.93 xG for Paju versus 0.96 xG for Gimhae), but the visitors allow more opportunities for opponents (1.65 xG against them vs 1.39 xG against the hosts), which combined with the visitors’ lack of finishing favors a home victory.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Paju CitizenGimhae City
13Shots6
Paju CitizenGimhae City
6Shots on target4
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.64xG0.99
Paju CitizenGimhae City
4Corners1
Paju CitizenGimhae City
55Dangerous attacks45
Paju CitizenGimhae City
13Fouls16
Paju CitizenGimhae City
3Cards4
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Paju CitizenGimhae City
1Goals scored / match0.81
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.29Goals conceded / match2.06
Paju CitizenGimhae City
43%Average possession45%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
3.24Shots on target / match3.56
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.76Shots per match9.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
3.24Shots on target3.56
Paju CitizenGimhae City
10.2%Shot conversion8.8%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
43%Possession45%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.24xG for1.21
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.59xG against1.91
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Shooting quality

Paju Citizen: BalancedGimhae City: Balanced
Paju CitizenGimhae City
Accuracy (shots on target)33%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Gimhae City is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 1.4 pts / match - Gimhae City

Paju Citizen
LLLWD
Season result split
29% W18% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-9
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Gimhae City
WLDLW
Season result split
13% W19% R69% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-11
0.56 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 2.34BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paju Citizen is 23% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 0.81 goals / match - Gimhae City

Paju Citizen is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 2.06 goals / match - Gimhae City

Paju Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Paju Citizen scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

Gimhae City scoring profile: very strong

Gimhae City scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

17Goals scored (season)13
Paju CitizenGimhae City
22Goals conceded (season)33
Paju CitizenGimhae City
2.29Average goals in match2.88
Paju CitizenGimhae City
3Goals scored (last 5)5
Paju CitizenGimhae City
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Paju CitizenGimhae City

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal81%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
35%2 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
6%3 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal88%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
29%2 goals63%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
24%3 goals38%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
6%4 goals19%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time6%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
24%Scored in both halves0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
40%BTTS - last 560%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time13%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paju Citizen is 113% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.47 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 0.69 pts / match - Gimhae City

Paju Citizen - half-time state
29% leading59% draw12% trailing
Gimhae City - half-time state
13% leading31% draw56% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)0.69
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.19
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1Average goals (1st half)0.94
Paju CitizenGimhae City
65%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
53%No goal before half-time81%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)0.81
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)0.63
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)1.31
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.94
Paju CitizenGimhae City
41%Clean sheet after half-time25%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
65%No goal after half-time38%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Paju Citizen - second-half results

18% W35% R47% P
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Gimhae City - second-half results

13% W44% R44% P
11
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 13%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paju Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Gimhae City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
3
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
4
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Gimhae City
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
5
16-30
1
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
1
7
61-75
5
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Gimhae City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.70
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
147%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.84
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Paju CitizenLigaGimhae City
Average goals in match 2.292.75 2.88
Both teams scored 47%61% 69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%56% 56%
Clean sheets 29%24% 13%
Goal before half-time 53%73% 75%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City?

The K League 2 match finished Paju Citizen 3:1 Gimhae City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City?

Paju Citizen score 1.00 goals per game on average and Gimhae City 0.81. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Paju Citizen's matches and 69% of Gimhae City's.

What form are Paju Citizen and Gimhae City in?

Over the last 5 games Paju Citizen have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Gimhae City 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.