South Korea - K League 2Data current as of September 13, 2026

Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City: match statistics

Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen
3 : 1half-time 1:0
Gimhae City crest
Gimhae City

Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Paju Citizen played against Gimhae City in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on April 5, 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

Paju Citizen has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Gimhae City has 0 wins, 0 draws and 4 losses, with 0.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Paju Citizen scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 1.40. Gimhae City scores 0.50 and allows 2.75. Games in this league average 2.89 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Paju Citizen's games and 50% of Gimhae City's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 75%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 61% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Paju Citizen has the higher season xG average, 1.20 to 1.16 per game. Paju Citizen takes 8.8 shots per game, while Gimhae City takes 9.5.

First-half and second-half trends

Paju Citizen leads at halftime in 40% of its games and scores 0.40 goals per game after halftime. Gimhae City leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.25 after halftime.

When the teams score

Paju Citizen's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (3 goals). For Gimhae City, it is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 2 games average 2.89 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 61% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Paju Citizen are favorites to win at home: they average 1.0 goals scored per home match and concede only 0.5 goals per home match, keeping a clean sheet in 50% of home fixtures. Gimhae City average 0.0 goals scored on the road, concede 2.0 goals per away match and have failed to score in 100% of away games, with a shot conversion rate of 0%. Over the last 5 matches Paju have scored 7 goals and average 1.2 points per match, while Gimhae have conceded 11 goals in their last five fixtures and average just 0.6 points, indicating the visitors’ poorer form. The quality of created chances is comparable (0.93 xG for Paju versus 0.96 xG for Gimhae), but the visitors allow more opportunities for opponents (1.65 xG against them vs 1.39 xG against the hosts), which combined with the visitors’ lack of finishing favors a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes at 72% vs 28% because the statistical signals strongly indicate goals from both sides. The home side has a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% and 60% in the last 5 matches, while the league average BTTS is 63%, providing a solid context for both teams to score. Both teams have 0% clean sheets this season; the home team concedes an average of 3.0 goals per match and the visitors 2.0, so the risk of conceding on both sides is high. xG shows 1.22 for the home team vs 0.96 for the visitors, and in the last 5 matches xG_for is 1.17 and 1.25 with xG_against 1.34 and 1.53, indicating chance creation and goal threat from both teams. Despite the visitors’ season conversion rate being 0% and only 2 goals this season, they have scored 5 goals in the last 5 fixtures and average 4.0 shots on target, so a Goal/Goal outcome is realistic.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on home xG 1.22 and away xG 0.96, and xG against 1.82 (Paju) and 1.65 (Gimhae), the calculated forecast is about 1.44 goals for Paju and 1.39 for Gimhae (total 2.83). Additionally, Paju concedes 3.0 goals on average at home and Gimhae concedes 2.0 on the road, which increases the likelihood of goals in this match. In the last 5 matches Paju averaged 1.4 scored and 1.4 conceded (2.8 total), while Gimhae averaged 1.0 scored and 2.2 conceded (3.2 total); the percentage of Over 2.5 goals in the last 5 is 60% for Paju and 80% for Gimhae. Seasonally Paju has 100% of home matches Over 2.5, and Gimhae has 0% of away matches Over 2.5, so signals are mixed, but combined xG and current form lean toward an Over 2.5 selection, which I rate at ~70% probability.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I back HT/FT 1/1 (Paju leads at the break and wins). The home side has the superior xG of 1.22 versus 0.96 and better form — 1.2 points per game in the last five for Paju versus 0.6 for Gimhae — which increases the hosts’ chances of victory. At half-time Paju have averaged 1.0 goals in their last five HTs, while Gimhae average 0.6, and the hosts led at the break in 40% of those matches. Gimhae, however, struggle to finish chances: a season goals average of 0.0 and a conversion rate of 0.0 despite averaging 4.0 shots on target, which reduces their ability to mount a turnaround. Paju are vulnerable to goals late on (3 conceded in mins 61–75 and 4 conceded in mins 76–90), but the last five matches show defensive stabilization (conceding 1.4 goals on average), so I have weighted the 1/1 scenario the most.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

47Possession (%)53
Paju CitizenGimhae City
13Shots6
Paju CitizenGimhae City
6Shots on target4
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.64xG0.99
Paju CitizenGimhae City
4Corners1
Paju CitizenGimhae City
55Dangerous attacks45
Paju CitizenGimhae City
13Fouls16
Paju CitizenGimhae City
3Cards4
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.4Goals scored / game0.5
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.4Goals allowed / game2.75
Paju CitizenGimhae City
41%Average possession43%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
4.4Shots on target / game3
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

8.8Shots per game9.5
Paju CitizenGimhae City
4.4Shots on target3
Paju CitizenGimhae City
15.9%Shot conversion5.3%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
41%Possession43%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.2xG for1.16
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.43xG against1.78
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Shooting quality

Paju Citizen: Counter-attackingGimhae City: Balanced
Paju CitizenGimhae City
Accuracy (shots on target)50%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Paju Citizen
LLWWL
Season result split
40% W0% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.20Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Gimhae City
LLLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-4
0.00 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-4
0.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.5Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.16Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 75%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paju Citizen is 180% better for: goals scored per game.

1.4 goals / game - Paju Citizen · 0.5 goals / game - Gimhae City

Paju Citizen is 96% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.4 goals / game - Paju Citizen · 2.75 goals / game - Gimhae City

Paju Citizen scoring profile: very strong

Paju Citizen scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Gimhae City keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).

Gimhae City scoring profile: strong

Gimhae City scores in 50% of games (2 of 4 meczów), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).

7Goals scored (season)2
Paju CitizenGimhae City
7Goals conceded (season)11
Paju CitizenGimhae City
2.8Average goals per game3.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
7Goals scored (last 5)2
Paju CitizenGimhae City
7Goals conceded (last 5)11
Paju CitizenGimhae City

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal50%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
60%2 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0%3 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal100%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
40%2 goals100%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
20%3 goals50%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0%4 goals25%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

60%BTTS at half-time0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
20%BTTS in both halves0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
40%Scored in both halves0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
60%BTTS - last 550%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time75%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paju Citizen is 113% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.6 pts / game - Paju Citizen · 0.75 pts / game - Gimhae City

Paju Citizen - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing
Gimhae City - half-time state
25% leading0% draw75% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.6Points per game (1st half)0.75
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1Goals scored (1st half)0.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.75
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1.8Average goals (1st half)1
Paju CitizenGimhae City
40%Clean sheet before half-time25%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
20%No goal before half-time75%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)0.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)2
Paju CitizenGimhae City
1Average goals (2nd half)2.25
Paju CitizenGimhae City
60%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Paju CitizenGimhae City
60%No goal after half-time75%
Paju CitizenGimhae City

Paju Citizen - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 40% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Gimhae City - second-half results

0% W25% D75% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.3

Allows 1.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Paju Citizen - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.601.00
Goals scored / game1.00.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.81.0
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 5
Gimhae City - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.750.25
Goals scored / game0.30.3
Goals allowed / game0.82.0
Average goals per game1.02.3
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%75%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet25%0%
No goal75%75%
Goal difference-2-7
Half-time: 25% leading - 0% draw - 75% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 25% draw - 75% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
3
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Gimhae City
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
4
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.03
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
2.1 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Gimhae City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.63
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.97
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
33%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
198%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Paju CitizenLigaGimhae City
Average goals per game 2.802.89 3.25
Both teams scored 60%63% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%61% 75%
Clean sheets 20%23% 0%
Goal before half-time 80%85% 100%
Goal after half-time 60%67% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.89
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / game
1.50
Away goals / game
+-7%
Home attack advantage
+-8%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Gimhae CityYellow cardMaissa El Hadji Fall
  2. Paju CitizenSubstitutionOn: Taek-Geun LeeOff: Min-Seong Kim
  3. Paju CitizenGoalBorja González TomásAssist: Hyun-Tae Kim
  4. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Jun-Gyu LeeOff: Seung-Min Moon
  5. Paju CitizenGoalJoon-Suk LeeAssist: Jae-jun You
  6. Paju CitizenYellow cardTaek-Geun Lee
  7. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Seung-Jae LeeOff: Seul-Chan Lee
  8. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Hyun-Jin SeolOff: Byung-Kwon Yoon
  9. Gimhae CityYellow cardBruno Xavier Almeida Costa
  10. Paju CitizenGoalBeom-Kyung Choi
  11. Gimhae CitySubstitutionOn: Min-young LeeOff: Beka Mikeltadze
  12. Gimhae CityGoalSeung-Jae LeeAssist: Jae-Yul Yeo
  13. Gimhae CityYellow cardRae-Jun Lee
  14. Paju CitizenYellow cardJae-jun You
  15. Paju CitizenYellow cardChan-ho Lee
  16. Gimhae CityYellow cardMiguel Baggio Cover

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City?

The K League 2 match finished Paju Citizen 3:1 Gimhae City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City?

Paju Citizen score 1.40 goals per game on average and Gimhae City 0.50. The K League 2 average is 2.89 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Paju Citizen's matches and 50% of Gimhae City's.

What form are Paju Citizen and Gimhae City in?

Over the last 5 games Paju Citizen have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Gimhae City 0-0-4 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paju Citizen vs Gimhae City: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.