Paju Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons: match statistics
Jeonnam Dragons appear to be the favorites for this match despite playing away. The hosts, Paju Citizen, have catastrophic home statistics – zero wins, zero draws, and 100% losses in home matches, without scoring a single goal at their own stadium. The visitors, on the other hand, display much better offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 2 goals per away match with an 18% conversion rate. Jeonnam Dragons have won 33% of their away matches and have better xG statistics (1.28 vs 0.83), indicating a higher quality of chances created. Although both teams have an identical points tally in their last 5 matches (1.2 PPG) and a goal difference of -1, Paju Citizen's home form (100% losses) and their complete lack of scoring at home speak decisively in favor of the visitors. I expect a difficult but victorious match for Jeonnam Dragons.
Paju Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Paju Citizen played against Jeonnam Dragons in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on March 21, 2026. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Paju Citizen has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Jeonnam Dragons has 1 win, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Paju Citizen scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.67. Jeonnam Dragons scores 2.00 and allows 2.33. Games in this league average 3.46 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Paju Citizen's games and 67% of Jeonnam Dragons's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 67%, compared with league averages of 75% for BTTS and 71% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Paju Citizen has the higher season xG average, 1.40 to 1.28 per game. Paju Citizen takes 11.3 shots per game, while Jeonnam Dragons takes 11.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Paju Citizen leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Jeonnam Dragons leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Paju Citizen's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Jeonnam Dragons, it is minutes 31-45+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 3.46 goals. Both teams score in 75% of games, and 71% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Jeonnam Dragons appear to be the favorites for this match despite playing away. The hosts, Paju Citizen, have catastrophic home statistics – zero wins, zero draws, and 100% losses in home matches, without scoring a single goal at their own stadium. The visitors, on the other hand, display much better offensive efficiency, scoring an average of 2 goals per away match with an 18% conversion rate. Jeonnam Dragons have won 33% of their away matches and have better xG statistics (1.28 vs 0.83), indicating a higher quality of chances created. Although both teams have an identical points tally in their last 5 matches (1.2 PPG) and a goal difference of -1, Paju Citizen's home form (100% losses) and their complete lack of scoring at home speak decisively in favor of the visitors. I expect a difficult but victorious match for Jeonnam Dragons.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Paju Citizen | Jeonnam Dragons | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Jeonnam Dragons is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Paju Citizen · 2 goals / game - Jeonnam Dragons
Paju Citizen is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.67 goals / game - Paju Citizen · 2.33 goals / game - Jeonnam Dragons
Paju Citizen scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Jeonnam Dragons keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
Jeonnam Dragons scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 meczów), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Paju Citizen
Over / Under - Jeonnam Dragons
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paju Citizen is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - Paju Citizen · 1.33 pts / game - Jeonnam Dragons
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Paju Citizen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Jeonnam Dragons - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.67 | 0.33 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.7 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 67% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.3 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| Average goals per game | 2.3 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 67% | 67% |
| 3 goals | 33% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 0% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Paju Citizen
Jeonnam Dragons
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Paju Citizen | Liga | Jeonnam Dragons | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.46 | ▲ 4.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 67% | 75% | ▼ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 67% | 71% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 13% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 92% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 83% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
FAQ
What was the result of Paju Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons?
The K League 2 match finished Paju Citizen 2:0 Jeonnam Dragons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Paju Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons?
Paju Citizen score 1.33 goals per game on average and Jeonnam Dragons 2.00. The K League 2 average is 3.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 71% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Paju Citizen's matches and 67% of Jeonnam Dragons's.
What form are Paju Citizen and Jeonnam Dragons in?
Over the last 5 games Paju Citizen have a 1-0-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Jeonnam Dragons 1-0-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paju Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paju Citizen vs Jeonnam Dragons: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.