South Korea - K League 2Data current as of 23 July 2026

Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics

Paju Citizen crest
Paju Citizen
1 : 3half-time 1:1
Seoul E-Land crest
Seoul E-Land

Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paju Citizen play Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The match date is 11 April 2026 at 09:30. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Paju Citizen: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Seoul E-Land: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paju Citizen scores 1.00 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Seoul E-Land scores 1.76 and concedes 1.24. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paju Citizen 47%, Seoul E-Land 65%. Over 2.5: Paju Citizen 47%, Seoul E-Land 76%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Seoul E-Land has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.24. Paju Citizen: 9.8 shots per match, Seoul E-Land: 13.3.

Match halves

Paju Citizen: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.41. Seoul E-Land: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 1.12.

Goals by minute

Paju Citizen: 76-90+ (5 goals). Seoul E-Land: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

K League 2: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

I back the home win (1). At home the hosts concede only 0.67 goals per match on average, while Seoul E-Land concede 1.00 on the road; the hosts also have a superior home goal difference (+3) versus the visitors’ +1 away. In attack the hosts register 5 shots on target per home match with a 19% conversion rate, compared to the visitors’ 4.33 SoT and 13% conversion, indicating higher efficiency from the hosts despite fewer attempts. Although Seoul E-Land have a higher away xG (1.27 vs hosts’ xG 1.16) and have scored 9 goals in the last 5 matches (vs hosts’ 8), their average away xGA is 1.90, showing vulnerability to opponent chance creation. Given the better home defense, higher conversion and advantage in goal difference, I assign roughly a 55% probability to the home win, 25% to a draw and 20% to an away win.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
9Shots16
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1Shots on target7
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0.79xG1.72
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
3Corners10
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
20Dangerous attacks30
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
17Fouls17
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1Cards2
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1Goals scored / match1.76
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1.29Goals conceded / match1.24
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
43%Average possession50%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
3.24Shots on target / match5.41
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.76Shots per match13.29
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
3.24Shots on target5.41
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
10.2%Shot conversion13.3%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
43%Possession50%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1.24xG for1.61
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1.59xG against1.24
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Shooting quality

Paju Citizen: BalancedSeoul E-Land: Efficient finishing
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
Accuracy (shots on target)33%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Seoul E-Land is 150% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Paju Citizen · 2 pts / match - Seoul E-Land

Paju Citizen
LLLWD
Season result split
29% W18% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-9
1.06 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 at home
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Seoul E-Land
WWLWD
Season result split
53% W18% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-5
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WLWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.86Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Seoul E-Land is 76% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Paju Citizen · 1.76 goals / match - Seoul E-Land

Paju Citizen scoring profile: strong

Paju Citizen scores in 59% of matches (10 of 17 matches), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

Seoul E-Land scoring profile: very strong

Seoul E-Land scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Paju Citizen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 matches).

17Goals scored (season)30
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
22Goals conceded (season)21
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
2.29Average goals in match3
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
3Goals scored (last 5)10
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

How often they score at least...

59%1 goal88%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
35%2 goals59%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
6%3 goals29%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal71%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
29%2 goals41%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
24%3 goals12%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
6%4 goals0%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time24%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
6%BTTS in both halves0%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
24%Scored in both halves35%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS65%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
40%BTTS - last 580%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

2nd half

71%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
35%Min. 2 goals after half-time65%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paju Citizen - half-time state
29% leading59% draw12% trailing
Seoul E-Land - half-time state
35% leading41% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.47Points per match (1st half)1.47
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.47
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1Average goals (1st half)1.12
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
65%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
53%No goal before half-time47%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

After half-time (2nd half)

0.88Points per match (2nd half)1.82
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0.41Goals scored (2nd half)1.12
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
0.88Goals conceded (2nd half)0.76
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
1.29Average goals (2nd half)1.88
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
41%Clean sheet after half-time47%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land
65%No goal after half-time29%
Paju CitizenSeoul E-Land

Paju Citizen - second-half results

18% W35% R47% P
25
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Seoul E-Land - second-half results

53% W24% R24% P
25
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding151%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paju Citizen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.40
Goals scored / match0.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.2
Average goals in match0.41.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Seoul E-Land - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.00
Goals scored / match0.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.21.0
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paju Citizen
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
4
0
16-30
3
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
4
61-75
5
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Seoul E-Land
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
4
4
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
5
4
61-75
10
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.65
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paju Citizen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.26
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Seoul E-Land

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).

Teams vs league

Paju CitizenLigaSeoul E-Land
Average goals in match 2.292.75 3.00
Both teams scored 47%61% 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%56% 76%
Clean sheets 29%24% 29%
Goal before half-time 53%73% 76%
Goal after half-time 71%76% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.35
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+1%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land?

The K League 2 match finished Paju Citizen 1:3 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land?

Paju Citizen score 1.00 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.76. The K League 2 average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Paju Citizen's matches and 65% of Seoul E-Land's.

What form are Paju Citizen and Seoul E-Land in?

Over the last 5 games Paju Citizen have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paju Citizen vs Seoul E-Land: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.