Hungary - NB IData current as of September 13, 2026

Paksi SE vs Győri ETO: match statistics

Paksi SE crest
Paksi SE
3 : 4half-time 1:3
Győri ETO crest
Győri ETO
130%(2.75)
X25%(3.50)
245%(2.01)

Győri ETO, as the league leader, presents significantly better form than Paksi SE, confirmed by the points per match record in the last 5 meetings (2.2 vs 0.6). The visitors have not lost any of their last five matches (3 wins, 2 draws), while the hosts have won just once and recorded four consecutive defeats. Győri ETO boasts impressive away effectiveness with 55% wins and never returns without a goal (0% FTS), scoring an average of 2.45 goals per away match. Paksi SE is going through a form crisis, illustrated by a series of five defeats, poor defensive disposition (11 goals conceded in the last 5 matches), and only 9% clean sheets at home. The goal difference away for Győri (+14) compared to Paksi's balance at home (+5) further speaks for the favorite. Considering all statistics, a victory for the visitors is the most probable scenario for this meeting.

Paksi SE vs Győri ETO: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Paksi SE played against Győri ETO in NB I (Hungary). The game was played on February 22, 2026. Final score: 3:4.

Recent form

Paksi SE has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Győri ETO has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Paksi SE scores 1.91 goals per game and allows 1.41. Győri ETO scores 1.95 and allows 0.95. Games in this league average 3.00 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 73% of Paksi SE's games and 55% of Győri ETO's. The Over 2.5 rates are 68% and 45%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 59% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Paksi SE has the higher season xG average, 2.08 to 2.05 per game. Paksi SE takes 16.8 shots per game, while Győri ETO takes 17.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Paksi SE leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 1.18 goals per game after halftime. Győri ETO leads at halftime in 55% and scores 1.05 after halftime.

When the teams score

Paksi SE's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). For Győri ETO, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

NB I games average 3.00 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 59% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Győri ETO, as the league leader, presents significantly better form than Paksi SE, confirmed by the points per match record in the last 5 meetings (2.2 vs 0.6). The visitors have not lost any of their last five matches (3 wins, 2 draws), while the hosts have won just once and recorded four consecutive defeats. Győri ETO boasts impressive away effectiveness with 55% wins and never returns without a goal (0% FTS), scoring an average of 2.45 goals per away match. Paksi SE is going through a form crisis, illustrated by a series of five defeats, poor defensive disposition (11 goals conceded in the last 5 matches), and only 9% clean sheets at home. The goal difference away for Győri (+14) compared to Paksi's balance at home (+5) further speaks for the favorite. Considering all statistics, a victory for the visitors is the most probable scenario for this meeting.

View the statistical overview

Stats by half

1 : 3
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

48Possession (%)52
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
20Shots16
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
8Shots on target9
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
2.28xG1.88
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
4Corners2
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
63Dangerous attacks32
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
11Fouls16
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
3Cards3
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Paksi SEGyőri ETO
1.91Goals scored / game1.95
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
1.41Goals allowed / game0.95
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
49%Average possession59%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
6.5Shots on target / game6.5
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

16.82Shots per game17.18
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
6.5Shots on target6.5
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
11.4%Shot conversion11.4%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
49%Possession59%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
2.08xG for2.05
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
1.63xG against1.22
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

Shooting quality

Paksi SE: AttackingGyőri ETO: Dominant
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
Accuracy (shots on target)39%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Győri ETO is 83% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Paksi SE · 2.2 pts / game - Győri ETO

Paksi SE
WWLLL
Season result split
45% W27% D27% L
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-6
1.64 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Győri ETO
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
55% W32% D14% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-7-3
1.95 pts / game · goal difference +22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWWWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Győri ETO is 48% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.41 goals / game - Paksi SE · 0.95 goals / game - Győri ETO

Paksi SE scoring profile: very strong

Paksi SE scores in 82% of games (18 of 22 meczów), while Győri ETO keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 meczów).

Győri ETO scoring profile: very strong

Győri ETO scores in 86% of games (19 of 22 meczów), while Paksi SE keeps a clean sheet in 14% (3 of 22 meczów).

42Goals scored (season)43
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
31Goals conceded (season)21
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
3.32Average goals per game2.91
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
5Goals scored (last 5)9
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

How often they score at least...

82%1 goal86%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
59%2 goals55%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
32%3 goals36%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
9%4 goals5%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal64%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
41%2 goals23%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
14%3 goals9%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
0%4 goals0%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time18%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
18%BTTS in both halves9%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
45%Scored in both halves36%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS36%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
60%BTTS - last 560%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

55%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

2nd half

95%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
45%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Győri ETO is 43% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / game - Paksi SE · 1.95 pts / game - Győri ETO

Paksi SE - half-time state
23% leading68% draw9% trailing
Győri ETO - half-time state
55% leading32% draw14% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per game (1st half)1.95
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.91
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.32
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.23
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
64%Clean sheet before half-time68%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
50%No goal before half-time45%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per game (2nd half)1.77
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
1.18Goals scored (2nd half)1.05
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.64
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
2.18Average goals (2nd half)1.68
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
27%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO
23%No goal after half-time32%
Paksi SEGyőri ETO

Paksi SE - second-half results

41% W23% D36% L
30
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding196%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 45%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Győri ETO - second-half results

50% W27% D23% L
43
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
+13
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.95
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 55% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.3

Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Paksi SE - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.60
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.21.0
Average goals per game0.81.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 0% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Győri ETO - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.00
Goals scored / game0.61.2
Goals allowed / game0.20.6
Average goals per game0.81.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Paksi SE
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
7
4
16-30
7
4
31-45
8
7
46-60
5
8
61-75
13
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Győri ETO
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
8
2
16-30
8
4
31-45
2
6
46-60
10
4
61-75
11
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.11
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Paksi SE

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Győri ETO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.83
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.27
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
62%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB I).

Teams vs league

Paksi SELigaGyőri ETO
Average goals per game 3.323.00 2.91
Both teams scored 73%60% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%59% 45%
Clean sheets 14%21% 36%
Goal before half-time 55%69% 68%
Goal after half-time 95%88% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per game
60%
Both teams scored
59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / game
1.46
Away goals / game
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defensive advantage
+-2%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
24%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Győri ETOGoalSzabolcs Schön
  2. Győri ETOGoalMilán VitálisAssist: Barnabás Bíró
  3. Győri ETOGoalSzabolcs Schön
  4. Paksi SEYellow cardGergő Gyurkits
  5. Paksi SEGoalBarna TóthAssist: János Szabó
  6. Győri ETOYellow cardSzabolcs Schön
  7. Paksi SEYellow cardBence Lenzsér
  8. Győri ETOSubstitutionOn: Kevin BánátiOff: Nfansu Njie
  9. Paksi SESubstitutionOn: Márió ZekeOff: Zsombor Bévárdi
  10. Paksi SESubstitutionOn: Csaba MátéOff: Kevin Horváth
  11. Győri ETOSubstitutionOn: Claudiu Vasile BumbaOff: Szabolcs Schön
  12. Győri ETOGoalMárk CsingerAssist: Daniel Štefulj
  13. Paksi SESubstitutionOn: Milán SzekszárdiOff: Erik Silye
  14. Győri ETOYellow cardMiljan Krpić
  15. Paksi SEGoalBalász Balogh
  16. Paksi SEYellow cardBarna Tóth
  17. Paksi SEGoalMartin Ádám
  18. Győri ETOYellow cardTóth Rajmund

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Peter AntalMatches officiated: 8
5.63Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 213%Home wins38%Draws50%Away wins

Head-to-head

Record from Paksi SE's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Győri ETO. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Győri ETO FC
0 : 0
Paksi SE
Paksi SE
3 : 3
Győri ETO FC

FAQ

What was the result of Paksi SE vs Győri ETO?

The NB I match finished Paksi SE 3:4 Győri ETO. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Paksi SE and Győri ETO?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Paksi SE won 0, Győri ETO won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Paksi SE vs Győri ETO?

Paksi SE score 1.91 goals per game on average and Győri ETO 1.95. The NB I average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 59% of games. Both teams score in 73% of Paksi SE's matches and 55% of Győri ETO's.

What form are Paksi SE and Győri ETO in?

Over the last 5 games Paksi SE have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Győri ETO 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paksi SE vs Győri ETO?

The statistical background for Paksi SE vs Győri ETO — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.