Palermo vs Cesena: match statistics
Palermo vs Cesena: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Palermo play Cesena in Serie B (Italy). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 17:15. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Palermo: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Cesena: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Palermo scores 1.58 and concedes 0.90 goals per match. Cesena scores 1.18 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.55 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Palermo 40%, Cesena 61%. Over 2.5: Palermo 45%, Cesena 53%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.
xG, shots and style
Palermo has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.45. Palermo: 14.2 shots per match, Cesena: 13.1.
Match halves
Palermo: half-time lead 48%, second-half goals 0.90. Cesena: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.61.
Goals by minute
Palermo: 76-90+ (16 goals). Cesena: 31-45+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Serie B: 2.55 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Palermo is the clear favorite: at home they win 71% of matches and have a positive goal difference of +23, scoring 1.94 goals and conceding only 0.59 per game. Cesena are weaker away — they win 35% of matches, have a negative goal difference of -8, score 1.00 goal and concede 1.47 per game. The home side creates more and better chances (14.82 shots and 5.24 on target per home match, conversion 13% and xG 1.64) compared to Cesena (11.29 shots, 3.47 on target, conversion 9% and xG 1.27). In the last 5 matches Palermo are 2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss (1.6 points per game; 6 goals scored and 6 conceded), while Cesena are 1-2-2 (1.0 point per game; 6 scored and 9 conceded), which indicates greater stability for the hosts. Considering Palermo’s 65% clean sheets at home versus Cesena’s 12% away, together with the advantage in xG and efficiency, I tip a home win and estimate probabilities: Palermo 68%, draw 18%, Cesena 14%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Palermo | Cesena | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Palermo is 250% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Palermo · 0.4 pts / match - Cesena
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Palermo is 34% better for: goals scored per match.
1.58 goals / match - Palermo · 1.18 goals / match - Cesena
Palermo is 63% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.9 goals / match - Palermo · 1.47 goals / match - Cesena
Palermo scores in 78% of matches (31 of 40 matches), while Cesena keeps a clean sheet in 18% (7 of 38 matches).
Cesena scores in 71% of matches (27 of 38 matches), while Palermo keeps a clean sheet in 45% (18 of 40 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Palermo
Over / Under — Cesena
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Palermo is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.7 pts / match - Palermo · 1.16 pts / match - Cesena
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Palermo - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 48% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cesena - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Palermo
Cesena
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie B).
Teams vs league
| Palermo | Liga | Cesena | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.48 | 2.55 | ▲ 2.66 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 53% | ▲ 61% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 48% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 45% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 70% | • 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 78% | ▼ 74% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Palermo 0 - 1 - 0 Cesena. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Palermo vs Cesena?
The Serie B match finished Palermo 2:0 Cesena. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Palermo vs Cesena?
Palermo score 1.58 goals per game on average and Cesena 1.18. The Serie B average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Palermo's matches and 61% of Cesena's.
What form are Palermo and Cesena in?
Over the last 5 games Palermo have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Cesena 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Palermo vs Cesena?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Palermo vs Cesena: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.