Tanzania - Ligi kuu BaraCCM Kirumba StadiumData current as of 17 July 2026

Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons: match statistics

Pamba Jiji crest
Pamba Jiji
2 : 3half-time 0:1
Tanzania Prisons crest
Tanzania Prisons

Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Pamba Jiji play Tanzania Prisons in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 26 May 2026 at 13:00. Venue: CCM Kirumba Stadium. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Pamba Jiji: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Tanzania Prisons: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Pamba Jiji scores 1.07 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Tanzania Prisons scores 0.72 and concedes 1.31. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Pamba Jiji 40%, Tanzania Prisons 31%. Over 2.5: Pamba Jiji 50%, Tanzania Prisons 38%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

xG, shots and style

Pamba Jiji has higher xG: 1.28 vs 0.95. Pamba Jiji: 5.3 shots per match, Tanzania Prisons: 3.6.

Match halves

Pamba Jiji: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.47. Tanzania Prisons: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.38.

Goals by minute

Pamba Jiji: 0-15 (7 goals). Tanzania Prisons: 0-15 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Pamba Jiji are the favorites: they sit 7th and have scored 23 goals this season versus Tanzania Prisons’ 12, and at home the hosts average 1.27 goals scored and 0.73 conceded per match. In their last 5 games Pamba Jiji scored 4 goals and averaged 1.4 points per match, while Tanzania Prisons managed only 2 goals, 0.6 points per match and conceded as many as 11 goals in their last five fixtures. The hosts’ defense is superior: Pamba have 55% of home matches with a clean sheet, whereas the visitors have only 9% clean sheets on the road and fail to score in 73% of their away matches. Finishing efficiency also favors the hosts — Pamba’s shot conversion is 19% with an average of 2.67 shots on target per match, versus 5% conversion and 2.63 shots on target for the visitors; average xG is 1.31 for Pamba and 1.20 for Tanzania Prisons. Considering the efficiency advantage (19% vs 5%), the difference in average goals conceded (0.73 vs 1.55) and the high away loss rate for the visitors (82%), I tip the hosts to win.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

47Possession (%)53
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
11Shots9
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
4Shots on target5
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
1.61xG1.49
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
3Corners5
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
87Dangerous attacks79
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
12Fouls5
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
0Cards0
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
1.07Goals scored / match0.72
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
1.17Goals conceded / match1.31
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
39%Average possession35%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
2.17Shots on target / match1.13
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.27Shots per match3.63
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
2.17Shots on target1.13
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
20.3%Shot conversion19.8%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
39%Possession35%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
1.28xG for0.95
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
1.31xG against1.29
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

Shooting quality

Pamba Jiji: Counter-attackingTanzania Prisons: Counter-attacking
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
Accuracy (shots on target)41%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.26
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.490.64

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Tanzania Prisons is 133% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 1.4 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons

Pamba Jiji
LWLLL
Season result split
30% W30% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-12
1.20 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-5-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.89Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Tanzania Prisons
LWWLD
Season result split
28% W19% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-17
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-11
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pamba Jiji is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

1.07 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 0.72 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons

Pamba Jiji is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Pamba Jiji · 1.31 goals / match - Tanzania Prisons

Pamba Jiji scoring profile: strong

Pamba Jiji scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).

Tanzania Prisons scoring profile: mixed

Tanzania Prisons scores in 47% of matches (15 of 32 matches), while Pamba Jiji keeps a clean sheet in 37% (11 of 30 matches).

32Goals scored (season)23
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
35Goals conceded (season)42
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
2.23Average goals in match2.03
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
7Goals scored (last 5)4
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
8Goals conceded (last 5)6
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

How often they score at least...

63%1 goal47%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
27%2 goals16%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
13%3 goals9%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
3%4 goals0%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

How often they concede at least...

63%1 goal69%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
37%2 goals41%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
17%3 goals16%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
0%4 goals6%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

31%
Tanzania Prisons - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 32 matches
35%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time19%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
13%Scored in both halves6%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
23%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
60%BTTS - last 540%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Pamba Jiji is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - Pamba Jiji · 1.03 pts / match - Tanzania Prisons

Pamba Jiji - half-time state
17% leading60% draw23% trailing
Tanzania Prisons - half-time state
16% leading56% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.03
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.34
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
0.47Goals conceded (1st half)0.63
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
0.9Average goals (1st half)0.97
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
57%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
67%No goal before half-time69%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.97
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
0.47Goals scored (2nd half)0.38
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
1.13Average goals (2nd half)0.97
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
53%Clean sheet after half-time56%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons
67%No goal after half-time78%
Pamba JijiTanzania Prisons

Pamba Jiji - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
33
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding176%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tanzania Prisons - second-half results

16% W50% R34% P
33
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding175%

Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pamba Jiji - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Tanzania Prisons - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.80
Goals scored / match0.00.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.41.2
1 goal20%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Pamba Jiji
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
6
3
16-30
5
8
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
6
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Tanzania Prisons
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
1
5
16-30
4
10
31-45
2
5
46-60
5
7
61-75
5
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
36%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
30%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
20%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Pamba Jiji

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
134%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Tanzania Prisons

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
83%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).

Teams vs league

Pamba JijiLigaTanzania Prisons
Average goals in match 2.232.17 2.03
Both teams scored 40%35% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%39% 38%
Clean sheets 37%39% 31%
Goal before half-time 57%60% 56%
Goal after half-time 67%63% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
35%
Both teams scored
39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.30
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+20%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Pamba Jiji 0 - 1 - 0 Tanzania Prisons. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons?

The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Pamba Jiji 2:3 Tanzania Prisons. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons?

Pamba Jiji score 1.07 goals per game on average and Tanzania Prisons 0.72. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Pamba Jiji's matches and 31% of Tanzania Prisons's.

What form are Pamba Jiji and Tanzania Prisons in?

Over the last 5 games Pamba Jiji have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Tanzania Prisons 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Pamba Jiji vs Tanzania Prisons: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.