Greece - Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Panaitolikos vs Larissa: match statistics

Panaitolikos crest
Panaitolikos
1 : 1half-time 0:0
Larissa crest
Larissa

Panaitolikos vs Larissa: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Panaitolikos play Larissa in Super League (Greece). The match date is 12 May 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Panaitolikos: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Larissa: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Panaitolikos scores 0.97 and concedes 1.42 goals per match. Larissa scores 0.94 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Panaitolikos 47%, Larissa 61%. Over 2.5: Panaitolikos 44%, Larissa 39%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Larissa has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.08. Panaitolikos: 9.4 shots per match, Larissa: 11.4.

Match halves

Panaitolikos: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.53. Larissa: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.58.

Goals by minute

Panaitolikos: 61-75 (9 goals). Larissa: 46-60 (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 3-0-0. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 67%.

Match description

I predict a home win (Panaitolikos). Panaitolikos average 1.13 goals per home match with a 12% shot conversion rate, 49% possession and win 25% of home games; Larissa on the road average 0.88 goals per match, 8% conversion and only 13% away wins. Defensively both teams are vulnerable: Panaitolikos concede 1.75 goals at home, Larissa 1.56 away, while the visitors have more clean sheets (19% vs 13%) and draw more often (38% away draws vs 13% for the home side). In terms of quality of chances Larissa have higher xG (1.17 vs 1.07) and more shots on target (3.75 vs 2.69), but the visitors’ lower conversion means they exploit those chances less. In the last five matches Panaitolikos have averaged 0.8 points per game (1W, 1D, 3L), and Larissa 0.6 points (0W, 3D, 2L), so I give the hosts a slight form edge. Considering the higher finishing efficiency (12% vs 8%), greater possession and better points return over the last five, I expect a narrow Panaitolikos victory, although a draw remains a realistic scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

69Possession (%)31
PanaitolikosLarissa
17Shots7
PanaitolikosLarissa
6Shots on target3
PanaitolikosLarissa
2.02xG0.84
PanaitolikosLarissa
11Corners1
PanaitolikosLarissa
73Dangerous attacks25
PanaitolikosLarissa
13Fouls11
PanaitolikosLarissa
2Cards1
PanaitolikosLarissa

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.97Goals scored / match0.94
PanaitolikosLarissa
1.42Goals conceded / match1.56
PanaitolikosLarissa
46%Average possession46%
PanaitolikosLarissa
3.08Shots on target / match3.81
PanaitolikosLarissa

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.36Shots per match11.36
PanaitolikosLarissa
3.08Shots on target3.81
PanaitolikosLarissa
10.4%Shot conversion8.3%
PanaitolikosLarissa
46%Possession46%
PanaitolikosLarissa
1.08xG for1.25
PanaitolikosLarissa
1.57xG against1.52
PanaitolikosLarissa

Shooting quality

Panaitolikos: BalancedLarissa: Balanced
PanaitolikosLarissa
Accuracy (shots on target)33%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Larissa is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Panaitolikos · 1.2 pts / match - Larissa

Panaitolikos
LWDDL
Season result split
25% W25% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-18
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-11
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Larissa
DDDWL
Season result split
14% W42% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-15-16
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-7-9
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Panaitolikos is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.42 goals / match - Panaitolikos · 1.56 goals / match - Larissa

Panaitolikos scoring profile: strong

Panaitolikos scores in 56% of matches (20 of 36 matches), while Larissa keeps a clean sheet in 17% (6 of 36 matches).

Larissa scoring profile: very strong

Larissa scores in 72% of matches (26 of 36 matches), while Panaitolikos keeps a clean sheet in 19% (7 of 36 matches).

35Goals scored (season)34
PanaitolikosLarissa
51Goals conceded (season)56
PanaitolikosLarissa
2.39Average goals in match2.5
PanaitolikosLarissa
5Goals scored (last 5)7
PanaitolikosLarissa
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
PanaitolikosLarissa

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal72%
PanaitolikosLarissa
25%2 goals22%
PanaitolikosLarissa
11%3 goals0%
PanaitolikosLarissa
6%4 goals0%
PanaitolikosLarissa

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal83%
PanaitolikosLarissa
33%2 goals42%
PanaitolikosLarissa
14%3 goals22%
PanaitolikosLarissa
6%4 goals6%
PanaitolikosLarissa

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time17%
PanaitolikosLarissa
3%BTTS in both halves8%
PanaitolikosLarissa
14%Scored in both halves8%
PanaitolikosLarissa

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
PanaitolikosLarissa
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS8%
PanaitolikosLarissa
80%BTTS - last 5100%
PanaitolikosLarissa

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
PanaitolikosLarissa
31%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
PanaitolikosLarissa
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
PanaitolikosLarissa

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
PanaitolikosLarissa
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
PanaitolikosLarissa
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
PanaitolikosLarissa

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Panaitolikos is 57% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - Panaitolikos · 0.69 pts / match - Larissa

Panaitolikos - half-time state
22% leading42% draw36% trailing
Larissa - half-time state
11% leading36% draw53% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)0.69
PanaitolikosLarissa
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.36
PanaitolikosLarissa
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.86
PanaitolikosLarissa
1.19Average goals (1st half)1.22
PanaitolikosLarissa
50%Clean sheet before half-time42%
PanaitolikosLarissa
64%No goal before half-time72%
PanaitolikosLarissa

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.11
PanaitolikosLarissa
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.58
PanaitolikosLarissa
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.69
PanaitolikosLarissa
1.19Average goals (2nd half)1.28
PanaitolikosLarissa
47%Clean sheet after half-time44%
PanaitolikosLarissa
67%No goal after half-time47%
PanaitolikosLarissa

Panaitolikos - second-half results

22% W39% R39% P
39
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
38
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding114%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Larissa - second-half results

19% W53% R28% P
25
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-18
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.69
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Panaitolikos - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.61.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Larissa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Panaitolikos
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
6
8
16-30
5
14
31-45
3
6
46-60
9
8
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Larissa
ScoredConceded
4
11
0-15
1
11
16-30
8
9
31-45
11
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
40%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
12%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 8 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Panaitolikos

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Larissa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

PanaitolikosLigaLarissa
Average goals in match 2.392.57 2.50
Both teams scored 47%49% 61%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%50% 39%
Clean sheets 19%30% 17%
Goal before half-time 67%71% 69%
Goal after half-time 72%75% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Panaitolikos 3 - 0 - 0 Larissa. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Panaitolikos vs Larissa?

The Super League match finished Panaitolikos 1:1 Larissa. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Panaitolikos and Larissa?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Panaitolikos won 3, Larissa won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Panaitolikos vs Larissa?

Panaitolikos score 0.97 goals per game on average and Larissa 0.94. The Super League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Panaitolikos's matches and 61% of Larissa's.

What form are Panaitolikos and Larissa in?

Over the last 5 games Panaitolikos have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Larissa 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panaitolikos vs Larissa?

The statistical background for Panaitolikos vs Larissa — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.