Panargiakos vs Kalamata: match statistics
Kalamata demonstrates absolute dominance this season with a record of 14 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses, scoring 40 goals while conceding only 9. The away team is in excellent form, winning all of their last 5 matches and maintaining an impressive away efficiency (86% wins, 0% losses). Panargiakos is the absolute contrast – no wins this season, 11 losses, 75% losses at home, and tragic form (4 losses in their last 5 matches). The hosts have scored only 8 goals all season, conceding as many as 35, resulting in a -13 goal difference in home matches. xG statistics (1.05 for Panargiakos vs 1.22 for Kalamata), shot accuracy (9% vs 43%), and ball possession (49% vs 53%) further confirm the visitors' massive advantage. All indicators unequivocally point to a certain victory for Kalamata.
Panargiakos vs Kalamata: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Panargiakos played against Kalamata in Super League 2 (Greece). The game was played on January 18, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Panargiakos has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Kalamata has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Panargiakos scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 2.19. Kalamata scores 2.50 and allows 0.56. Games in this league average 2.31 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Panargiakos's games and 50% of Kalamata's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 50%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 38% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Kalamata has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.05 per game. Panargiakos takes 2.1 shots per game, while Kalamata takes 2.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Panargiakos leads at halftime in 6% of its games and scores 0.06 goals per game after halftime. Kalamata leads at halftime in 75% and scores 1.19 after halftime.
When the teams score
Panargiakos's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (3 goals). For Kalamata, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League 2 games average 2.31 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 38% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kalamata demonstrates absolute dominance this season with a record of 14 wins, 2 draws, and 0 losses, scoring 40 goals while conceding only 9. The away team is in excellent form, winning all of their last 5 matches and maintaining an impressive away efficiency (86% wins, 0% losses). Panargiakos is the absolute contrast – no wins this season, 11 losses, 75% losses at home, and tragic form (4 losses in their last 5 matches). The hosts have scored only 8 goals all season, conceding as many as 35, resulting in a -13 goal difference in home matches. xG statistics (1.05 for Panargiakos vs 1.22 for Kalamata), shot accuracy (9% vs 43%), and ball possession (49% vs 53%) further confirm the visitors' massive advantage. All indicators unequivocally point to a certain victory for Kalamata.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Panargiakos | Kalamata | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 21% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.51 | 0.66 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 1.14 | 2.50 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kalamata is 1400% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - Panargiakos · 3 pts / game - Kalamata
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kalamata is 400% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - Panargiakos · 2.5 goals / game - Kalamata
Kalamata is 291% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.19 goals / game - Panargiakos · 0.56 goals / game - Kalamata
Panargiakos scores in 50% of games (8 of 16 meczów), while Kalamata keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 meczów).
Kalamata scores in 100% of games (16 of 16 meczów), while Panargiakos keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Panargiakos
Over / Under - Kalamata
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kalamata is 262% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.69 pts / game - Panargiakos · 2.5 pts / game - Kalamata
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Panargiakos - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Kalamata - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 75% of games and wins 88%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.60 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Panargiakos
Kalamata
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).
Teams vs league
| Panargiakos | Liga | Kalamata | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.69 | 2.31 | ▲ 3.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 39% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 34% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 75% | 67% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 72% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- KalamataGoalVassilis Mantzis
- KalamataGoalNicolás Czornomaz
Head-to-head
Record from Panargiakos's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Kalamata. Games average 6.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Panargiakos vs Kalamata?
The Super League 2 match finished Panargiakos 0:2 Kalamata. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Panargiakos vs Kalamata?
Panargiakos score 0.50 goals per game on average and Kalamata 2.50. The Super League 2 average is 2.31 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Panargiakos's matches and 50% of Kalamata's.
What form are Panargiakos and Kalamata in?
Over the last 5 games Panargiakos have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Kalamata 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panargiakos vs Kalamata?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.