Panevėžys vs Hegelmann Litauen: match statistics
Both teams find themselves in a similar league situation, occupying 9th and 8th positions with an identical record of 0 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss this season. Panevėžys has recorded 100% draws in home matches and has yet to concede a goal at their own stadium, indicating a solid defensive setup. Hegelmann Litauen displays slightly better form over the last 5 matches (1.4 points per match vs 0.8), but the absence of any away statistics hinders a full assessment of their potential on foreign soil. Given the hosts' defensive stability in home games and the balanced overall form of both squads, a draw appears to be the most probable result. The probability edge for the hosts stems from the home pitch advantage and their unbeaten home record thus far.
Panevėžys vs Hegelmann Litauen: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Panevėžys played against Hegelmann Litauen in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Panevėžys has 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.50 points per game. Hegelmann Litauen has 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 0.50 points per game.
Scoring records
Panevėžys scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 2.00. Hegelmann Litauen scores 0.50 and allows 1.50. Games in this league average 2.55 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Panevėžys's games and 50% of Hegelmann Litauen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 0%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Panevėžys has the higher season xG average, 1.13 to 1.10 per game. Panevėžys takes 9.5 shots per game, while Hegelmann Litauen takes 9.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Panevėžys leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Hegelmann Litauen leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Panevėžys's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For Hegelmann Litauen, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.55 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Both teams find themselves in a similar league situation, occupying 9th and 8th positions with an identical record of 0 wins, 1 draw, and 1 loss this season. Panevėžys has recorded 100% draws in home matches and has yet to concede a goal at their own stadium, indicating a solid defensive setup. Hegelmann Litauen displays slightly better form over the last 5 matches (1.4 points per match vs 0.8), but the absence of any away statistics hinders a full assessment of their potential on foreign soil. Given the hosts' defensive stability in home games and the balanced overall form of both squads, a draw appears to be the most probable result. The probability edge for the hosts stems from the home pitch advantage and their unbeaten home record thus far.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Panevėžys | Hegelmann Litauen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 22% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.13 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hegelmann Litauen is 33% better for: goals allowed per game.
2 goals / game - Panevėžys · 1.5 goals / game - Hegelmann Litauen
Panevėžys scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while Hegelmann Litauen keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 meczów).
Hegelmann Litauen scores in 50% of games (1 of 2 meczów), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Panevėžys
Over / Under - Hegelmann Litauen
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hegelmann Litauen is 100% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Panevėžys · 2 pts / game - Hegelmann Litauen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Panevėžys - second-half results
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Hegelmann Litauen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 1.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 50% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 50% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 50% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 46-60 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Panevėžys
Hegelmann Litauen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Panevėžys | Liga | Hegelmann Litauen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.50 | 2.55 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 32% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 73% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 73% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Panevėžys's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 3 losses against Hegelmann Litauen. Games average 2.75 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Panevėžys vs Hegelmann Litauen?
The A Lyga match finished Panevėžys 1:1 Hegelmann Litauen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Panevėžys and Hegelmann Litauen?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Panevėžys won 1, Hegelmann Litauen won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Panevėžys vs Hegelmann Litauen?
Panevėžys score 0.50 goals per game on average and Hegelmann Litauen 0.50. The A Lyga average is 2.55 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Panevėžys's matches and 50% of Hegelmann Litauen's.
What form are Panevėžys and Hegelmann Litauen in?
Over the last 5 games Panevėžys have a 0-1-1 record (0.50 points per game) and Hegelmann Litauen 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Panevėžys vs Hegelmann Litauen?
The statistical background for Panevėžys vs Hegelmann Litauen — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.