Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Patro Eisden play AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 18 December 2025 at 20:00. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Patro Eisden: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. AS Eupen: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Patro Eisden scores 1.38 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. AS Eupen scores 1.38 and concedes 1.13. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Patro Eisden 53%, AS Eupen 53%. Over 2.5: Patro Eisden 47%, AS Eupen 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.21. Patro Eisden: 14.8 shots per match, AS Eupen: 10.5.

Match halves

Patro Eisden: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.82. AS Eupen: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.66.

Goals by minute

Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (12 goals). AS Eupen: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

32Possession (%)68
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
11Shots8
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
3Shots on target4
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.29xG1
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
4Corners6
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
54Dangerous attacks28
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
23Fouls17
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
6Cards4
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.38Goals scored / match1.38
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.29Goals conceded / match1.13
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
37%Average possession52%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
5.24Shots on target / match3.81
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.82Shots per match10.5
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
5.24Shots on target3.81
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
9.3%Shot conversion13.1%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
37%Possession52%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.65xG for1.21
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.16xG against1.61
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Shooting quality

Patro Eisden: AttackingAS Eupen: Efficient finishing
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
Accuracy (shots on target)35%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AS Eupen is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Patro Eisden · 1.6 pts / match - AS Eupen

Patro Eisden
LLWDL
Season result split
41% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-10
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-5-4
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
AS Eupen
WDWDL
Season result split
38% W34% R28% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-11-9
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-6
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AS Eupen is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Patro Eisden · 1.13 goals / match - AS Eupen

Patro Eisden scoring profile: strong

Patro Eisden scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (12 of 32 matches).

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

47Goals scored (season)44
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
44Goals conceded (season)36
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
2.68Average goals in match2.5
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal84%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
41%2 goals38%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
15%3 goals13%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
12%4 goals3%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal63%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
38%2 goals38%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
12%3 goals13%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
9%4 goals0%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time16%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
21%Scored in both halves16%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
40%BTTS - last 540%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

68%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time34%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time13%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Patro Eisden - half-time state
35% leading38% draw26% trailing
AS Eupen - half-time state
38% leading38% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per match (1st half)1.5
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0.56Goals scored (1st half)0.72
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1Average goals (1st half)1.25
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
59%Clean sheet before half-time59%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
59%No goal before half-time50%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.44
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0.82Goals scored (2nd half)0.66
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
0.85Goals conceded (2nd half)0.59
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
1.68Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
41%Clean sheet after half-time59%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen
50%No goal after half-time50%
Patro EisdenAS Eupen

Patro Eisden - second-half results

29% W35% R35% P
49
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AS Eupen - second-half results

34% W41% R25% P
48
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
46
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
5
4
16-30
7
5
31-45
8
9
46-60
8
7
61-75
12
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
9
9
16-30
11
6
31-45
8
2
46-60
6
8
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.59
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.40
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
77%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Patro EisdenLigaAS Eupen
Average goals in match 2.682.84 2.50
Both teams scored 53%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 47%54% 47%
Clean sheets 29%26% 38%
Goal before half-time 68%71% 75%
Goal after half-time 82%79% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Patro Eisden 0 - 1 - 0 AS Eupen. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

KAS Eupen
0 : 0
Patro Eisden Maasmechelen

FAQ

What was the result of Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?

The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 0:1 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?

Patro Eisden score 1.38 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.38. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 53% of Patro Eisden's matches and 53% of AS Eupen's.

What form are Patro Eisden and AS Eupen in?

Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and AS Eupen 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.