Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen: match statistics
Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Patro Eisden played against AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on December 18, 2025. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
Patro Eisden has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. AS Eupen has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Patro Eisden scores 1.25 goals per game and allows 0.94. AS Eupen scores 1.44 and allows 1.06. Games in this league average 2.70 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 44% of Patro Eisden's games and 56% of AS Eupen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 44% and 50%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Patro Eisden has the higher season xG average, 1.71 to 1.10 per game. Patro Eisden takes 16.1 shots per game, while AS Eupen takes 9.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Patro Eisden leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. AS Eupen leads at halftime in 31% and scores 0.69 after halftime.
When the teams score
Patro Eisden's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For AS Eupen, it is minutes 31-45+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.70 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Patro Eisden | AS Eupen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Patro Eisden is 43% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Patro Eisden · 1.4 pts / game - AS Eupen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AS Eupen is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
1.25 goals / game - Patro Eisden · 1.44 goals / game - AS Eupen
Patro Eisden is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.94 goals / game - Patro Eisden · 1.06 goals / game - AS Eupen
Patro Eisden scores in 63% of games (10 of 16 meczów), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).
AS Eupen scores in 88% of games (14 of 16 meczów), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 38% (6 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Patro Eisden
Over / Under - AS Eupen
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AS Eupen is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Patro Eisden · 1.38 pts / game - AS Eupen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Patro Eisden - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
AS Eupen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Patro Eisden
AS Eupen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Patro Eisden | Liga | AS Eupen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.19 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 53% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 50% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 27% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 56% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Patro Eisden's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against AS Eupen. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?
The First Division B match finished Patro Eisden 0:1 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?
Patro Eisden score 1.25 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.44. The First Division B average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Patro Eisden's matches and 56% of AS Eupen's.
What form are Patro Eisden and AS Eupen in?
Over the last 5 games Patro Eisden have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and AS Eupen 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Patro Eisden vs AS Eupen?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.