Paykan vs Kheybar Khorramabad: match statistics
Paykan vs Kheybar Khorramabad: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Paykan played against Kheybar Khorramabad in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on December 27, 2025. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Paykan has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Kheybar Khorramabad has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Paykan scores 0.79 goals per game and allows 1.07. Kheybar Khorramabad scores 0.93 and allows 0.86. Games in this league average 1.75 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 43% of Paykan's games and 50% of Kheybar Khorramabad's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 29%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 24% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Paykan has the higher season xG average, 1.17 to 1.12 per game. Paykan takes 6.1 shots per game, while Kheybar Khorramabad takes 1.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Paykan leads at halftime in 36% of its games and scores 0.14 goals per game after halftime. Kheybar Khorramabad leads at halftime in 14% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Paykan's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Kheybar Khorramabad, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.75 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 24% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Stats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Paykan | Kheybar Khorramabad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | -18% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.98 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.42 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Kheybar Khorramabad is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - Paykan · 1.8 pts / game - Kheybar Khorramabad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kheybar Khorramabad is 18% better for: goals scored per game.
0.79 goals / game - Paykan · 0.93 goals / game - Kheybar Khorramabad
Kheybar Khorramabad is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.07 goals / game - Paykan · 0.86 goals / game - Kheybar Khorramabad
Paykan scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 meczów), while Kheybar Khorramabad keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 meczów).
Kheybar Khorramabad scores in 64% of games (9 of 14 meczów), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Paykan
Over / Under - Kheybar Khorramabad
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paykan is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.57 pts / game - Paykan · 1.14 pts / game - Kheybar Khorramabad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Paykan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 36% of games and wins 21%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Kheybar Khorramabad - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 36%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Paykan
Kheybar Khorramabad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Paykan | Liga | Kheybar Khorramabad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 1.86 | 1.75 | • 1.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 43% | 37% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 29% | 24% | ▲ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 41% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 71% | 56% | • 57% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 64% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Paykan vs Kheybar Khorramabad?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Paykan 0:0 Kheybar Khorramabad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Paykan vs Kheybar Khorramabad?
Paykan score 0.79 goals per game on average and Kheybar Khorramabad 0.93. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 24% of games. Both teams score in 43% of Paykan's matches and 50% of Kheybar Khorramabad's.
What form are Paykan and Kheybar Khorramabad in?
Over the last 5 games Paykan have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Kheybar Khorramabad 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paykan vs Kheybar Khorramabad?
The statistical background for Paykan vs Kheybar Khorramabad — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.