Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan: match statistics

Paykan crest
Paykan
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Mes Rafsanjan crest
Mes Rafsanjan
155%(1.55)
X30%(3.34)
215%(6.08)

Paykan displays significantly better home form, securing 30% wins at home and keeping 50% clean sheets, indicating a solid defense at their own stadium. Mes Rafsanjan has catastrophic away statistics - 0% wins on the road, 80% losses, and a goal difference of -14, making them one of the weakest away teams in the league. The form of both teams in the last five matches also favors the hosts, who have earned 1.4 points per game compared to Mes Rafsanjan's 0.8. Additionally, the visitors have failed to score in 60% of their away matches, averaging just 0.5 goals per game on the road. Considering all these factors, Paykan holds a clear advantage, although their own inconsistency (40% draws at home) means that a draw also remains a realistic scenario.

Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Paykan play Mes Rafsanjan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The match date is 14 February 2026 at 12:30. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Paykan: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Mes Rafsanjan: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Paykan scores 0.65 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Mes Rafsanjan scores 0.59 and concedes 1.32. League average: 1.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Paykan 30%, Mes Rafsanjan 27%. Over 2.5: Paykan 17%, Mes Rafsanjan 27%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

xG, shots and style

Paykan has higher xG: 1.14 vs 0.87. Paykan: 3.6 shots per match, Mes Rafsanjan: -0.3.

Match halves

Paykan: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.22. Mes Rafsanjan: half-time lead 9%, second-half goals 0.32.

Goals by minute

Paykan: 16-30 (4 goals). Mes Rafsanjan: 76-90+ (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Persian Gulf Pro League: 1.79 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 28%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Paykan displays significantly better home form, securing 30% wins at home and keeping 50% clean sheets, indicating a solid defense at their own stadium. Mes Rafsanjan has catastrophic away statistics - 0% wins on the road, 80% losses, and a goal difference of -14, making them one of the weakest away teams in the league. The form of both teams in the last five matches also favors the hosts, who have earned 1.4 points per game compared to Mes Rafsanjan's 0.8. Additionally, the visitors have failed to score in 60% of their away matches, averaging just 0.5 goals per game on the road. Considering all these factors, Paykan holds a clear advantage, although their own inconsistency (40% draws at home) means that a draw also remains a realistic scenario.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
-1Shots-1
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
-1Shots on target-1
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0xG0
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
-1Corners-1
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0Dangerous attacks0
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
-1Fouls-1
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
3Cards2
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.65Goals scored / match0.59
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.91Goals conceded / match1.32
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
24%Average possession1%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.78Shots on target / match-0.86
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.65Shots per match-0.27
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.78Shots on target-0.86
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
17.9%Shot conversion-216.7%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
24%Possession1%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
1.14xG for0.87
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.96xG against1.31
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

Shooting quality

Paykan: Counter-attackingMes Rafsanjan: Balanced
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
Accuracy (shots on target)21%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.310.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.830.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Paykan is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Paykan · 0.8 pts / match - Mes Rafsanjan

Paykan
WLLDD
Season result split
22% W39% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-9
1.04 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-5-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Mes Rafsanjan
DLLWL
Season result split
14% W27% R59% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-6-13
0.68 pts / match · goal difference -16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-2-8
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paykan is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

0.65 goals / match - Paykan · 0.59 goals / match - Mes Rafsanjan

Paykan is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.91 goals / match - Paykan · 1.32 goals / match - Mes Rafsanjan

Paykan scoring profile: mixed

Paykan scores in 52% of matches (12 of 23 matches), while Mes Rafsanjan keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

Mes Rafsanjan scoring profile: more difficult

Mes Rafsanjan scores in 36% of matches (8 of 22 matches), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 39% (9 of 23 matches).

15Goals scored (season)13
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
21Goals conceded (season)29
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
1.57Average goals in match1.91
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
2Goals scored (last 5)2
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

How often they score at least...

52%1 goal36%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
13%2 goals23%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0%3 goals0%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0%4 goals0%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

How often they concede at least...

61%1 goal68%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
30%2 goals41%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0%3 goals18%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0%4 goals5%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time14%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
4%BTTS in both halves5%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
4%Scored in both halves9%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
20%BTTS - last 50%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time14%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time5%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

2nd half

57%Min. 1 goal after half-time59%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time14%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paykan is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.35 pts / match - Paykan · 0.77 pts / match - Mes Rafsanjan

Paykan - half-time state
26% leading57% draw17% trailing
Mes Rafsanjan - half-time state
9% leading50% draw41% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.35Points per match (1st half)0.77
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.27
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.59
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.78Average goals (1st half)0.86
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
65%Clean sheet before half-time45%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
61%No goal before half-time77%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

After half-time (2nd half)

0.74Points per match (2nd half)0.82
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.22Goals scored (2nd half)0.32
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.57Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
0.78Average goals (2nd half)1.05
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
52%Clean sheet after half-time50%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan
83%No goal after half-time77%
PaykanMes Rafsanjan

Paykan - second-half results

9% W48% R43% P
31
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 22%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Mes Rafsanjan - second-half results

14% W41% R45% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.77
PPG before half-time
Lead holding156%

Leads at half-time in 9% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Paykan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match0.60.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Mes Rafsanjan - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match0.60.6
1 goal60%40%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Paykan
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
4
1
16-30
4
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
1
4
61-75
3
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Mes Rafsanjan
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
2
4
16-30
1
7
31-45
3
8
46-60
0
2
61-75
4
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.74
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
29%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
19%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
31%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Paykan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
64%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
115%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Mes Rafsanjan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

PaykanLigaMes Rafsanjan
Average goals in match 1.571.79 1.91
Both teams scored 30%38% 27%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 17%28% 27%
Clean sheets 39%41% 32%
Goal before half-time 57%54% 64%
Goal after half-time 57%62% 59%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.79
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
28%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
41%
Clean sheets
1.01
Home goals / match
0.79
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
54%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
4%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Paykan 0 - 0 - 1 Mes Rafsanjan. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Mes Rafsanjan
2 : 0
Paykan

FAQ

What was the result of Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Paykan 0:2 Mes Rafsanjan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan?

Paykan score 0.65 goals per game on average and Mes Rafsanjan 0.59. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Paykan's matches and 27% of Mes Rafsanjan's.

What form are Paykan and Mes Rafsanjan in?

Over the last 5 games Paykan have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Mes Rafsanjan 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.