Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan: match statistics
Paykan displays significantly better home form, securing 30% wins at home and keeping 50% clean sheets, indicating a solid defense at their own stadium. Mes Rafsanjan has catastrophic away statistics - 0% wins on the road, 80% losses, and a goal difference of -14, making them one of the weakest away teams in the league. The form of both teams in the last five matches also favors the hosts, who have earned 1.4 points per game compared to Mes Rafsanjan's 0.8. Additionally, the visitors have failed to score in 60% of their away matches, averaging just 0.5 goals per game on the road. Considering all these factors, Paykan holds a clear advantage, although their own inconsistency (40% draws at home) means that a draw also remains a realistic scenario.
Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Paykan played against Mes Rafsanjan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on February 14, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Paykan has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Mes Rafsanjan has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Paykan scores 0.70 goals per game and allows 0.90. Mes Rafsanjan scores 0.55 and allows 1.40. Games in this league average 1.74 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of Paykan's games and 30% of Mes Rafsanjan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 30%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 27% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Paykan has the higher season xG average, 1.14 to 0.87 per game. Paykan takes 4.3 shots per game, while Mes Rafsanjan takes -0.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Paykan leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Mes Rafsanjan leads at halftime in 5% and scores 0.30 after halftime.
When the teams score
Paykan's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). For Mes Rafsanjan, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.74 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 27% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Paykan displays significantly better home form, securing 30% wins at home and keeping 50% clean sheets, indicating a solid defense at their own stadium. Mes Rafsanjan has catastrophic away statistics - 0% wins on the road, 80% losses, and a goal difference of -14, making them one of the weakest away teams in the league. The form of both teams in the last five matches also favors the hosts, who have earned 1.4 points per game compared to Mes Rafsanjan's 0.8. Additionally, the visitors have failed to score in 60% of their away matches, averaging just 0.5 goals per game on the road. Considering all these factors, Paykan holds a clear advantage, although their own inconsistency (40% draws at home) means that a draw also remains a realistic scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Paykan | Mes Rafsanjan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 24% | 0% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.26 | 0.00 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.67 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Paykan is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Paykan · 0.8 pts / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Paykan is 27% better for: goals scored per game.
0.7 goals / game - Paykan · 0.55 goals / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Paykan is 56% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.9 goals / game - Paykan · 1.4 goals / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Paykan scores in 55% of games (11 of 20 meczów), while Mes Rafsanjan keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 meczów).
Mes Rafsanjan scores in 35% of games (7 of 20 meczów), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Paykan
Over / Under - Mes Rafsanjan
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Paykan is 93% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.35 pts / game - Paykan · 0.7 pts / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Paykan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Mes Rafsanjan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 5% of games and wins 10%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Paykan
Mes Rafsanjan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Paykan | Liga | Mes Rafsanjan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.60 | 1.74 | ▲ 1.95 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 30% | 37% | ▼ 30% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 27% | ▲ 30% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 40% | 42% | ▼ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 55% | 52% | ▲ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 55% | 60% | • 60% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Paykan's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Mes Rafsanjan. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Paykan 0:2 Mes Rafsanjan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan?
Paykan score 0.70 goals per game on average and Mes Rafsanjan 0.55. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 27% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Paykan's matches and 30% of Mes Rafsanjan's.
What form are Paykan and Mes Rafsanjan in?
Over the last 5 games Paykan have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Mes Rafsanjan 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Paykan vs Mes Rafsanjan: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.