Iran - Persian Gulf Pro LeagueShahid Dastgerdi StadiumData current as of October 18, 2026

Paykan vs Sanat Naft: match statistics

Paykan crest
Paykan
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Sanat Naft crest
Sanat Naft

Paykan vs Sanat Naft: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Paykan played against Sanat Naft in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: Shahid Dastgerdi Stadium. Final score: 2:0.

Recent form

Paykan has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Sanat Naft has 0 wins, 4 draws and 1 loss, with 0.80 points per game.

Scoring records

Paykan scores 0.60 goals per game and allows 1.00. Sanat Naft scores 0.20 and allows 0.80. Games in this league average 1.74 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 20% of Paykan's games and 20% of Sanat Naft's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 20%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 20% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

The teams have nearly identical season xG averages at 0.00 per game. Paykan takes -1.0 shots per game, while Sanat Naft takes -1.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Paykan leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.40 goals per game after halftime. Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Paykan's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). For Sanat Naft, it is minutes 0-15 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.74 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 20% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams have shown almost identical form in their last five matches: Paykan and Sanat Naft have each recorded 1 win, 3 draws and 1 defeat, averaging 1.2 points per game. The hosts sit higher in the table, in 9th place compared with their opponents’ 14th position, and have scored 3 goals this season, while Sanat Naft have managed just 1. At the same time, both sides have conceded 4 goals, indicating a similar level of defensive organization. The home and away records are exceptionally draw-heavy: each team has ended both of its available matches in that role in a goalless draw, scoring and conceding no goals. A low-scoring draw therefore appears the most likely outcome, although Paykan’s marginally greater attacking potential gives the hosts a slightly higher chance of winning than the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as Sanat Naft averages no goals scored away from home and failed to score in 100% of such matches. In their last five games, both teams have recorded BTTS in only 20% of cases, while each averages just 0.6 goals scored and 0.8 goals conceded. Paykan also have limited attacking output, averaging 0.5 goals at home, making a one-sided scoreline or a goalless draw the most likely outcomes. Additionally, the league BTTS average is only 31%, while the average total goals is 1.82, supporting a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have averaged just 0.6 goals scored and 0.8 conceded over their last 5 matches, resulting in only 1.4 total goals per game. Each team’s matches have gone Over 2.5 goals in just 20% of their last five appearances, with an equally low 20% of games featuring both teams scoring. Sanat Naft have failed to score in their away data and have kept clean sheets in 100% of those matches, further limiting the prospects of an open game. The league as a whole is clearly low-scoring, averaging 1.82 goals, with only 23% of matches finishing Over 2.5. Therefore, Under 3.5 goals has very strong statistical support.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw both at half-time and at full-time, as both teams drew 60% of their last five matches and averaged 1.2 points per game over that sample. Paykan were level at the break in 80% of those matches, while Sanat Naft were level at half-time in 60%; at the same time, the hosts scored just 0.2 goals per game before the break, compared with 0.4 for the visitors. The teams’ recent matches produced an average of only 1.4 goals, with each side averaging 0.6 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, limiting the likelihood of a decisive outcome. After the break, both teams drew in 80% of their last five appearances, while Sanat Naft kept a clean sheet in 100% of those matches. In addition, the league is highly defensive, averaging 1.82 goals per match, and both teams scored in only 31% of games, so a draw following a cautious first half has the strongest basis.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

-1Possession (%)-1
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Shots-1
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Shots on target-1
PaykanSanat Naft
0xG0
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Corners-1
PaykanSanat Naft
0Dangerous attacks0
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Fouls-1
PaykanSanat Naft
2Cards0
PaykanSanat Naft

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.6Goals scored / game0.2
PaykanSanat Naft
1Goals allowed / game0.8
PaykanSanat Naft
-1%Average possession-1%
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Shots on target / game-1
PaykanSanat Naft

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

-1Shots per game-1
PaykanSanat Naft
-1Shots on target-1
PaykanSanat Naft
-60%Shot conversion-20%
PaykanSanat Naft
-1%Possession-1%
PaykanSanat Naft
0xG for0
PaykanSanat Naft
0xG against0
PaykanSanat Naft

Shooting quality

Paykan: BalancedSanat Naft: Balanced
PaykanSanat Naft
Accuracy (shots on target)0%0%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.00
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Paykan is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Paykan · 0.8 pts / game - Sanat Naft

Paykan
LDWDL
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 at home
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Sanat Naft
DDLDD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W80% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-4-1
0.80 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-0
Last 5 away
0-2-0
DD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Paykan is 200% better for: goals scored per game.

0.6 goals / game - Paykan · 0.2 goals / game - Sanat Naft

Sanat Naft is 25% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Paykan · 0.8 goals / game - Sanat Naft

Paykan scoring profile: more difficult

Paykan scores in 20% of games (1 of 5 games), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 games).

Sanat Naft scoring profile: more difficult

Sanat Naft scores in 20% of games (1 of 5 games), while Paykan keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 games).

3Goals scored (season)1
PaykanSanat Naft
5Goals conceded (season)4
PaykanSanat Naft
1.6Average goals per game1
PaykanSanat Naft
3Goals scored (last 5)1
PaykanSanat Naft
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
PaykanSanat Naft

How often they score at least...

20%1 goal20%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%2 goals0%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%3 goals0%
PaykanSanat Naft
0%4 goals0%
PaykanSanat Naft

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal40%
PaykanSanat Naft
40%2 goals20%
PaykanSanat Naft
0%3 goals20%
PaykanSanat Naft
0%4 goals0%
PaykanSanat Naft

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%BTTS in both halves0%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%Scored in both halves0%
PaykanSanat Naft

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
PaykanSanat Naft
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%BTTS - last 520%
PaykanSanat Naft

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

40%Min. 1 goal before half-time40%
PaykanSanat Naft
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
PaykanSanat Naft
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
PaykanSanat Naft

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time0%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
PaykanSanat Naft
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
PaykanSanat Naft

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Paykan - half-time state
0% leading80% draw20% trailing
Sanat Naft - half-time state
0% leading80% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per game (1st half)0.8
PaykanSanat Naft
0.2Goals scored (1st half)0.2
PaykanSanat Naft
0.6Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
PaykanSanat Naft
0.8Average goals (1st half)1
PaykanSanat Naft
60%Clean sheet before half-time60%
PaykanSanat Naft
80%No goal before half-time80%
PaykanSanat Naft

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per game (2nd half)1
PaykanSanat Naft
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)0
PaykanSanat Naft
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0
PaykanSanat Naft
0.8Average goals (2nd half)0
PaykanSanat Naft
60%Clean sheet after half-time100%
PaykanSanat Naft
80%No goal after half-time100%
PaykanSanat Naft

Paykan - second-half results

20% W60% D20% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Sanat Naft - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime-0.8

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Paykan - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.20
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game0.80.8
1 goal40%40%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Sanat Naft - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.801.00
Goals scored / game0.20.0
Goals allowed / game0.80.0
Average goals per game1.00.0
1 goal40%0%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Paykan
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
3
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
3
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.30
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.7 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
75%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
20%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
4%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
64%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 2 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Paykan

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-1.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
66%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.80
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
24%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 100% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).

Teams vs league

PaykanLigaSanat Naft
Average goals per game▼ 1.601.74▼ 1.00
Both teams scored▼ 20%30%▼ 20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)• 20%20%• 20%
Clean sheets▼ 40%46%▲ 60%
Goal before half-time▼ 40%52%▼ 40%
Goal after half-time▼ 40%61%▼ 0%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.74
Average goals per game
30%
Both teams scored
20%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.91
Home goals / game
0.83
Away goals / game
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defensive advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
52%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
2%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PaykanYellow cardSaeb Mohebi
  2. PaykanSubstitutionOn: Hasan ShoushtariOff: Mehdi Najafi
  3. Sanat NaftSubstitutionOn: Alireza RezaeiOff: Khashayar Zebarjad

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Paykan vs Sanat Naft?

The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Paykan 2:0 Sanat Naft. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Paykan vs Sanat Naft?

Paykan score 0.60 goals per game on average and Sanat Naft 0.20. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 20% of games. Both teams score in 20% of Paykan's matches and 20% of Sanat Naft's.

What form are Paykan and Sanat Naft in?

Over the last 5 games Paykan have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Sanat Naft 0-4-1 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Paykan vs Sanat Naft?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.